Multiview Contouring for Breast Tumor on Magnetic Resonance Imaging


The shape and contour of the lesion are shown to be effective features for physicians to identify breast tumor as benign or malignant. The region of the lesion is usually manually created by the physician according to their clinical experience; therefore, contouring tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is difficult and time-consuming. For this purpose, an automatic contouring method for breast tumors was developed for less burden in the analysis and to decrease the observed bias to help in making decisions clinically. In this study, a multiview segmentation method for detecting and contouring breast tumors in MRI was represented. The preprocessing of the proposed method reduces any amount of noises but preserves the shape and contrast of the breast tumor. The two-dimensional (2D) level-set segmentation method extracts contours of breast tumors from the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes. The obtained contours are further utilized to generate appropriate three-dimensional (3D) contours. Twenty breast tumor cases were evaluated and the simulation results show that the proposed contouring method was an efficient method for delineating 3D contours of breast tumors in MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18


  1. 1.

    ACS: Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Heller SL, Heacock L, Moy L: Developments in breast imaging: update on new and evolving MR imaging and molecular imaging techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:247–258, 2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kuhl C: The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Morris EA: Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 18:57–74, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Park VY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH: Breast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women with a personal history of breast cancer: outcomes stratified by interval between definitive surgery and surveillance MR imaging. BMC Cancer 18(91):91, 2018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Seidenwurm D, Breslau J: Recall rate benchmark for screening breast MR imaging in community practice. Radiology 286:728–729, 2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sezgin M, Sankur B: Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13:146–168, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Otsu N: Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 9:62–66, 1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Canny J: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8:679–698, 1986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Perona P, Malik J: Scale-space and edge-detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12:629–639, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang YL, Chen DR, Chang SC: Three-dimensional region-based segmentation for breast tumors on sonography. J Ultrasound Med 32:835–846, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Woods RCGaRE: Digital Image Processing 3nd Edition. Chapter 104 Region Growing Segmentation: 763–769, 2008

  13. 13.

    Chan TF, Vese LA: Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10:266–277, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chang RF, Wu WJ, Tseng CC, Chen DR, Moon WK: 3-D snake for US in margin evaluation for malignant breast tumor excision using Mammotome. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7:197–201, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang YL, Jiang YR, Chen DR, Moon WK: Level set contouring for breast tumor in sonography. J Digit Imaging 20:238–247, 2007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang C-M, Huang C-L, Yang S-C: 3D shape-weighted level set method for breast MRI 3D tumor segmentation. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2018(15):1–15, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ray KM, Hayward JH, Joe BN: Role of MR imaging for the locoregional staging of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:191–205, 2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ercelebi E, Koc S: Lifting-based wavelet domain adaptive wiener filter for image enhancement. IEE P-Vis Image Sign 153:31–36, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Woods RCGaRE: Digital Image Processing 3rd edition. Chapter 58 Minimum Mean Square Error (Wiener) Filtering:352–357, 2008

  20. 20.

    Osher S, Sethian JA: Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed—algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79:12–49, 1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li CM, Kao CY, Gore JC, Ding ZH: Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17:1940–1949, 2008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li CM, Xu CY, Gui CF, Fox MD: Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 19:3243–3254, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li CM, Huang R, Ding ZH, Gatenby JC, Metaxas DN, Gore JC: A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20:2007–2016, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Anbeek P, Vincken KL, van Osch MJP, Bisschops RHC, van der Grond J: Probabilistic segmentation of white lesions in MR imaging. Neuroimage 21:1037–1044, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bordes A, Bory AM, Benchaib M, Rudigoz RC, Salle B: Reproducibility of transvaginal three-dimensional endometrial volume measurements with virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) during ovarian stimulation. Ultrasound Obst Gyn 19:76–80, 2002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Raine-Fenning NJ, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Bunkheila AK, Campbell BK, Johnson IR: The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three-dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:283–291, 2003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. MOST 106-2221-E-029-029.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Len Huang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, D., Chang, Y., Wu, H. et al. Multiview Contouring for Breast Tumor on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Digit Imaging 32, 713–727 (2019).

Download citation


  • Breast cancer
  • MRI
  • Image segmentation
  • Level-set method
  • Multiview contouring