Skip to main content

Trumps Wirtschaftspolitik und der Corona-Schock - Perspektiven für die USA

Trumps Economic Policy and the Corona Shock - Perspectives for the USA

Zusammenfassung

US-Präsident Donald Trump hat am 3. November 2020 zwar eine Niederlage erfahren, dennoch könnte der seit 2016 politisch in den USA herrschende Populismus als Mischung aus neuem Nationalismus und Protektionismus für einige Jahre andauern. Die US-Wahlen fanden unter besonderen Bedingungen statt: so löste der Corona-Schock einen weltweiten Wirtschaftsschock aus.

Abstract

The United States is characterised by a structural populism problem that persists even without Trump as president. Its economic policy is fundamentally contradictory. The US fiscal and deficit policy under Trump was considered risky even before the corona shock, while the aggressive US trade policy is a self-inflicted wound. If we look at effective lifetime income, Germany, France and the United States are on an equal footing. This is due in part to the lag in life expectancy in the US and the much higher health care costs - relative to GDP - in the American system. A transatlantic dialogue on reform would be worthwhile after the corona shock of 2020.

Literatur

  • Aghion, P. und P. Howitt (2007), Capital, innovation, and growth accounting, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvaredo, F., L. Chancel, T. Piketty, E. Saez und G. Zucman (2018), World Inequality Report 2018, World Inequality Report, https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/sites/default/files/publication/document/2018/7/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf (27. Oktober 2020).

  • Breemersch, K., J. Damijan und J. Konings (2017), Labour Market Polarization in Advanced Countries: Impact of Global Value Chains, Technology, Import Competition from China and Labour Market Institutions, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, Nr. 197, OECD Publishing.

  • Bretschger, L., E. Grieg, P. J. Welfens und T. Xiong (2020), COVID-19 Infections and Fatalities Developments: Empirical Evidence for OECD Countries and Newly Industrialized Economies, EIIW Discussion Paper, Nr. 277, EIIW/University of Wuppertal, https://uni-w.de/d9lil (25. September 2020).

  • CBO (2020), The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2020 to 2030, Congressional Budget Office, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56073 (25. September 2020).

  • De Bolle, M. und J. Zettelmeyer (2019), Measuring the Rise of Economic Nationalism, Petersen Institute for International Economics Working Paper, 19-15, Washington DC, https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/wp19-15.pdf (25. September 2020).

  • Eichengreen, B. (2018), The Populist Temptation - Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era, Oxford University Press.

  • Fourage, D., T. Schils und A. De Grip (2013), Why Do Low-Educated Workers Invest Less in Further Training?, Applied Economics, 45(18), 2587–2601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. (2006), Twin Deficits and Twin Decades, in R. Kopcke, G. Tootell und R. Triest (Hrsg.), The Macroeconomics of Fiscal Policy, MIT Press.

  • IWF (2019), Article IV Consultation, United States, IMF Country Report, 19/17, Juni.

  • IWF (2020a), IMF Fiscal Monitor April 2020, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2020/04/06/fiscal-monitor-april-2020 (25. September 2020).

  • IWF (2020b), Article IV Consultation, United States, IMF Country Report, Nr. 20/241, August.

  • IWF (2020c), World Economic Outlook Update, Juni.

  • Jaumotte, F., S. Lall und C. Papageorgiou (2008), Rising income inequality: Technology, or trade and financial globalization, IMF Working Paper, WP/08/185.

  • Lindh, A. und L. McCall (2018), Reconsidering the Popular Policy of Redistribution: Preferences for Reducing Economic Inequality in the US. Paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on “New research on Inequality and its Impacts” at United Nations Headquarters in New York, 12.-13. September.

  • OECD (2020), Main Economic Indicators - complete database, monatliche Daten von 1. Januar 1995 bis 1. Juni 2020, https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00052-en (17. August 2020).

  • PEW Research Center (2020), A majority of young adults in the U.S. live with their parents for the first time since the Great Depression, Pew Research Center, September.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2018), A Rigged Economy, Scientific American, 319(5), 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welfens, P. J. J. (2018), Brexit aus Versehen: Europäische Union zwischen Desintegration und neuer EU, 2. Aufl., Springer.

  • Welfens, P. J. J. (2019a), The Global Trump: Structural US Populism and Economic Conflicts with Europe and Asia, Palgrave.

  • Welfens, P. J. J. (2019b), Klimaschutzpolitik - Das Ende der Komfortzone, Springer.

  • Welfens, P. J. J. (2020a), Trump global, Springer.

  • Welfens, P. J. J. (2020b), Corona-Weltrezession, Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. J. Welfens.

Additional information

Prof. Dr. Paul J. J. Welfens ist Präsident des Europäischen Instituts für Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen (EIIW) an der Bergischen Universität Wuppertal und Jean Monnet Professor für European Economic Integration, Chair for Macroeconomics. Er war Alfred Grosser Professor am Sciences Po, Paris und ist Non-resident Senior Research Fellow am AICGS/Johns Hopkins University, Washington DC und zudem Research Fellow am IZA, Bonn.

Rights and permissions

Open Access: Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de) veröffentlicht.

Open Access wird durch die ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft gefördert.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welfens, P.J.J. Trumps Wirtschaftspolitik und der Corona-Schock - Perspektiven für die USA. Wirtschaftsdienst 100, 848–855 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2786-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2786-0

JEL Classification

  • E61
  • F00
  • I18