Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative analysis of dimensional alterations following extraction of maxillary molars using three-dimensional images’ superimposition: a CBCT study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the bone alterations following maxillary molar extraction and (ii) identify the factors associated with bone alterations using a tomographic analysis. Cone Beam Computer Tomographies (CBCTs) of 17 subjects with 25 maxillary molars were analyzed, before and, in average, 12 months following extraction. Fifty CBCTs were segmented as 3D models that were used as reference for analysis. Cross-sectional planes were established to measure the dimensional changes in the vertical, horizontal aspects, and the area of the alveolar bone. Associations between root divergence, initial bone location related to the maxillary sinus, and the thickness of buccal and palatal bone at baseline was assessed using mixed-effect models. Overall, the average reduction in vertical bone height was 35.23% (2.61 ± 1.76 mm). The mean reduction of area of alveolar process and horizontal bone width were 18.89% (56.08 ± 44.23 mm2) and 65.10% (8.33 ± 4.51 mm), respectively. There was a marginal significant association between horizontal bone changes and the thickness of palatal bone (p = 0.05). The results of the present study indicated that following maxillary molar extraction, significant dimensional changes occur in both the vertical and horizontal directions. The vertical changes were mainly attributed to remodeling on the coronal aspect of the alveolar ridge and sinus pneumatization was rare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology. 2017;73(1):73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Misawa M, Lindhe J, Araujo MG. The alveolar process following single-tooth extraction: a study of maxillary incisor and premolar sites in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(7):884–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(12):1048–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, Buser D. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):195S-201S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513506713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(5):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SFM, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. J Dent Res. 2018;97(3):266–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517737755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Araujo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonca AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):407–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nunes LS, Bornstein MM, Sendi P, Buser D. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(3):337–45. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasperini G, Canullo L, Dellavia C, Pellegrini G, Simion M. Socket grafting in the posterior maxilla reduces the need for sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010a;30(3):265–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasperini G, Canullo L, Dellavia C, Pellegrini G, Simion M. Socket grafting in the posterior maxilla reduces the need for sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010b;30(3):265–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Killip S. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(3):204–8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavalcanti MC, Guirado TE, Sapata VM, Costa C, Pannuti CM, Jung RE, et al. Maxillary sinus floor pneumatization and alveolar ridge resorption after tooth loss: a cross-sectional study. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e64. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2018.vol32.0064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Acharya A, Hao J, Mattheos N, Chau A, Shirke P, Lang NP. Residual ridge dimensions at edentulous maxillary first molar sites and periodontal bone loss among two ethnic cohorts seeking tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(12):1386–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pramstraller M, Farina R, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L. Ridge dimensions of the edentulous posterior maxilla: a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 127 patients using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01984.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chappuis V, Engel O, Shahim K, Reyes M, Katsaros C, Buser D. Soft tissue alterations in esthetic postextraction sites. J Dent Res. 2015;94(9):187S-S193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515592869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, Avila-Ortiz G, Barter S, Brodala N, Chappuis V, Chen B, De Souza A, Almeida RF, Fickl S, Finelle G, Ganeles J, Gholami H, Hammerle C, Jensen S, Jokstad A, Katsuyama H, Kleinheinz J, Kunavisarut C, Mardas N, Monje A, Papaspyridakos P, Payer M, Schiegnitz E, Smeets R, Stefanini M, Ten Bruggenkate C, Vazouras K, Weber HP, Weingart D, Windisch P. Group 1 ITI consensus report: the influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharan A. maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tolstunov L, Thai D, Arellano L. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38(4):377–90. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saccucci M, Cipriani F, Carderi S, Di Carlo G, D’Attilio M, Rodolfino D, et al. Gender assessment through three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinuses by means of cone beam computed tomography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(2):185–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levi I, Halperin-Sternfeld M, Horwitz J, Zigdon-Giladi H, Machtei EE. Dimensional changes of the maxillary sinus following tooth extraction in the posterior maxilla with and without socket preservation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(5):952–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D, Rostetter C, Rucker M, Stadlinger B. 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0128-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Schriber M, Bornstein MM, Suter VGA. Is the pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus following tooth loss a reality? A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography and a customised software program. Clin Oral Investig. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2552-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27(2):120–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J, Tee BC, Kim DG, Leblebicioglu B, England G. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(3):353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA Jr. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:734–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Prosthodontics of Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Barbisan de Souza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YW., Finkelman, M., Papaspirisdakos, P. et al. Comparative analysis of dimensional alterations following extraction of maxillary molars using three-dimensional images’ superimposition: a CBCT study. Odontology 109, 514–523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00568-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00568-y

Keywords

Navigation