Abstract
This paper highlights that the EMU transition process itself can pose challenges to individual accession countries and draws policy implications for ERM II. Differences in financial market development and international liabilities underscore the risks and benefits of ERM II, and may lead to conflict between short and long-term policy objectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimakova, A. Financial markets and exchange-rate regimes in transition to EMU. Intereconomics 44, 142–148 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-009-0288-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-009-0288-9