Limitations in and Solutions for Improving the Functionality of Picture Archiving and Communication System: an Exploratory Study of PACS Professionals’ Perspectives
Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) technology is evolving leading to improvements in the PACS functionality. However, the needs and expectations of PACS users are increasing to cope with the rising demands for improving the workflow and enhancing efficiency in healthcare. The aim was to study the limitations in the current generation of PACS and solutions for improving PACS functionality. This was a longitudinal online observational study of the perspectives of PACS professionals accessed through four online discussion groups on PACS using the LinkedIn network. In this exploratory study, the methodology involved a thematic analysis of qualitative data comprising 250 online posts/comments made by 124 unique PACS professionals collected between January 2014 and December 2015. Participants were mostly male (n = 119, 96%) from the North America (n = 88, 71%). Key themes on limitations in the current generation of PACS were image transmission problems, network and hardware issues, difficulties in changing specific settings, issues in hardcoded Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine attributes, and problems in implementing open source PACS. Main themes on solutions for improving PACS functionality were the integration of multisite PACS, multimedia for PACS, web-based PACS, medical image viewer, open source PACS, PACS on mobile phones, vendor neutral archives for PACS, speech recognition and integration in PACS, PACS backup and recovery, and connecting PACS with other hospital systems. Despite ongoing technological developments, the current generation of PACS has limitations that affect PACS functionality leading to unmet needs and requirements of PACS users, which could impact workflow and efficiency in healthcare.
KeywordsPACS technology Digital medical imaging Electronic images Radiology workflow Ubiquitous PACS Online access
The authors wish to thank to the moderators of LinkedIn based four online discussion groups on PACS for allowing access to their discussions and posts and harnessing their conversations for this study.
MA collected and analysed data and drafted the manuscript. SGSS revisited the data and data analysis and extensively revised and finalised the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ministry of Health, State of Kuwait awarded a scholarship to MA for doctoral studies.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was a part of doctoral research by MA and ethics approval was provided by the Research Ethics Committee of School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics at Brunel University London in July 2014.
- 6.Huang HK: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010Google Scholar
- 7.Duerinckx AJ: Introduction to two PACS’ 82 Panel Discussions edited by André J. Duerinckx “Equipment Manufacturers’ View on PACS” and “The Medical Community’s View on PACS”. J Digit Imaging 16:29–31, 2003Google Scholar
- 10.Mendel JB, Schweitzer AL: PACS for the developing world. J Glob Radiol 1:5, 2015Google Scholar
- 14.Schooley B, Hikmet N, Atilgan E: Health IT Maturity and Hospital Quality: Effects of PACS Automation and Integration Levels on US Hospital Performance. Proc. The 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI 2016) Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, Dec 15–17, 2016 YearGoogle Scholar
- 18.Godinho TM, Almeida E, Silva LAB, Costa C: Integrating multiple data sources in a cardiology imaging laboratory. Proc. e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on: Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 24.LinkedIn Corporation About LinkedIn. Available at https://press.linkedin.com/about-linkedin. Accessed 2nd August 2018.
- 27.QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo qualitative data analysis Software, 2012Google Scholar
- 33.Braun V, Clarke V: Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage, 2013Google Scholar
- 34.Matar R, Renapurkar R, Obuchowski N, Menon V, Piraino D, Schoenhagen P: Utility of hand-held devices in diagnosis and triage of cardiovascular emergencies. Observations during implementation of a PACS-based system in an acute aortic syndrome (AAS) network. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9:524–533, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Gray M: ACS Paradigm Shift: Moving control of the data from display applications to an enterprise access infrastructure. Context Magazine:1–16, 2014Google Scholar
- 45.Cook R: Is VNA the future of image delivery? A platform independent archival system has strong appeal. Healthcare IT News, 2014Google Scholar
- 46.Digital Health Intelligence Limited Special Report: VNA and Data Storage. Available at https://www.digitalhealth.net/2016/11/special-report-vendor-neutral-archiving/. Accessed 2nd August 2018.
- 47.Kagadis GC et al.: Cloud computing in medical imaging. Med Phys 070901:40, 2013Google Scholar
- 50.NHS Digital NHS Digital publishes guidance on data off-shoring and cloud computing for health and social care. Available at https://digital.nhs.uk/news-and-events/latest-news/nhs-digital-publishes-guidance-on-data-off-shoring-and-cloud-computing-for-health-and-social-care. Accessed 2nd August 2018.
- 53.Torrieri M: Talk vs. Type: Taking Another Look at Voice Recognition. Physicians Practice 21, 2011Google Scholar
- 56.Hwang I-C, Lee KW, Park SS, Chanthanoulay S, Sisavanh M, Rajpho V, Kim M, Billamay S, Phangmanixay S, Oudavong B: The first picture archiving and communication system in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Changes in the utilization rate of imaging tests in the first year after implementation. Int J Med Inform 94:31–38, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.Chunn T, Honeyman J: Chapter 9. Storage and Database. Bellingham: Spie Press, 2000Google Scholar
- 63.Thurston S: ASP Configuration Handbook. A Guide for ISPs. Syngress: Rockland, 2001Google Scholar
- 64.Martin G, Ghafur S, Kinross J, Hankin C, Darzi A: WannaCry—a year on. BMJ 361, 2018Google Scholar