The shape and contour of the lesion are shown to be effective features for physicians to identify breast tumor as benign or malignant. The region of the lesion is usually manually created by the physician according to their clinical experience; therefore, contouring tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is difficult and time-consuming. For this purpose, an automatic contouring method for breast tumors was developed for less burden in the analysis and to decrease the observed bias to help in making decisions clinically. In this study, a multiview segmentation method for detecting and contouring breast tumors in MRI was represented. The preprocessing of the proposed method reduces any amount of noises but preserves the shape and contrast of the breast tumor. The two-dimensional (2D) level-set segmentation method extracts contours of breast tumors from the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes. The obtained contours are further utilized to generate appropriate three-dimensional (3D) contours. Twenty breast tumor cases were evaluated and the simulation results show that the proposed contouring method was an efficient method for delineating 3D contours of breast tumors in MRI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
ACS: Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2017
Heller SL, Heacock L, Moy L: Developments in breast imaging: update on new and evolving MR imaging and molecular imaging techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:247–258, 2018
Kuhl C: The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378, 2007
Morris EA: Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:57–74, 2010
Park VY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH: Breast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women with a personal history of breast cancer: outcomes stratified by interval between definitive surgery and surveillance MR imaging. BMC Cancer 18(91):91, 2018
Seidenwurm D, Breslau J: Recall rate benchmark for screening breast MR imaging in community practice. Radiology 286:728–729, 2018
Sezgin M, Sankur B: Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13:146–168, 2004
Otsu N: Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9:62–66, 1979
Canny J: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8:679–698, 1986
Perona P, Malik J: Scale-space and edge-detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12:629–639, 1990
Huang YL, Chen DR, Chang SC: Three-dimensional region-based segmentation for breast tumors on sonography. J Ultrasound Med 32:835–846, 2013
Woods RCGaRE: Digital Image Processing 3nd Edition. Chapter 104 Region Growing Segmentation: 763–769, 2008
Chan TF, Vese LA: Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10:266–277, 2001
Chang RF, Wu WJ, Tseng CC, Chen DR, Moon WK: 3-D snake for US in margin evaluation for malignant breast tumor excision using Mammotome. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7:197–201, 2003
Huang YL, Jiang YR, Chen DR, Moon WK: Level set contouring for breast tumor in sonography. J Digit Imaging 20:238–247, 2007
Wang C-M, Huang C-L, Yang S-C: 3D shape-weighted level set method for breast MRI 3D tumor segmentation. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2018(15):1–15, 2018
Ray KM, Hayward JH, Joe BN: Role of MR imaging for the locoregional staging of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:191–205, 2018
Ercelebi E, Koc S: Lifting-based wavelet domain adaptive wiener filter for image enhancement. IEE P-Vis Image Sign 153:31–36, 2006
Woods RCGaRE: Digital Image Processing 3rd edition. Chapter 58 Minimum Mean Square Error (Wiener) Filtering:352–357, 2008
Osher S, Sethian JA: Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed—algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79:12–49, 1988
Li CM, Kao CY, Gore JC, Ding ZH: Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17:1940–1949, 2008
Li CM, Xu CY, Gui CF, Fox MD: Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 19:3243–3254, 2010
Li CM, Huang R, Ding ZH, Gatenby JC, Metaxas DN, Gore JC: A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20:2007–2016, 2011
Anbeek P, Vincken KL, van Osch MJP, Bisschops RHC, van der Grond J: Probabilistic segmentation of white lesions in MR imaging. Neuroimage 21:1037–1044, 2004
Bordes A, Bory AM, Benchaib M, Rudigoz RC, Salle B: Reproducibility of transvaginal three-dimensional endometrial volume measurements with virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) during ovarian stimulation. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 19:76–80, 2002
Raine-Fenning NJ, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Bunkheila AK, Campbell BK, Johnson IR: The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:283–291, 2003
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 106-2221-E-029-029.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, D., Chang, Y., Wu, H. et al. Multiview Contouring for Breast Tumor on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Digit Imaging 32, 713–727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00190-7
- Breast cancer
- Image segmentation
- Level-set method
- Multiview contouring