Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to establish normative data for mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions in Mongolian adults and to compare them with those of Japanese adults. The study materials comprised dental casts of 100 modern Mongolian and 100 Japanese subjects (50 males, 50 females for each) with Angle Class I normal occlusion. The mean ages were 20 years 8 months for the Mongolian subjects and 20 years 0 months for the Japanese subjects. On the dental casts, the mesiodistal tooth crown diameters (excluding wisdom teeth) and dental arch dimensions were measured. The following arch dimensions were measured: inter-canine lingual, inter-premolar lingual, inter-molar lingual, inter-molar central, coronal arch length, basal arch length, and basal arch width. In the Mongolian samples, significant sex differences were noted, and most of the items were significantly larger in males than in females. Significant differences between the Mongolian and Japanese samples were mainly noted in the premolar and molar regions, rather than in the anterior region, and were significantly smaller in the Mongolian samples. In the Mongolian samples, the molar section widths and basal arch width and length were significantly larger in males and females compared with the Japanese samples. These results suggest that the tooth crown size and arch dimensions in the Mongolian samples differed from those in the Japanese samples, and that establishment of the clinical norm for Mongolian adults might be helpful in formulating treatment plans for Mongolian patients, given that these parameters are the basic tools for diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

I1:

Central incisor

I2:

Lateral incisor

C:

Canine

P1:

First premolar

P2:

Second premolar

M1:

First molar

M2:

Second molar

References

  1. Chimge N, Batsuuri J. Interethnic genetic differentiation, HLA Class I antigens in the population of Mongolia. Am J Hum Biol. 1999;11:603–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition. J Anthropol Soc Nippon. 1966;74:61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the permanent dentition. In: VIIIth Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. 1968; Tokyo and Kyoto, 298-300.

  4. Turner II CG. Late Pleistocene and Holocene population history of east Asia based on dental variation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987;73:305–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hillson S. Dental anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 1996. p. 101–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scott RG, TurnerII CG. The anthropology of modern human teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 1997. p. 270–1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iscan MY. The emergence of dental anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989;78:1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moorrees CFA, Thomsen SØ, Jensen E, Yen PKJ. Mesiodistal crown diameters of the deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals. J Dent Res. 1957;36:39–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumura H. Dental characteristics affinities of the prehistoric to the modern Japanese with the East Asians, American Natives and Australo-Melanesians. Anthropol Sci. 1995;103:235–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanihara T, Ishida H. Metric dental variation of major human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128:287–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Little RM. The Irregularity Index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:554–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howes AE. A polygon portrayal of coronal and basal arch dimensions in the horizontal plane. Am J Orthod. 1954;40:811–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kayukawa H. Studies on morphology of mandibular overjet. Jpn J Orthod. 1956;15:6–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch width of southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:54–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija SJ. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordan sample. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:459–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arya BS, Sayara BS, Thomas D, et al. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:479–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvaran N, Roldan SI, Buschang PH. Maxillary and mandibular arch width of Colombians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:649–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM, Hassan R, Anderson PJ, Townsend GC. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:243–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sofaer JA, Bailit HL, MacLean CJ. A developmental basis for differential tooth reduction during hominid evolution. Evolution. 1971;25:509–17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dahlberg AA. The changing dentition of the man. J Amer Dent Assoc. 1945;32:676–90.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tsuchimochi T, Arai K. Comparison of clinical dental arch form between Japanese and Mongolian subjects with normal occlusion. Orthod Waves Jpn ed. 2012; 69, (in press).

  23. Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:53–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reid DJ, Dean MC. Variation in modern human enamel formation times. J Hum Evol. 2006;50:329–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Townsend GC, Harris EF, Lesot H, Clauss F, Brook A. Morphogenetic fields within the human dentition: a new clinically relevant synthesis of an old concept. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54:S34–44.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentfacial Orthop. 1997;111:401–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harris E. A longitudinal study of arch size and form in untreated adults. Am J Orthod Dentfacial Orthop. 1997;111:419–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The support of the research staff at both the Health Sciences University of Mongolia and The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry Tokyo and Niigata is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuh Hasegawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasegawa, Y., Amarsaikhan, B., Chinvipas, N. et al. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese. Odontology 102, 167–175 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0130-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-013-0130-5

Keywords

Navigation