Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 782–791

Efficient Denoising Technique for CT images to Enhance Brain Hemorrhage Segmentation

Article

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive denoising approach aiming to improve the visibility and detectability of hemorrhage from brain computed tomography (CT) images. The suggested approach fuses the images denoised by total variation (TV) method, denoised by curvelet-based method, and edge information extracted from the noise residue of TV method. The edge information is extracted from the noise residue of TV method by processing it through curvelet transform. The visual interpretation shows that the proposed approach not only reduces the staircase effect caused by total variation method but also reduces visual distortion induced by curvelet transform in the homogeneous areas of the CT images. The denoising abilities of the proposed method are further evaluated by segmenting the hemorrhagic brain area using region-growing method. The sensitivity, specificity, Jaccard index, and Dice coefficients were calculated for different noise levels. The comparative results show that the significant improvement has yielded in the brain hemorrhage detection from CT images after denoising it with the proposed approach.

Keywords

Curvelet transform Total variation Computed tomography 

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen W, Wayman L: Computed tomography of intracranial hemorrhage. Neuro Imaging Clin N Am 2:75–87, 1992Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gravel P, Beaudoin G, De Guise JA: A method for modeling noise in medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(10):1221–1232, 2004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lei T, Sewchand W: Statistical approach to X-ray CT imaging and its applications in image analysis—part I: statistical analysis of X-ray CT imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11(1):53–61, 1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee JS: Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by using local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, PAMI 2(2):165–168, 1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perona P, Malik J: Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rudin LI, Osher S, Fatemi E: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D 60:259–268, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chambolle A: An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications. J Math Imaging Vision 20:89–97, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donoho DL: Denoising by soft thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabbani H, Nezafat R, Gazor S: Wavelet domain medical image denoising using bivariate Laplacian mixture model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(12):2826–2837, 2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borsdorf A, Raupach R, Flohr T, Hornegger J: Wavelet based noise reduction in CT images using correlation analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(12):1685–1703, 2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ali SA, Vathsal S, Kishore KL: Efficient denoising technique for CT Images using Window based multi-wavelet transformation and thresholding. Eur J Sci Res 48(2):315–325, 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donoho DL, Duncan MR: Digital curvelet transform: strategy, implementation and experiments. Standford University, 1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starck JL, Candes EJ, Donoho DL: The curvelet transform for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Proc 11(6):670–684, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Starck JL, Murtagh F, Candes EJ, Donoho DL: Gray and color image contrast enhancement by the curvelet transform. IEEE Trans Image Proc 12(6):706–717, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Candes EJ, Demanet L, Donoho DL, Ying L: Fast discrete curvelet transforms. 2005 http://www.curvelet.org.papers.FDCT.pdf
  16. 16.
    Aili W, Zhang Y, Shaoliang M, Mingji Y: Image denoising method based on curvelet transform. 3rd IEEE Conf Ind Electron Appl 571–574, 2008Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhadauria HS, Dewal ML, Anand RS: Comparative analysis of curvelet based techniques for denoising of computed tomography images. IEEE Int Conf Devices Commun (ICDeCom) 1–5, 2011Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhadauria HS, Dewal ML: Performance evaluation of curvelet and wavelet based denoising methods on brain computed tomography images. IEEE Int Conf Emerg Trends Electr Comput Technol (ICETECT) 666–670, 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holshneider M, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J, Tchamitchian P (1989) A real-time algorithm for signal analysis with the help of the wavelet transform. In: Wavelet, time–frequency methods and phase space. Springer: New York 389–297, 1989Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shensa MJ: The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the à trous and mallat algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 40(10):2464–2482, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deans SR: The radon transform and some of its application. Wiley, New York, 1983Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nason GP, Silverman BW: The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. Lecture notes in statistics 103, wavelets and statistics. Springer: New York 281–299, 1995Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li H, Wang S, Deng C: New image denoising method based on wavelet and curvelet transform. IEEE Conf Proc ICIE 136–139, 2009Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Metz C: Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–298, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaki WMDW, Fauzi MFA, Bessar R, Ahamad SHWM: Abnormalities detection in serial computed tomography brain images using multi-level segmentation approach. J Multimedia Tools Appl, 2010. doi:10.1007/s11042-010-0524-0. Springer

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations