Abstract
The objective is to determine patients’ utilization rate of radiology image viewing through an online patient portal and to understand its impact on radiologists. IRB approval was waived. In this two-part, multi-institutional study, patients’ image viewing rate was retrospectively assessed, and radiologists were anonymously surveyed for the impact of patient imaging access on their workflow. Patient access to web-based image viewing via electronic patient portals was enabled at 3 institutions (all had open radiology reports) within the past 5 years. The number of exams viewed online was compared against the total number of viewable imaging studies. An anonymized survey was distributed to radiologists at the 3 institutions, and responses were collected over 2 months. Patients viewed 14.2% of available exams – monthly open rate varied from 7.3 to 41.0%. A total of 254 radiologists responded to the survey (response rate 32.8%); 204 were aware that patients could view images. The majority (155/204; 76.0%) felt no impact on their role as radiologists; 11.8% felt negative and 9.3% positive. The majority (63.8%) were never approached by patients. Of the 86 who were contacted, 46.5% were contacted once or twice, 46.5% 3–4 times a year, and 4.7% 3–4 times a month. Free text comments included support for healthcare transparency (71), concern for patient confusion and anxiety (45), and need for attention to radiology reports and image annotations (15). A small proportion of patients viewed their radiology images. Overall, patients’ image viewing had minimal impact on radiologists. Radiologists were seldom contacted by patients. While many radiologists feel supportive, some are concerned about causing patient confusion and suggest minor workflow modifications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
De-identified data can be made available on request, subject to IRB data sharing approval.
References
Commissioner O of the. 21st Century Cures Act. FDA. FDA; 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/selected-amendments-fdc-act/21st-century-cures-act. Accessed February 7, 2021.
Johnson AJ, Easterling D, Nelson R, Chen MY, Frankel RM. Access to Radiologic Reports via a Patient Portal: Clinical Simulations to Investigate Patient Preferences. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(4):256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.12.023.
Okawa G, Ching K, Qian H, Feng Y. Automatic Release of Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(9):1219–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.037.
Henshaw D, Okawa G, Ching K, Garrido T, Qian H, Tsai J. Access to Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal: Experiences of Referring Physicians and Patients. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(6):582-586.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.01.015.
Halaska C, Sachs P, Sanfilippo K, Lin C-T. Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7). https://doi.org/10.2196/12595.
Vest JR, Jung H-Y, Ostrovsky A, Das LT, McGinty GB. Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol JACR. 2015;12(12 0 0):1371–1379.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.014.
Cristofaro M, Piselli P, Pianura E, et al. Patient Access to an Online Portal for Outpatient Radiological Images and Reports: Two Years’ Experience. J Digit Imaging. 2020;33(6):1479–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00359-5.
MyChart | Powered by Epic. . https://www.mychart.com/. Accessed June 6, 2021.
Greco G, Patel AS, Lewis SC, et al. Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(2):237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HHC and MDK contributed to the study design, data collection, and analysis and writing parts of the manuscript. ALK and CJR contributed to the data collection and analysis and writing parts of the manuscript. JVC contributed to the data analysis and writing parts of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
IRB approval was waived. Consent to participate and consent for publication were waived.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
The authors declare that they had full access to all of the data in this study and the authors take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, H.H., Kotsenas, A.L., Chen, J.V. et al. Multi-institutional Experience with Patient Image Access Through Electronic Health Record Patient Portals. J Digit Imaging 35, 320–326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00565-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00565-9