Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Root and canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars by a modified root canal staining technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second premolars in Indians by a modified canal staining and tooth clearing technique. Maxillary first (350) and second (350) premolars were collected, and the morphology and number of roots analyzed. After cleaning, the teeth were immersed in India ink and placed in a hyperbaric oxygen chamber at 0.6 MPa for 2 h. The teeth were then demineralized and cleared. Digital images of the teeth were examined under magnification to evaluate the number of root canals, root canal system configurations, number of apical foramina, and intercanal communications. Root canal configurations were identified based on Vertucci’s classification and Gulabivala’s additional classes. The most common root morphology of the first premolars was the classical two separate root morphology (a Caucasian trait) and that of the second premolars was a single-root morphology (a Mongoloid trait), though other morphologies such as singlerooted first premolars and three-rooted first and second premolars were also identified. A “radiculous” first premolar was identified in two samples. The buccal roots of the first premolar showed the maximum variation, the most common being type I (Vertucci’s classification), followed by type IV. The highest incidence of intercanal communications was found in the single-rooted first premolars. All roots exhibiting type IV and V canal configurations showed two separate apical foramina, while additional type 2–3 canal configurations showed three separate apical foramina. The root number and morphology as well as the canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars showed both Mongolian and Caucasian traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sperber GH. The phylogeny and odontogeny of dental morphology. In: Sperber GH, editor. From apes to angels. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990. p. 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:359–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:47–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002;35:478–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod 2008;34:956–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:101–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pattanshetti N, Gaidhane M, Al Kandari AM. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population — a clinical study. Int Endod J 2008;41:755–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fan W, Fan B, Gutmann JL, Fan M. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars. Part III. Anatomic features revealed by digital subtraction radiography. J Endod 2008;34:1187–1190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009;42:447–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Oliveira SH, de Moraes LC, Faig-Leite H, Camargo SE, Camargo CH. In vitro incidence of root canal bifurcation in mandibular incisors by radiovisiography. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:234–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scarfe WC, Fana CR, Farman AG. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: use of radiovisiography and hypaque. J Endod 1995;21:185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1555–1561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sberna MT, Rizzo G, Zacchi E, Capparè P, Rubinacci A. A preliminary study of the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography for investigating root canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2009;42:66–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weng XL, Yu SB, Zhao SL, Wang HG, Mu T, Tang RY, Zhou XD. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining technique. J Endod 2009:35:651–656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod 1980;6:421–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Burmese maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2001;34:620–630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Velmurugan N, Sandhya R. Root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in an Indian population: a laboratory study. Int Endod J 2009;42:54–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reich D, Thangaraj K, Patterson N, Price AL, Singh L. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 2009;24:489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vertucci FJ, Gegauff A. Root canal morphology of the maxillary first premolar. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:194–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loh HS. Root morphology of the maxillary first premolar in Singaporeans. Aust Dent J 1998;43:339–402.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carns EJ, Skidmore AE. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:880–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pécora JD, Sousa Neto MD, Saquy PC, Woelfel JB. In vitro study of root canal anatomy of maxillary second premolars. Braz Dent J 1992;3:81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaparro AJ, Segura JJ, Guerrero E, Jiménez-Rubio A, Murillo C, Feito JJ. Number of roots and canals in maxillary first premolars: study of an Andalusian population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:65–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soares JA, Leonardo RT. Root canal treatment of three-rooted maxillary first and second premolars — a case report. Int Endod J 2003;36:705–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Velmurugan N, Parameswaran A, Kandaswamy D, Smitha A, Vijayalakshmi D, Sowmya N. Maxillary second premolar with three roots and three separate root canals — case reports. Aust Endod J 2005;31:73–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Atieh MA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Saudi population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:46–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasanna Neelakantan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neelakantan, P., Subbarao, C., Ahuja, R. et al. Root and canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars by a modified root canal staining technique. Odontology 99, 18–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-010-0137-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-010-0137-0

Key words

Navigation