Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Machine Learning Supported the Modified Gustafson’s Criteria for Dental Age Estimation in Southwest China

  • Published:
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult age estimation is one of the most challenging problems in forensic science and physical anthropology. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) methods based on the modified Gustafson’s criteria for dental age estimation. In this retrospective study, a total of 851 orthopantomograms were collected from patients aged 15 to 40 years old. The secondary dentin formation (SE), periodontal recession (PE), and attrition (AT) of four mandibular premolars were analyzed according to the modified Gustafson’s criteria. Ten ML models were generated and compared for age estimation. The partial least squares regressor outperformed other models in males with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.151 years. The support vector regressor (MAE = 3.806 years) showed good performance in females. The accuracy of ML models is better than the single-tooth model provided in the previous studies (MAE = 4.747 years in males and MAE = 4.957 years in females). The Shapley additive explanations method was used to reveal the importance of the 12 features in ML models and found that AT and PE are the most influential in age estimation. The findings suggest that the modified Gustafson method can be effectively employed for adult age estimation in the southwest Chinese population. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of machine learning models to assist experts in achieving accurate and interpretable age estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data and material that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Marroquin TY, Karkhanis S, Kvaal SI, Vasudavan S, Kruger E, Tennant M: Age estimation in adults by dental imaging assessment systematic review. Forensic Sci Int 275:203-211, 2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Timme M, Timme WH, Olze A, Ottow C, Ribbecke S, Pfeiffer H, Dettmeyer R, Schmeling A: Dental age estimation in the living after completion of third molar mineralization: new data for Gustafson’s criteria. Int J Legal Med 131:569-577, 2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafson G: Åldersbestämningar på tänder. Odont Tidskr 55:556–558, 1947

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olze A, Hertel J, Schulz R, Wierer T, Schmeling A: Radiographic evaluation of Gustafson’s criteria for the purpose of forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 126:615-621, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Si XQ, Chu G, Olze A, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Chen T, Pfeiffer H, Guo YC, Schmeling A: Age assessment in the living using modified Gustafson’s criteria in a northern Chinese population. Int J Legal Med 133:921-930, 2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galibourg A, Cussat-Blanc S, Dumoncel J, Telmon N, Monsarrat P, Maret D: Comparison of different machine learning approaches to predict dental age using Demirjian’s staging approach. Int J Legal Med 135:665-675, 2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dezem TU, Franco A, Machado Palhares CE, Deitos AR, Alves da Silva RH, Santiago BM, Arrais Ribeiro IL, Junior ED: Testing the Olze and Timme Methods for Dental Age Estimation in Radiographs of Brazilian Subadults and Adults. Acta Stomatol Croat 55:390-396, 2021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Esan TA, Yengopal V, Schepartz LA: The Demirjian versus the Willems method for dental age estimation in different populations: A meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One 12:e0186682, 2017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mostad P, Schmeling A, Tamsen F: Mathematically optimal decisions in forensic age assessment. Int J Legal Med 136:765-776, 2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereira HM, Leite Duarte ME, Ribeiro Damasceno I, de Oliveira Moura Santos LA, Nogueira-Barbosa MH: Machine learning-based CT radiomics features for the prediction of pulmonary metastasis in osteosarcoma. The British Journal of Radiology 94:20201391, 2021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alam G, Ihsanullah I, Naushad M, Sillanpää M: Applications of artificial intelligence in water treatment for optimization and automation of adsorption processes: Recent advances and prospects. Chem Eng J 427:130011, 2022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saric R, Kevric J, Hadziabdic N, Osmanovic A, Kadic M, Saracevic M, Jokic D, Rajs V: Dental age assessment based on CBCT images using machine learning algorithms. Forensic Sci Int 334:111245, 2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, Horibe M, Eisses MJ, Adams T, Liston DE, Low DK, Newman SF, Kim J, Lee SI: Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng 2:749-760, 2018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Y, Lang J, Zuo JZ, Dong Y, Hu Z, Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Yang L, Wong STC, Wang H, Li H: The radiomic-clinical model using the SHAP method for assessing the treatment response of whole-brain radiotherapy: a multicentric study. Eur Radiol 32:8737-8747, 2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu C, Li L, Huang W, Wu T, Xu Q, Liu J, Hu B: Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study. Infect Dis Ther 11:1117-1132, 2022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao J, Wang J, Wang A, Xie Z, Wang Z, Wu S, Hassanien AE, Xiao K: Dental age estimation: a machine learning perspective. Proc. International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications: City

  17. Štepanovský M, Ibrová A, Buk Z, Velemínská J: Novel age estimation model based on development of permanent teeth compared with classical approach and other modern data mining methods. Forensic Sci Int 279:72-82, 2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vila-Blanco N, Carreira MJ, Varas-Quintana P, Balsa-Castro C, Tomas I: Deep Neural Networks for Chronological Age Estimation From OPG Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 39:2374-2384, 2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen S, Liu Z, Wang J, Fan L, Ji F, Tao J: Machine learning assisted Cameriere method for dental age estimation. BMC Oral Health 21:641, 2021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsikidis G: Altersbestimmung aus Zahnfilmen. Med Diss Heidelberg, 1981

  21. Lavez GP, Terada A, Dezem TU, Galo R, da Silva RHA: Age estimation using Olze’s method in an adult Brazilian population. J Forensic Leg Med 52:241-244, 2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koh KK, Tan JS, Nambiar P, Ibrahim N, Mutalik S, Khan Asif M: Age estimation from structural changes of teeth and buccal alveolar bone level. J Forensic Leg Med 48:15-21, 2017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scavuzzo CM, Scavuzzo JM, Campero MN, Anegagrie M, Aramendia AA, Benito A, Periago V: Feature importance: Opening a soil-transmitted helminth machine learning model via SHAP. Infect Dis Model 7:262-276, 2022

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liversidge HM, Smith BH, Maber M: Bias and accuracy of age estimation using developing teeth in 946 children. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:545-554, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meinl A, Huber CD, Tangl S, Gruber GM, Teschler-Nicola M, Watzek G: Comparison of the validity of three dental methods for the estimation of age at death. Forensic Sci Int 178:96-105, 2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fan F, Tu M, Li R, Dai X, Zhang K, Chen H, Huang F, Deng Z: Age estimation by multidetector computed tomography of cranial sutures in Chinese male adults. Am J Phys Anthropol 171:550-558, 2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aykroyd RG, Lucy D, Pollard AM, Solheim T: Technical note: regression analysis in adult age estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol 104:259-265, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mualla N, Houssein E-H, Hassan M-R: Dental Age Estimation Based on X-ray Images. CMC-Comput Mater Con 62:591-605, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S, Lee Y-H, Noh Y-K, Park FC, Auh QS: Age-group determination of living individuals using first molar images based on artificial intelligence. Sci Rep 11:1073, 2021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Milošević D, Vodanović M, Galić I, Subašić M: Automated estimation of chronological age from panoramic dental X-ray images using deep learning. Expert Syst Appl 189:116038, 2022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Amasya H, Yildirim D, Aydogan T, Kemaloglu N, Orhan K: Cervical vertebral maturation assessment on lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence: comparison of machine learning classifier models. Dentomaxillofac Rad 49:20190441, 2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81971801), the Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province of China (grant number 2022YFS0530), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant numbers 2021SCU12079, 2023SCU12037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xinhua Dai: conceptualization, methodology, writing — original draft preparation, data curation, writing — review and editing. Anjie Liu: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Junhong Liu: methodology, formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Mengjun Zhan: formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing, funding acquisition, resources, supervision. Yuanyuan Liu: formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Wenchi Ke: formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Lei Shi: formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Xinyu Huang: formal analysis and investigation, writing — review and editing. Hu Chen: methodology, formal analysis and investigation, software, validation, writing — review and editing. Zhenhua Deng: conceptualization, methodology, writing — review and editing, software, validation, funding acquisition, resources, supervision. Fei Fan: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, software, validation, data curation, writing — review and editing, funding acquisition, resources, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Fan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Sichuan University. And informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Human participants.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 520 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, X., Liu, A., Liu, J. et al. Machine Learning Supported the Modified Gustafson’s Criteria for Dental Age Estimation in Southwest China. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. 37, 611–619 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00956-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00956-0

Keywords

Navigation