Abstract
The increasing use of medical checklists to promote patient safety raises the question of their utility in diagnostic radiology. This study evaluates the efficacy of a checklist-style reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine CT examinations. A checklist-style reporting template for cervical spine CTs was created at our institution and mandated for resident preliminary reports. Ten months after implementation of the template, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of emergent pathology missed on reports generated with and without the checklist-style reporting template. In 1,832 reports generated without using the checklist-style template, 25 (17.6 %) out of 142 emergent findings were missed. In 1,081 reports generated using the checklist-style template, 13 (11.9 %) out of 109 emergent findings were missed. The decrease in missed pathology was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, larger differences were noted in the detection of emergent non-fracture findings, with 17 (28.3 %) out of 60 findings missed on reports without use of the checklist template and 5 (9.3 %) out of 54 findings missed on reports using the checklist template, representing a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings (p = 0.01). The use of a checklist-style structured reporting template resulted in a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings on cervical spine CTs. The lack of statistically significant change in missed fractures was expected given that residents’ search patterns naturally include fracture detection. Our findings suggest that the use of checklists in structured reporting may increase diagnostic accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Gagliardi RA: The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(2):501–502, 1995
Hobby JL, Tom BD, Todd C, et al: Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports. Br J Radiol 73:999–1001, 2000
Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH: Survey of hospital clinicians’ preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64(4):386–394, 2009. 395-396
Sierra AE, Bisesi MA, Rosenbaum TL, et al: Readability of the radiologic report. Invest Radiol 27:236–239, 1992
Sobel JL, Pearson ML, Gross K, et al: Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3:709–717, 1996
Groom RC, Morton JR: Outcomes analysis in cardiac surgery. Perfusion 12:257–261, 1997
Tobler HG, Sethi GK, Grover FL, et al: Variations in processes and structures in cardiac surgery practice. Med Care 33(10):OS43–OS58, 1995
Weiss DL, Langlotz CP: Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249(3):739–747, 2008
Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Selter SE: Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol 10(6):685–688, 2003
Kong A, Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C: How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med 315(12):740–744, 1986
Liu D, Berman GD, Gray RN: The use of structured radiology reporting at a community hospital: a 4-year case study of more than 200,000 reports. Appl Radiol 32(7):23–26, 2003
Naik SS, Handbridge A, Wilson SR: Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598, 2001
Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H: Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260(1):174–181, 2011
Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al: An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 355:2725–2732, 2006
Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, et al: Collaborative cohort study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:305–314, 2011
Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W: Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 20(1):22–30, 2008
Hart EM, Owen H: Errors and omissions in anesthesia: a pilot study using a pilot’s checklist. Anesth Analg 101:246–250, 2005
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al: A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499, 2009
Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B, et al: Getting teams to talk: development and prior implementation of a checklist to promote interpersonal communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346, 2005
Van Roozendaal BW, Krass I: Development of an evidence-based checklist for the detection of drug related problems in type 2 diabetes. Pharm World Sci 31(5):580–595, 2009
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) radiology reporting initiative. Available at http://www.radreport.org/specialty/nr. Accessed 26 November 2010
Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B: Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253(1):74–80, 2009
Langlotz CP: Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet? Radiology 253(1):23–25, 2009
McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, et al: The Hawthorne effect: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:30, 2007
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Christopher Moosavi, MD and Shain Wallis, MD for their work on the checklist-style structured reporting template. The authors also thank David Lucido, PhD for his assistance with the statistical analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, E., Powell, D.K. & Kagetsu, N.J. Efficacy of a Checklist-Style Structured Radiology Reporting Template in Reducing Resident Misses on Cervical Spine Computed Tomography Examinations. J Digit Imaging 27, 588–593 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2