Abstract
Social science, like all other sciences, is supposed to explore the substance below the surface of things. However, populism discourse in general is stuck on the surface, focusing on style, outlook and appearance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by ZBW — Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
László Andor, Foundation for European Progressive Studies, Brussels, Belgium.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Andor, L. Against a General Theory of Populism: The Case of East-Central Europe. Intereconomics 55, 21–26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0864-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0864-6