Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Stylus for Radiographic Image Annotation

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the use of a stylus as a computer interface for radiographic image annotation. Our case study concerned the annotation of spiculated lesions on mammograms. Three experienced radiologists annotated 20 mammograms depicting spiculated lesions. We evaluated the interobserver agreement in annotations marked with a stylus versus those marked with a mouse using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Better agreement in annotating spicule width was observed with the stylus, suggesting that it is easier to accurately annotate subtle regions on an image using a stylus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiner B, Siegel E: Radiology reporting: returning to our image-centric roots. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1151–1155, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng Y, Wu M, Cole E, Pisano ED: Online annotation tool for digital mammography. Acad Radiol 11:566–572, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampat MP, Bovik AC, Whitman GJ, Markey MK: A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography. Med Phys 35:2110–2123, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sampat MP, et al: The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. Br J Radiol 79:S134–S140, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P, Jr.: The digital database for screening mammography. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography

  6. ImageJ. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/

  7. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ: Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36–42, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGraw KO, Wong SP: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46, 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosner B: Fundamentals of Biostatistics, Belmont: Duxbury, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krupinski EA, Kallergi M: Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. Radiology 242:671–682, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by an Early Career Award from the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation. We thank the reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that have helped improve the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautam S. Muralidhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muralidhar, G.S., Whitman, G.J., Haygood, T.M. et al. Evaluation of Stylus for Radiographic Image Annotation. J Digit Imaging 23, 701–705 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9232-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9232-6

Key words

Navigation