Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 815–818 | Cite as

Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) as a Radiology Reporting Tool by Using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Macro Program



The objectives are (1) to introduce a new concept of making a quantitative computed tomography (QCT) reporting system by using optical character recognition (OCR) and macro program and (2) to illustrate the practical usages of the QCT reporting system in radiology reading environment. This reporting system was created as a development tool by using an open-source OCR software and an open-source macro program. The main module was designed for OCR to report QCT images in radiology reading process. The principal processes are as follows: (1) to save a QCT report as a graphic file, (2) to recognize the characters from an image as a text, (3) to extract the T scores from the text, (4) to perform error correction, (5) to reformat the values into QCT radiology reporting template, and (6) to paste the reports into the electronic medical record (EMR) or picture archiving and communicating system (PACS). The accuracy test of OCR was performed on randomly selected QCTs. QCT as a radiology reporting tool successfully acted as OCR of QCT. The diagnosis of normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis is also determined. Error correction of OCR is done with AutoHotkey-coded module. The results of T scores of femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae had an accuracy of 100 and 95.4 %, respectively. A convenient QCT reporting system could be established by utilizing open-source OCR software and open-source macro program. This method can be easily adapted for other QCT applications and PACS/EMR.


Computer in medicine PACS OCR QCT Reading room 


  1. 1.
    Adams JE: Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 71:415–424, 2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Optical character recognition . Wikipedia. Available at Accessed 24 Jun 2011
  3. 3.
    AutoHotkey Web site. Available at Accessed 24 Jun 2011
  4. 4.
    GOCR Web site. Available at Accessed 24 Jun 2011
  5. 5.
    Kanis JA, Melton 3rd, LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N: The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129, 1994Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee YH: Efficient radiologic reading environment by using an open-source macro program as connection software. Eur J Radiol 81:100–103, 2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sistrom C, Honeyman-Buck J: A simple method for importing multiple image files into PowerPoint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1591–1596, 2004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yam CS: Simple method for inserting Flash movies into PowerPoint presentations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:W374–W378, 2007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li X, Zhang D, Liu B: Automated extraction of radiation dose information from CT dose report images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W781–W783, 2011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Medical Convergence Research Institute, and Severance Biomedical Science InstituteYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations