Abstract
This study investigates the incidence of full-field digital mammographic (FFDM) artifacts with three systems at two institutions and compares the artifacts between two detector types and two grid types. A total of 4,440 direct and 4,142 indirect FFDM images were reviewed by two radiologists, and artifacts were classified as patient related, hardware related, and software processing. The overall incidence of FFDM artifacts was 3.4 % (292/8,582). Patient related artifacts (motion artifacts and skin line artifacts) were the most commonly detected types (1.7 %). Underexposure among hardware related artifacts and high-density artifacts among software processing artifacts also were common (0.7 and 0.5 %, respectively). These artifacts, specific to digital mammography, were more common with the direct detector type and the crossed air grid type than with the indirect type and linear grid type (p < 0.05). The most common mammographic artifacts on FFDM were patient related, which might be controlled by the instruction of a patient and technologist. Underexposure and high-density artifacts were more common with direct detector and crossed air type of grid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayyala RS, Chorlton M, Behrman RH, Kornguth PJ, Slanetz PJ: Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them? Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 28:1999–2008, 2008
Geiser WR, Haygood TM, Santiago L, Stephens T, Thames D, Whitman GJ: Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W1023–W1030, 2011
Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E: Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol 12:1697–1702, 2002
Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Mawdsley GE, Hunter DM, Beideck DJ: Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system. Med Phys 33:2998–3005, 2006
Van Ongeval C, Jacobs J, Bosmans H: Artifacts in digital mammography. JBR-BTR: organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR) 91:262–263, 2008
Boone JM, et al: Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography. Technol Cancer Res Treat 1:441–447, 2002
Hurtienne B. Ask Anne: changing mammography techniques for digital mammography. http://blog.carestreamhealth.com/-EverythingRad. Accessed December 9, 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, J.J., Kim, S.H., Kang, B.J. et al. Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Digital Mammography. J Digit Imaging 27, 231–236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9641-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9641-4