Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting the outcome of initial non-surgical endodontic procedures by periapical status and quality of root canal filling: a cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the previous periapical status and the quality of root canal filling as predictors of the outcome in initial non-surgical endodontic procedures. A retrospective cohort study was designed in which the presence of a previous periapical lesion was determined radiographically. The quality of the root filling was evaluated in terms of homogeneity, taper, and apical extension. The response variable was dichotomized to success and failure. Bivariate analyzes and a mixed generalized linear model interpreted the association between the explanatory variables and the outcome of the initial non-surgical endodontic procedures. A total of 349 roots were evaluated, and a failure rate of 13.18% was established. Poor filling quality was determined in 8.3% of the roots. As a main result, the presence of a preoperative periapical lesion did not determine a significant risk to the failure of the initial treatment. Unlike, a poor quality of the obturation determined association with an unfavorable outcome like this: (1) homogeneity (OR 2.32; p = 0.0181); (2) taper (OR 5.8; p = 0.0); and, (3) extension (OR 3.41; p = 0.0). Therefore, a significant association between inadequate quality of the root filling and failure of the primary non-surgical endodontic procedures was found. Short length of filling was highly associated with failure. The presence of previous periapical lesion was not found to be a significant predictor for treatment outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ADA Survey Center. 2005–2006 Survey of dental services rendered. Dental practice. Chicago: American dental association. 2007. p. 70.

  2. MinSalud. IV Estudio nacional de salud bucal. ENSAV IV. Colombia. 2014. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENSAB-IV-Situacion-Bucal-Actual.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2017.

  3. Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford TR. Apical periodontitis. Microbial infection and host responses. In: Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford TR, eds. Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1998.

  4. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011;44:583–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhong Y, Chasen J, Yamanaka R, et al. Extension and density of root fillings and post-operative apical radiolucencies in the veterans affairs dental longitudinal study. J Endod. 2008;34:798–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santos S, Soares A, Costa G, Brito-Júnior M, Moreira A, Magalhães C. Radiographic parameters of quality of root canal fillings and periapical status: a retrospective cohort study. J Endod. 2010;36:1932–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marquis V, Dao T, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study Phase iii: initial treatment. J Endod. 2006;32:299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Azim A, Griggs J, Huang G. The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49:6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee A, Cheung G, Wong M. Long-term outcome of primary non-surgical root canal treatment. Clin Oral Invest. 2012;16:1607–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hülsmann M. Epidemiology of post-treatment disease. Endod Topics. 2016;34:42–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez R, Cadavid D, Zapata S, Alvarez L, Restrepo F. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod. 2013;39:1097–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno J, Alves F, Gonçalves L, Martínez A, Roças I, Siqueira, Jr. Periradicular status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations in an urban colombian population. J Endod. 2013;39:600–4.

  13. Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson J. Spangberg L A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:825–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsesis I, Goldberger T, Taschieri S, Seifan M, Tamse A, Rosen E. The dynamics of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth that are left without intervention: a longitudinal study. J Endod. 2013;39:1510–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussein FE, Liew AK, Ramlee RA, Abdullah D, Chong BS. Factors associated with apical periodontitis: a multilevel analysis. J Endod. 2016;42:1441–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robia G. Comparative radiographic assessment of root canal obturation quality: manual versus rotary canal preparation technique. Int J Biomed. 2014;10:136–42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weber F, Paza AF, Machado D, Pasternak B, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Andrada AC, Roberti LF, Dutra-Horstmann KL. The influence of apical extent of root canal obturation on endodontic therapy outcome: a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23:2005–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Lit Rev Int Endod J. 1998;31:384–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Felix de Sousa MR, Oliveira R, Guimarães G, Prado EK, Tarnoschi R, Dezan-Júnior E, Tavares L. Evaluation of the relationship between obturation length and presence of apical periodontitis by CBCT: an observational cross sectional study. Clin Oral Invest. 2019;23:2055–60.

  20. Song M. Periapical status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings in a korean population. J Endod. 2014;40:182–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Michael H, Ove P, Paul D. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10:30–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedman S. Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endod Topics. 2002;2:59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbott PV. Recognition and prevention of failures in clinical dentistry endodontics. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 1991;11:150–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Halse A, Molven O. A Strategy for the Diagnosis of Periapical Pathosis. J Endod. 1986;12:534–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortés-Reyes É, Rubio-Romero JA, Gaitán-Duarte H. Métodos estadísticos de evaluación de la concordancia y la reproducibilidad de pruebas diagnósticas. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2010;61:247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM. Generalized, Linear, and mixed models. 2nd ed. E.E.U.U: Wiley; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. 2016. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 16 Jan 2017

  30. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Myunghee CP. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley; 2004.

  31. Friedman S, Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy –healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004;32:493–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Craveiro M, Fontana C, de Martin A, Bueno C. Influence of coronal restoration and root canal filling quality on periapical status: clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Endod. 2015;41:836–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Costa G, Santos S, Pelli P, Verli F, Gonçalves P, Pereira S, De Jesus TR, Soares J, Matos M. Factors affecting the periapical status of root-filled canals: a cross-sectional study at the undergraduate level. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. García-Guerrero C, Parra-Junco C, Quijano-Guauque S, Molano N, Pineda G, Marín-Zuluaga DJ. Vertical root fractures in endodontically-treated teeth: a retrospective analysis of possible risk factors. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The English version of this manuscript was possible thanks to Professor Jaime Castro-Núñez, oral and maxillofacial surgeon and oral pathologist of Muncie, IN., and Kathryn Pope at Antioch University at Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad Nacional de Colombia through Convocatoria Nacional de Proyectos Para El Fortalecimiento De La Investigación, Creación e Innovación 2016–2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia García-Guerrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (Universidad Nacional de Colombia Code # CIE-096-16) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Guerrero, C., Delgado-Rodríguez, C.E., Molano-González, N. et al. Predicting the outcome of initial non-surgical endodontic procedures by periapical status and quality of root canal filling: a cohort study. Odontology 108, 697–703 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00494-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00494-z

Keywords

Navigation