Skip to main content
Log in

Selected physicochemical properties of AH Plus, EndoREZ and RealSeal SE root canal sealers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this laboratory study was to assess selected physicochemical properties of three root canal sealers. The solubility, setting time and radiopacity of AH Plus, EndoREZ and RealSeal SE were evaluated. The solubility was determined by weight loss of specimens in water over a period of 28 days. Setting time and radiopacity were assessed according to ANSI/ADA and ISO specifications using an aluminum step wedge calibrated in millimeters and the intendention test using a Gilmore needle. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Student–Newman–Keuls test for pairwise comparisons. AH Plus was significantly less soluble, showed the significantly highest radiopacity and displayed the significantly longest setting time of all sealers (P < 0.01). At all exposure times, EndoREZ was significantly more soluble than the other sealers (P < 0.01) and displayed the significantly lowest values regarding radiopacity (P < 0.01). Analysis showed that setting time and radiopacity for all sealers met the ANSI/ADA and ISO standards. Solubility of AH Plus and RealSeal confirmed the ANSI/ADA and ISO specification, while EndoREZ clearly exceeded the proposed solubility value. Out of all sealers tested, AH Plus obtained the best values for all properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitworth J. Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices. Endod Top. 2005;12:2–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or tangible goal. J Endod. 2007;33:391–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gesi A, Raffaelli O, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod. 2005;31:809–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Darrag AM, Fayyad DM. Adhesives in endodontics. part II: role of adhesion in root canal obturation. ENDO (Lond Engl). 2011;5:87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hiraishi N, Loushine RJ, Vano M, Chieffi N, Weller RN, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Is an oxygen inhibited layer required for bonding of resin-coated gutta-percha to methacrylate-based root canal sealer? J Endod. 2006;32:429–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Souza SF, Bombana AC, Franncci C, Gonçalves F, Castellan C, Braga RR. Polymerization stress, flow and dentine bond strength of two resin-based root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2009;42:867–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mokeem-Saleh A, Hammad M, Silikas N, Qualtrough A, Watts DC. A laboratory evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of selected root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2010;43:882–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YK, Mai S, Haycock JR, Kim SK, Loushine RJ, Pashley DH, Tay FR. The self-etching potential of RealSeal versus RealSeal SE. J Endod. 2009;35:1264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA). Specification No. 57: endodontic sealing materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Organization for Standardization. International Standard ISO 6876:2001: Dental root canal sealing materials. Genf: International Organization for Standardization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, Pongione G, Gerosa R, Gagliani M. Radiographic and rheological properties of a new endodontic sealer. Aust Endod J. 2006;32:31–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carvalho-Junior JR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Correr AB, Sinhoreti MAC, Consani S, Sousa-Neto MD. Radiopacity of root filling materials using digital radiography. Int Endod J. 2007;40:514–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schäfer E, Zandbiglari T. Solubility of root canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J. 2003;36:660–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva EJ, Santos CC, Zaia AA. Long-term cytotoxic effects of contemporary root canal sealers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:43–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scelza MZ, Linhares AB, da Silva LE, Granjeiro JM, Alves GG. A multiparametric assay to compare the cytotoxicity of endodontic sealers with primary human osteoblasts. Int Endod J. 2012;45:12–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donnelly A, Sword J, Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Agee K, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water sorption and solubility of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2007;33:990–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee BS, Wang CY, Fang YY, Hsieh KH, Lin CP. A novel urethane acrylate-based root canal sealer with improved degree of conversion, cytotoxicity, bond strengths, solubility, and dimensional stability. J Endod. 2011;37:246–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marin-Bauza GA, Rached-Junior FJA, Souza-Gabriel AE, Souza-Neto MD, Miranda CES, Silva-Sousa YTC. Physicochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 2010;36:1531–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Versiani MA, Carvalho-Junior JR, Padilha MIAF, Lacey S, Pascon EA, Sousa-Neto MD. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus™ and Epiphany™ root canal sealants. Int Endod J. 2006;39:464–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Resende LM, Rached-Junior FJA, Versiani MA, Souza-Gabriel AE, Miranda CES, Silva-Sousa YTC, Sousa Neto MD. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2009;42:785–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McMichen FRS, Pearson G, Rahbaran S, Gulabivala K. A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers. Int Endod J. 2003;36:629–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Danesh G, Hellak T, Reinhardt KJ, Végh A, Schäfer E, Lippold C. Elution characteristics of residual monomers in different light- and auto-curing resins. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2012;64:867–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson AD. Specification test for the solubility and disintegration of dental cements: a critical evaluation of its meaning. J Dent Res. 1976;55:721–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanomaru-Filho M, Jorge EG, Tanomaru JMG, Gonçalves M. Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images. J Endod. 2007;33:249–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeferino EG, Cunha RS, Bellato TS, Filho JEG, De Martin AS, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparative study of the radiopacity of endodontic sealers with different chemical compositions. ENDO (Lond Engl). 2011;5:209–13.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grossman LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod. 1976;2:166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar Schäfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schäfer, E., Bering, N. & Bürklein, S. Selected physicochemical properties of AH Plus, EndoREZ and RealSeal SE root canal sealers. Odontology 103, 61–65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0137-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0137-y

Keywords

Navigation