Skip to main content
Log in

Discretion and accountability: An economic analysis of the ESMA judgment and the Meroni doctrine

  • Accountability
  • Published:
Intereconomics

Abstract

This paper assesses the effectiveness of the Meroni doctrine in the light of the recent judgment in the ESMA case. The fi rst part explains in detail the problem of delegation of powers in the EU from the perspective of the principal-agent theory and complements it with the analysis of the trade-off between different levels of independence and accountability of agencies. A simple economic model is developed to illustrate the relationship between the independence and accountability of an agency. It shows that it is the accountability mechanism that induces the agent to act, rather than the extent of his independence. The paper also explains the intertemporal interactions between the principal and the agent on the basis of the incentives in place for the different players.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phedon Nicolaides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nicolaides, P., Preziosi, N. Discretion and accountability: An economic analysis of the ESMA judgment and the Meroni doctrine. Intereconomics 49, 279–287 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-014-0510-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-014-0510-2

Keywords

Navigation