Skip to main content
Log in

Optimising the Use of Computed Radiography in Pediatric Chest Imaging

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze image quality of chest examinations in pediatric patients using computed radiography (CR) obtained with a wide range of doses to suggest the appropriate parameters for optimal image quality. A sample of 240 chest images in four age ranges was randomly selected from the examinations performed during 2004. Images were obtained using a CR system and were evaluated independently by three radiologists. Each image was scored using criteria proposed by the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria in Pediatrics. Mean global scoring and scoring of individual criteria more sensitive to noise were used to evaluate image quality. Agfa dose level (DL) was in the range 1.20 to 2.85. It was found that there was not significant correlation (R < 0.5) between image quality and DL for any of the age ranges for either global score or for individual criteria more related to noise. The mean value of DL was in the ranges 1.9–2.1 for the four age bands. From this study, a DL value of 1.6 is proposed for pediatric CR chest imaging. This could yield a reduction of approximately a factor of 2.5 in mean patient entrance surface doses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.
Fig 4.
Fig 5.
Fig 6.
Fig 7.
Fig 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DL:

Dose level

CR:

Computed radiography

ICRP:

International Commission on Radiological Protection

PSP:

Photostimulable phosphor plate

ESD:

Entrance surface dose

HMD:

Hyaline membrane disease

References

  1. European Commission: Council directive 97/43/Euratom health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure. Off J Eur Communities L180:22–27, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Don S: Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S167–S172, 2004 Oct

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters SE, Brennan PC: Digital radiography: are the manufacturers’ settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index. Eur Radiol 12(9):2381–2387, 2002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Commission of the European Communities: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in pediatrics. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg), Report EUR 16261. CEC 1996.

  5. Schaetzing R: Management of pediatric radiation dose using Agfa computed radiography. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S207–S214, 2004 Oct

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. International Commission on Radiological Protection: Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP. Publication 93 Annals of the ICRP (2004).

  7. Huda W, Rill LN, Bruner AP: Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems. Med Phys 24(10):1621–1628, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agfa-Gevaert: ADC Compact Dose Monitoring Software User Manual. Mortsel, Belgium: Agfa-Gevaert, 1998

  9. Vano E, Fernandez JM, Ten JI, Guibelalde E, Gonzalez L, Pedrosa CS: Real-time measurement and audit of radiation dose to patients undergoing computed radiography. Radiology 225(1):283–288, 2002 Oct

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohamadain KEM et al: Dose evaluation for paediatric chest x-ray examinations in Brazil and Sudan: low doses and reliable examinations can be achieved in developing countries. Phys Med Biol 49:1017–1031, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vano E: ICRP recommendations on ‘Managing patient dose in digital radiology’. Radiat Prot Dosim 114(1–3):126–130, 2005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hufton et al: Digital radiography in pediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 71:186–199, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanhede et al: The influence of different technique factors on imagequality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. Br J Radiol 75:38–49, 2002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG: Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227(3):617–622, 2003 Jun

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charles E. Willis: Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S196–S200, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huda W: Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S173–S182, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seibert JA: Tradeoffs between image quality and dose. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S183–S195, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Peter J. Strouse, M.D. (Associate Professor and Director, Section of Pediatric Radiology, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI) for reviewing the manuscript providing valuable suggestions.

This study has been in part supported by the European Coordination Action SENTINEL (FI6R-012909) and by the SADORADI project GR/SAL/0272/2004 of the Autonomous Community of Madrid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Vano-Galvan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanchez Jacob, R., Vano-Galvan, E., Vano, E. et al. Optimising the Use of Computed Radiography in Pediatric Chest Imaging. J Digit Imaging 22, 104–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9071-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9071-2

Key words

Navigation