Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of gray level parameters in order to distinguish healthy bone from osteoblastic metastases on digitized radiographs.
Materials and methods
Skeletal radiographs of healthy bone (n = 144) and osteoblastic metastases (n = 35) were digitized using pixels 0.175 mm in size and 4,096 gray levels. We obtained an optimized healthy bone classification to compare with pathological bone: cortical, trabecular, and flat bone. The osteoblastic metastases (OM) were classified in nonflat and flat bone. These radiological images were analyzed by using a computerized method. The parameters (gray scale) calculated were: mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (MGL, SDGL, and CVGL, respectively) based on gray level histogram analysis. Diagnostic utility was quantified by measurement of parameters on healthy and pathological bone, yielding quantification of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, AUC.
Results
All three image parameters showed high and significant values of AUC when comparing healthy trabecular bone and nonflat bone OM, showing MGL the best discriminatory ability (0.97). As for flat bones, MGL showed no ability to distinguish between healthy and flat bone OM (0.50). This could be achieved by using SDGL or CVGL, with both showing a similar diagnostic ability (0.85 and 0.83, respectively).
Conclusion
Our results show that the use of gray level parameters quantify healthy bone and osteoblastic metastases zones on digitized radiographs. This may be helpful as a complementary method for differential diagnosis. Moreover, our method will allow us to study the evolution of osteoblastic metastases under medical treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D Goltzman (1997) ArticleTitleMechanisms of the development of osteoblastic metastases Cancer 80 1581–1587 Occurrence Handle9362425 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmvFyht70%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1581::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-N
M Tubiana-Hulin (1991) ArticleTitleIncidence, prevalence and distribution of bone metastases Bone 12 IssueIDSuppl 1 s9–s10 Occurrence Handle1954049 Occurrence Handle10.1016/8756-3282(91)90059-R
JJ Yin CB Pollock K Kelly (2005) ArticleTitleMechanisms of cancer metastasis to the bone Cell Res 15 IssueID1 57–62 Occurrence Handle15686629 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkslGisbc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.cr.7290266
A Baltasar Sánchez A González-Sistal (2005) Evaluation of healthy bone by a method based on image analysis A Mendez-Vilas (Eds) Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Applied Physics Elsevier Science Oxford 683–688
González-Sistal A, Baltasar Sánchez A: Assessment of mean gray level parameter. Usefulness on healthy skeletal digitized radiographs. Biomed Tech 50 (supplementary vol. 1, part 2):1396–1397, 2005
IC Sluimer PF Waes Particlevan MA Viergever B Ginneken Particlevan (2003) ArticleTitleComputer-aided diagnosis in high resolution CT of the lungs Med Phys 30 IssueID12 3081–3090 Occurrence Handle14713074 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1624771
H Li ML Giger Z Huo OI Olopade L Lan BL Weber I Bonta (2004) ArticleTitleComputerized analysis of mamographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location Med Phys 31 IssueID3 549–555 Occurrence Handle15070253 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1644514
AR Pineda HH Barret (2004) ArticleTitleFigures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. Flat background and deterministic blurring Med Phys 31 IssueID2 348–358 Occurrence Handle15000621 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1631426
RC González RE Woods (2002) Digital Image Processing Prentice-Hall Massachusetts
CE Metz BA Herman JH Shen (1998) ArticleTitleMaximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data Stat Med 17 1033–1053 Occurrence Handle9612889 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3nsFygtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:9<1033::AID-SIM784>3.0.CO;2-Z
JA Hanley BJ McNeil (1982) ArticleTitleThe meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 29–36 Occurrence Handle7063747 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2C2M7oslc%3D
A Baltasar Sánchez A González-Sistal (2004) ArticleTitleCharacterization of osteoblastic metastases from digitalized radiographs Med Phys 31 IssueID6 1850
A Baltasar Sánchez A González-Sistal (2005) ArticleTitleImprovement of osteoblastic metastases diagnosis from skeletal digitized radiographs Med Phys 32 IssueID6 1916–1917 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.1997537
LD Rybak DI Rosenthal (2001) ArticleTitleRadiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases Q J Nucl Med 45 53–64 Occurrence Handle11456376 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvgsFCntQ%3D%3D
Ries L, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al: SEER Cancer Statistics review, 1973–1999.National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 2002. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the “Fundació Universitària Agustí Pedro i Pons”, “Accions Especials de Suport a la Recerca del Campus de Bellvitge” Universtity of Barcelona and the Spanish Government (MCYT, BFI 2001-3331).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Sistal, A., Baltasar Sánchez, A. A Complementary Method for the Detection of Osteoblastic Metastases on Digitized Radiographs. J Digit Imaging 19, 270–275 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-9946-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-9946-7