Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creation of User and Context-Specific Uncertainty Profiles

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While uncertainty is ubiquitous in medical practice, minimal work to date has been performed to analyze the cause and effect relationship between uncertainty and patient outcomes. In medical imaging practice, uncertainty in the radiology report has been well documented to be a source of clinician dissatisfaction. Before one can effectively create intervention strategies aimed at reducing uncertainty, it must first be better understood through context- and user-specific analysis. One strategy for accomplishing this task is to characterize the source of uncertainty and create user-specific uncertainty profiles which take into account a number of provider-specific variables which may contribute to report uncertainty. The resulting data can in turn be used to create real-time report uncertainty metrics aimed at providing uncertainty analytics at the point of care, for the combined purposes of decision support, improved communication, and enhanced clinical/economic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carney PA, Yi JP, Abraham LA et al.: Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography. J Gen Intern Med 22:234–241, 2007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang SY, Chan WP: Uncertainty and its consequences in clinical practice. J Korean Med Sci 30:1710–1712, 2015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiner B: Quantitative analysis of uncertainty in medical reporting. J Digit Imaging 2017 (Submitted for publication)

  4. Woodhams J, Toye K: An empirical test of the assumptions of case linkage and offender profiling with serial commercial robberies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 13:59–85, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Argamon S, Koppel M: A systematic functional approach to automated authorship analysis. Journal of law and Policy 21:299–316, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Halteren H: Linguistic profiling for authorship recognition and verification. In: Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the ACL. East Stroudsburg: PA:ACL, pp. 199–206

  7. Douglas JE, Burgess AE: Criminal profiling: a viable investigative tool against violent crime. FBL Law Enforcement Bulletin 55:9–13, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reiner B: Contextualizing causation of uncertainty in medical reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2017 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce I. Reiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reiner, B.I. Quantifying Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creation of User and Context-Specific Uncertainty Profiles. J Digit Imaging 31, 379–382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0057-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0057-z

Keywords

Navigation