Abstract
Building and maintaining a comprehensive yet simple set of standardized protocols for a cross-sectional image can be a daunting task. A single department may have difficulty preventing “protocol creep,” which almost inevitably occurs when an organized “playbook” of protocols does not exist and individual radiologists and technologists alter protocols at will and on a case-by-case basis. When multiple departments or groups function in a large health system, the lack of uniformity of protocols can increase exponentially. In 2012, the University of Colorado Hospital formed a large health system (UCHealth) and became a 5-hospital provider network. CT and MR imaging studies are conducted at multiple locations by different radiology groups. To facilitate consistency in ordering, acquisition, and appearance of a given study, regardless of location, we minimized the number of protocols across all scanners and sites of practice with a clinical indication-driven protocol selection and standardization process. Here we review the steps utilized to perform this process improvement task and insure its stability over time. Actions included creation of a standardized protocol template, which allowed for changes in electronic storage and management of protocols, designing a change request form, and formation of a governance structure. We utilized rapid improvement events (1 day for CT, 2 days for MR) and reduced 248 CT protocols into 97 standardized protocols and 168 MR protocols to 66. Additional steps are underway to further standardize output and reporting of imaging interpretation. This will result in an improved, consistent radiologist, patient, and provider experience across the system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cody DD, Pfeiffer D, McNitt-Gray MF, Ruckdeschel TG, Strauss KJ, Wilcox P: CT quality control manual. ACR, Reston, 2012
Revised requirements for diagnostic imaging services; 2013. The Joint Commission on Prepublication Requirements. Available at: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/PREPUB-12-20-2013-DiagImaging_ HAP_CAH.pdf
Kofler JM, Cody DD, Morin RL: CT protocol review and optimization. J Am Coll Radiol 11(3):267–70, 2014
Trattner S, Pearson GDN, Chin C, et al: Standardization and Optimization of CT Protocols to Achieve Low Dose. J Am Coll Radiol 11(3):271–78, 2014
Szczykutowicz TP, Bour RK, Pozniak M, Ranallo FN: Compliance with AAPM Practice Guideline 1.a: CT Protocol Management and Review - from the perspective of a university hospital. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(2):5023, 2015
Zhang D, Savage CA, Li X, Liu B: Data-driven CT protocol review and management—experience from a large academic hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 12(3):267–72, 2015
Szczykutowicz TP, Rubert N, Belden D, et al: A Wiki Based CT Protocol Management System. Radiol Manage 37(6):25–9, 2015
Szczykutowicz TP, Siegelman J: On the same page--physicist and radiologist perspectives on protocol management and review. J Am Coll Radiol 12(8):808–14, 2015
Szczykutowicz TP, Bour RK, Rubert N, Wendt G, Pozniak M, Ranallo FN: CT protocol management: simplifying the process by using a master protocol concept. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(4):5412, 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sachs, P.B., Hunt, K., Mansoubi, F. et al. CT and MR Protocol Standardization Across a Large Health System: Providing a Consistent Radiologist, Patient, and Referring Provider Experience. J Digit Imaging 30, 11–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9895-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9895-8