Skip to main content
Log in

The Next Wave: Confexting

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiology conferences enable participants the opportunity to ask experts questions through question and answer (Q and A) sessions or individually. Given the time limitations and intimidating circumstances, we incorporated conference text messaging (confexting) as a method of increasing interactivity between the audience and speakers. During a 5-day radiology conference, text messaging was utilized for anonymous interactivity between the audience and speakers during Q and A sessions. There were 324 text messages; 76 of these were either follow-up statements or questions related to earlier text messages. Forty-two questions were submitted via paper notes. There was a general trend of an increasing number of text messages and a decreasing number of paper notes. The anonymous text messaging system was found to be an effective method for interactivity between the audience and the speakers. The questions and answers could be presented in a PowerPoint format at the formal Q and A sessions. Questions texted to the authors during their talks could be immediately answered or addressed in subsequent talks. Although difficult for some individuals to embrace technology, confexting allows for interactivity and prompts discussion. Confexting is an effective method for interactivity between the audience and speakers not previously utilized in a conference setting. The anonymity and asynchronous communication enable conference participants to submit more questions than in the traditional setting. The speakers may be able to explain more thoroughly difficult concepts more thoroughly with additional slides at Q and A sessions or may immediately answer texted questions during their talks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Rosenberg M, ed: E-learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM: The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. Mar 81(3):207–212, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tidmarsh PJ, Cummings J, Hersh WR, Freidman CP: Distributed medical informatics education using internet2. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:787–791

  4. Davidson HC, Wiggins RH: Radiology teaching presentation tools. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 24(6):420–427, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiggins RH: Personal digital assistants. J Digit Imaging 17(1):5–17, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rowell MR, Johnson PT, Fishman EK: Radiology education in 2005: world wide web practice patterns, perceptions, and preferences of radiologists. Radiographics 27(2):563–571, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education www.accme.org. Accessed 20 May 2011

  8. Weiner SJ, Jackson JL, Garten S: Measuring continuing medical education outcomes: a pilot study of effect size of three CME interventions at an SGIM annual meeting. J Gen Intern Med 24(5):626–629, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wiggins RH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LM, S., EP, Q. & RH, W. The Next Wave: Confexting. J Digit Imaging 25, 25–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9398-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9398-6

Keywords

Navigation