Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a More Responsive Radiology Resident Dashboard

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residents have a limited time to be trained. Although having a highly variable caseload should be beneficial for resident training, residents do not necessarily get a uniform distribution of cases. By developing a dashboard where residents and their attendings can track the procedures they have done and cases that they have seen, we hope to give residents a greater insight into their training and into where gaps in their training may be occurring. By taking advantage of modern advances in NLP techniques, we process medical records and generate statistics describing each resident’s progress so far. We have built the system described and its life within the NYP ecosystem. By creating better tracking, we hope that caseloads can be shifted to better close any individual gaps in training. One of the educational pain points for radiology residency is the assignment of cases to match a well-balanced curriculum. By illuminating the historical cases of a resident, we can better assign future cases for a better educational experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhargavan M, Kaye AH, Forman HP, Sunshine JH: Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006–2007 and trends since 1991–1992. Radiology 252(2):458–467, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Willatt JMG, Mason AC: Comparison of radiology residency programs in ten countries. Eur Radiol 16(2):437–444, 2006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Denny JC, Smithers JD, Miller RA, Spickard, III A: Understanding medical school curriculum content using KnowledgeMap. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(4):351–362, 2003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Farkas R, Szarvas G: Automatic construction of rule-based ICD-9-CM coding systems. BMC Bioinformatics 9(Suppl. 3):S10, 2008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira S, Névéol A, Massari P, Joubert M, Darmoni S: Construction of a semi-automated ICD-10 coding help system to optimize medical and economic coding. Stud Health Technol Inform 124:845–850, 2006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Franz P, Zaiss A, Schulz S, Hahn U, Klar R: Automated coding of diagnoses--three methods compared. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:250–254, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lussier YA, Shagina L, Friedman C: Automating icd-9-cm encoding using medical language processing: A feasibility study. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:1072, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman C, Shagina L, Lussier Y, Hripcsak G: Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11(5):392–402, 2004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wibowo W, Williams HE: Simple and accurate feature selection for hierarchical categorisation. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Document engineering 2002:111–118

  10. Ramos J: Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In: Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning, 2003, 242:133–142

  11. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hofmann T: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. ACM SIGIR Forum 51(2):211–218, 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI: Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(Jan):993–1022, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C: Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proc EMNLP Conf 2014:1532–1543, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 26:3111–3119, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 25:1097–1105, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simard PY, Steinkraus D, Platt JC: Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. ICDAR 3:958–962, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78(1):73–87, 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Shih.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Gangaram, V. & Shih, G. Developing a More Responsive Radiology Resident Dashboard. J Digit Imaging 32, 81–90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0123-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0123-6

Keywords

Navigation