Skip to main content
Log in

Brexit as an Inelastic Good: A Microeconomic Theory of Direct Democracy

  • Forum
  • Published:
Intereconomics

Abstract

On 23 June 2016 a slight majority of 52% of UK voters opted to leave the European Union after 44 years of membership. Many were surprised by the result. Why did a majority vote Leave? Why were the majority of the voters not susceptible to the economic arguments advanced by major economic institutions such as the Bank of England, OECD, IMF, HM Treasury and virtually all major investment banks? Why did (now former) Prime Minister David Cameron, who campaigned for Remain, lose the vote only a year after his party had won a surprise victory in the 2015 general election?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Qvortrup.

Additional information

Matt Qvortrup, Coventry University, UK.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qvortrup, M. Brexit as an Inelastic Good: A Microeconomic Theory of Direct Democracy. Intereconomics 51, 260–264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-016-0615-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-016-0615-x

Navigation