DeSantis C, Ma J, Sauer AG et al.: Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin 67(6):439–448, 2017
Article
Google Scholar
Pal T, Permuth-Wey J, Betts JA, Krischer JP, Fiorica J, Arango H, LaPolla J, Hoffman M, Martino MA, Wakeley K, Wilbanks G, Nicosia S, Cantor A, Sutphen R: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases. Cancer 104(12):2807–2816, 2005
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn MJ, Lynch P, McTiernan A, Offit K, Perlman J, Petersen G, Thomson E, Varricchio C: Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer genetics studies consortium. JAMA 277(12):997–1003, 1997
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schairer C, Lubin J, Troisi R, Sturgeon S, Brinton L, Hoover R: Menopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. JAMA 283(4):485–491, 2000
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Carter C, Hoover R: Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(2):103–110, 2001
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
McCormack VA, dos Santos SI: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(6):1159–1169, 2006
Article
Google Scholar
Boyd N, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Maudsley G, Peressotti C, Yaffe M, Minkin S: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(6):1754–1762, 2009
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American College of Radiology: Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 5th edition. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2013
Google Scholar
King V, Brooks JD, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Pike MC, Morris EA: Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. Radiology 260(1):50–60, 2011
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dontchos BN, Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Korde LA, Lam DL, Scheel JR, Peacock S, Lehman CD: Are qualitative assessments of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue on MR images, and mammographic density associated with breast cancer risk? Radiology 276(2):371–380, 2015
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Melsaether A, McDermott M, Gupta D, Pysarenko K, Shaylor SD, Moy L: Inter- and intrareader agreement for categorization of background parenchymal enhancement at baseline and after training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203(1):209–215, 2014
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ha R, Mema E, Guo X, Mango V, Desperito E, Ha J, Wynn R, Zhao B: Quantitative 3D breast magnetic resonance imaging fibroglandular tissue analysis and correlation with qualitative assessments: a feasibility study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 6(2):144–150, 2016
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ha R, Mema E, Guo X, Mango V, Desperito E, Ha J, Wynn R, Zhao B: Three-dimensional quantitative validation of breast magnetic resonance imaging background parenchymal enhancement assessments. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 45(5):297–303, 2016
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mema E, Mango V, Guo X et al.: Does breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement indicate metabolic activity? Qualitative and 3D quantitative computer imaging analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 47(3):753–759, 2018
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clendenen TV, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Moy L, Pike MC, Rusinek H, Kim S: Comparison of 3-point Dixon imaging and fuzzy C-means clustering methods for breast density measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 38(2):474–481, 2013
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Eyal E, Badikhi D, Furman-Haran E, Kelcz F, Kirshenbaum KJ, Degani H: Principal component analysis of breast DCE-MRI adjustedwith a model-based method. J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):989–998, 2009
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
LeChun Y, Bengio T, Hinton G: Deep learning. Nature 521:436–444, 2015
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI), springer. LNCS 9351:234–241, 2015
Google Scholar
Çiçek O, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp S et al.: 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI), springer. LNCS 9901:424–432, Oct 2016
Google Scholar
He K, Zhang X, Ren S et al.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. ArxivOrg [Internet]. 7(3):171–180, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53%5Cn
http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.2901%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/44feb4b1-873a-4443-8baa-1730ecd16291
Springenberg JT, Dosovitskiy A, Brox T, et al. Striving for simplicity: the all convolutional net. 2014 Dec 21 [cited 2017 Jul 21]; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6806
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. “Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification,” arXiv:1502.01852, (2015).
Kingma DP, Ba J, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG], December 2014.
Gubern-Mérida A, Kallenberg M, Mann RM et al.: Breast segmentation and density estimation in breast MRI: a fully automatic framework. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19(1):349–357, 2015
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Yuanjie Zheng, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC: N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 29(6):1310–1320, 2010 Jun
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar