Skip to main content
Log in

Patient Perceptions of Participating in the RSNA Image Share Project: a Preliminary Study

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to gauge patient perceptions of the RSNA Image Share Project (ISP), a pilot program that provides patients access to their imaging studies online via secure Personal Health Record (PHR) accounts. Two separate Institutional Review Board exempted surveys were distributed to patients depending on whether they decided to enroll or opt out of enrollment in the ISP. For patients that enrolled, a survey gauged baseline computer usage, perceptions of online access to images through the ISP, effect of patient access to images on patient-physician relationships, and interest in alternative use of images. The other survey documented the age and reasons for declining participation for those that opted out of enrolling in the ISP. Out of 564 patients, 470 enrolled in the ISP (83 % participation rate) and 456 of these 470 individuals completed the survey for a survey participation rate of 97 %. Patients who enrolled overwhelmingly perceived access to online images as beneficial and felt it bolstered their patient-physician relationship. Out of 564 patients, 94 declined enrollment in the ISP and all 94 individuals completed the survey for a survey participation rate of 100 %. Patients who declined to participate in the ISP cited unreliable access to Internet and existing availability of non-web-based intra-network images to their physicians. Patients who participated in the ISP found having a measure of control over their images to be beneficial and felt that patient-physician relationships could be negatively affected by challenges related to image accessibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morin RL: Outside images on CD: a management nightmare. J Am Coll Radiol 2:958, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flanagan PT, Relyea-Chew A, Gross JA, Gunn ML: Using the Internet for image transfer in a regional trauma network: effect on CT repeat rate, cost, and radiation exposure. J Am Coll Radiol 9:648–656, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung JC, Sodickson A, Ledbetter S: Outside CT imaging among emergency radiology transfer patients. J Am Coll Radiol 6:626–632, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sodickson A, Opraseuth J, Ledbetter S: Outside imaging in emergency department transfer patients: CD import reduces rates of subsequent imaging utilization. Radiology 260:408–413, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Macura KJ, Carrino JA, Kahn Jr, CE: Reviewing images from portable media: an ongoing challenge. J Am Coll Radiol 6:61–64, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emick DM, Carey TS, Charles AG, Shapiro ML: Repeat imaging in trauma transfers: a retrospective analysis of computed tomography scans repeated upon arrival to a level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1255–1262, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrington DT, Connolly M, Biffl WL, Majercik SD, Cioffi WG: Transfer times to definitive care facilities are too long-a consequence of an immature trauma system. Ann Surg 241:961–966, 2005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Young AJ, Meyers KS, Wolfe L, Duane TM: Repeat computed tomography for trauma patients undergoing transfer to a level I trauma center. Am Surg 78:675–678, 2012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee CY, Bernard AC, Fryman L, Coughenour J, Costich J, Boulanger B, Chang P, Kearney PA: Imaging may delay transfer of rural trauma victims: a survey of referring physicians. J Trauma 65:1359–1363, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haley T, Ghaemmaghami V, Loftus T, Gerkin RD, Sterrett R, Ferrara JJ: Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. Am J Surg 198:858–862, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matin A, Bates DW, Sussman A, Ros P, Hanson R, Khorasani R: Inpatient radiology utilization: trends over the past decade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:7–11, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. RSNA Image Share. Radiological Society of North America. Available at http://www.rsna.org/Image_Share.aspx. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  13. RSNA Image Share: Letting patients take control of their medical images. Radiological Society of North America. Available at http://rsnaimageshare.org/downloads/3.0/RSNAImageShareNetworkExecutiveOverview3.0.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2014.

  14. Delbanco T, Walker J: A must-read. Patients should have easier access to their doctors’ medical notes. Mod Healthc 41:22, 2011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kavoussi SC, Huang JJ, Tsai JC, Kempton JE: HIPAA for physicians in the information age. Conn Med 78:425–427, 2014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omer Awan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None

Additional information

Grant: 2013 RSNA Research Medical Student Grant

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiremath, A., Awan, O., Mendelson, D. et al. Patient Perceptions of Participating in the RSNA Image Share Project: a Preliminary Study. J Digit Imaging 29, 189–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9832-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9832-2

Keywords

Navigation