Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 132, Issue 3, pp 369–381 | Cite as

Leaf structural and hydraulic adjustment with respect to air humidity and canopy position in silver birch (Betula pendula)

  • Arne SellinEmail author
  • Haruhiko Taneda
  • Meeli Alber
Regular Paper
  • 143 Downloads

Abstract

Climate change scenarios predict an increase in air temperature and precipitation in northern temperate regions of Europe by the end of the century. Increasing atmospheric humidity inevitably resulting from more frequent rainfall events reduces water flux through vegetation, influencing plants’ structure and functioning. We investigated the extent to which artificially elevated air humidity affects the anatomical structure of the vascular system and hydraulic conductance of leaves in Betula pendula. A field experiment was carried out at the Free Air Humidity Manipulation (FAHM) site with a mean increase in relative air humidity (RH) by 7% over the ambient level across the growing period. Leaf hydraulic properties were determined with a high-pressure flow meter; changes in leaf anatomical structure were studied by means of conventional light microscopy and digital image processing techniques. Leaf development under elevated RH reduced leaf-blade hydraulic conductance and petiole conductivity and had a weak effect on leaf vascular traits (vessel diameters decreased), but had no significant influence on stomatal traits or tissue proportions in laminae. Both hydraulic traits and relevant anatomical characteristics demonstrated pronounced trends with respect to leaf location in the canopy—they increased from crown base to top. Stomatal traits were positively correlated with several petiole and leaf midrib vascular traits. The reduction in leaf hydraulic conductance in response to increasing air humidity is primarily attributable to reduced vessel size, while higher hydraulic efficiency of upper-crown foliage is associated with vertical trends in the size of vascular bundles, vessel number and vein density. Although we observed co-ordinated adjustment of vascular and hydraulic traits, the reduced leaf hydraulic efficiency could lead to an imbalance between hydraulic supply and transpiration demand under the extreme environmental conditions likely to become more frequent in light of global climate change.

Keywords

Air humidity Leaf hydraulic conductance Stomatal density Vascular bundle Vein density Vessel diameter 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (institutional research project IUT34-9). We thank Jaak Sõber for operating the FAHM humidification system.

Supplementary material

10265_2019_1106_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (760 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 760 kb)

References

  1. Aasamaa K, Sõber A, Rahi M (2001) Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:765–774Google Scholar
  2. Arve LE, Torre S, Olsen JE, Tanino KK (2011) Stomatal responses to drought stress and air humidity. In: Shanker A (ed) Abiotic stress in plants—mechanisms and adaptations. InTech, Rijeka, pp 267–280Google Scholar
  3. Betts AK, Desjardins R, Worth D, Beckage B (2014) Climate coupling between temperature, humidity, precipitation, and cloud cover over the Canadian Prairies. J Geophys Res Atmos 119:13305–13326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ (2010) Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms. New Phytol 188:1113–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blunden J, Arndt DS (2016) State of the climate in 2015. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97:Si–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blunden J, Arndt DS (2017) State of the climate in 2016. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 98:Si–S277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucci SJ, Goldstein G, Scholz FG, Meinzer FC (2016) Physiological significance of hydraulic segmentation, nocturnal transpiration and capacitance in tropical trees: paradigms revisited. In: Goldstein G, Santiago L (eds) Tropical tree physiology. Tree Physiology, vol 6. Springer, Cham, pp 205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucher SF, Auerswald K, Tautenhahn S et al (2016) Inter- and intraspecific variation in stomatal pore area index along elevational gradients and its relation to leaf functional traits. Plant Ecol 217:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlquist S (2001) Comparative wood anatomy. Systematic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Copini P, den Ouden J, Robert EMR et al (2016) Flood-ring formation and root development in response to experimental flooding of young Quercus robur trees. Front Plant Sci 7:775.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Couso LL, Fernández RJ (2012) Phenotypic plasticity as an index of drought tolerance in three Patagonian steppe grasses. Ann Bot 110:849–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer MD, Hawkins H-J, Verboom GA (2009) The importance of nutritional regulation of plant water flux. Oecologia 161:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Souza TC, Magalhães PC, Pereira FJ, de Castro EM, da Silva Junior JM, Parentoni SN (2010) Leaf plasticity in successive selection cycles of ‘Saracura’ maize in response to periodic soil flooding. Pesq Agropec Bras 45:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dessler AE, Davis SM (2010) Trends in tropospheric humidity from reanalysis systems. J Geophys Res 115:D19127.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doffo GN, Monteoliva SE, Rodríguez ME, Luquez VMC (2017) Physiological responses to alternative flooding and drought stress episodes in two willow (Salix spp.) clones. Can J Forest Res 47:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunbar-Co S, Sporck MJ, Sack L (2009) Leaf trait diversification and design in seven rare taxa of the Hawaiian Plantago radiation. Int J Plant Sci 170:61–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EEA (2012) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012. An indicator-based report. EEA Report No. 12/2012. EEA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  19. Eensalu E, Kupper P, Sellin A, Rahi M, Sõber A, Kull O (2008) Do stomata operate at the same relative opening range along a canopy profile of Betula pendula? Funct Plant Biol 35:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fanourakis D, Carvalho SMP, Almeida DPF, Heuvelink E (2011) Avoiding high relative air humidity during critical stages of leaf ontogeny is decisive for stomatal functioning. Physiol Plant 142:274–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fanourakis D, Heuvelink E, Carvalho SMP (2013) A comprehensive analysis of the physiological and anatomical components involved in higher water loss rates after leaf development at high humidity. J Plant Physiol 170:890–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hacke UG, Plavcová L, Almeida-Rodriguez A, King-Jones S, Zhou W, Cooke JEK (2010) Influence of nitrogen fertilization on xylem traits and aquaporin expression in stems of hybrid poplar. Tree Physiol 30:1016–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen R, Mander Ü, Soosaar K et al (2013) Greenhouse gas fluxes in an open air humidity manipulation experiment. Landsc Ecol 28:637–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu J, Yang Q-Y, Huang W, Zhang S-B, Hu H (2014) Effects of temperature on leaf hydraulic architecture of tobacco plants. Planta 240:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson DM, Smith WK (2008) Cloud immersion alters microclimate, photosynthesis and water relations in Rhododendron catawbiense and Abies fraseri seedlings in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Tree Physiol 28:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joshi P, Joshi N, Purohit SD (2006) Stomatal characteristics during micropropagation of Wrightia tomentosa. Biol Plant 50:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuokkanen K, Yan SC, Niemelä P (2003) Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on the leaf chemistry of birch Betula pendula (Roth) and the feeding behaviour of the weevil Phyllobius maculicornis. Agric Forest Entomol 5:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kupper P, Sõber J, Sellin A et al (2011) An experimental facility for Free Air Humidity Manipulation (FAHM) can alter water flux through deciduous tree canopy. Environ Exp Bot 72:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levin M, Lemcoff JH, Cohen S, Kapulnik Y (2007) Low air humidity increases leaf-specific hydraulic conductance of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh (Brassicaceae). J Exp Bot 58:3711–3718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis AM, Boose ER (1995) Estimating volume flow rates through xylem conduits. Am J Bot 82:1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindner M, Fitzgerald JB, Zimmermann NE et al (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manage 146:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meinzer FC (2002) Co-ordination of vapour and liquid phase water transport properties in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy MRC, Jordan GJ, Brodribb TJ (2014) Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata. Plant Cell Environ 37:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nardini A, Pedà G, La Rocca N (2012) Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytol 196:788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niglas A, Alber M, Suur K, Jasińska AK, Kupper P, Sellin A (2015) Does increased air humidity affect stomatal morphology and functioning in hybrid aspen? Botany 93:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Niglas A, Papp K, Sękiewicz M, Sellin A (2017) Short-term effects of light quality on leaf gas exchange and hydraulic properties of silver birch (Betula pendula). Tree Physiol 37:1218–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Niinemets Ü (2001) Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Niinemets Ü, Keenan TF, Hallik L (2015) A worldwide analysis of within-canopy variations in leaf structural, chemical and physiological traits across plant functional types. New Phytol 205:973–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Õunapuu E, Sellin A (2013) Daily dynamics of leaf and soil-to-branch hydraulic conductance in silver birch (Betula pendula) measured in situ. Plant Physiol Biochem 68:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parts K, Tedersoo L, Lõhmus K et al (2013) Increased air humidity and understory composition shape short root traits and the colonizing ectomycorrhizal fungal community in silver birch stands. For Ecol Manage 310:720–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Riikonen J, Holopainen T, Oksanen E, Vapaavuori E (2005) Leaf photosynthetic characteristics of silver birch during three years of exposure to elevated concentrations of CO2 and O3 in the field. Tree Physiol 25:621–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roth-Nebelsick A, Uhl D, Mosbrugger V, Kerp H (2001) Evolution and function of leaf venation architecture: a review. Ann Bot 87:553–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruzin SE (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Sack L, Frole K (2006) Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic capacity in tropical rain forest trees. Ecology 87:483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sack L, Scoffoni C (2013) Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. New Phytol 198:983–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The “hydrology” of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26:1343–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sack L, Melcher PJ, Liu WH, Middleton E, Pardee T (2006) How strong is intracanopy leaf plasticity in temperate deciduous trees? Am J Bot 93:829–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sack L, Dietrich EM, Streeter CM, Sánchez-Gómez D, Holbrook NM (2008) Leaf palmate venation and vascular redundancy confer tolerance of hydraulic disruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1567–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sakurai-Ishikawa J, Murai-Hatano M, Hayashi H et al (2011) Transpiration from shoots triggers diurnal changes in root aquaporin expression. Plant Cell Environ 34:1150–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sellin A, Kupper P (2005) Effects of light availability versus hydraulic constraints on stomatal responses within a crown of silver birch. Oecologia 142:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sellin A, Lubenets K (2010) Variation of transpiration within a canopy of silver birch: effect of canopy position and daily versus nightly water loss. Ecohydrology 3:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sellin A, Eensalu E, Niglas A (2010a) Is distribution of hydraulic constraints within tree crowns reflected in photosynthetic water-use efficiency? An example of Betula pendula. Ecol Res 25:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sellin A, Õunapuu E, Karusion A (2010b) Experimental evidence supporting the concept of light-mediated modulation of stem hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol 30:1528–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sellin A, Tullus A, Niglas A, Õunapuu E, Karusion A, Lõhmus K (2013) Humidity-driven changes in growth rate, photosynthetic capacity, hydraulic properties and other functional traits in silver birch (Betula pendula). Ecol Res 28:523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sellin A, Niglas A, Õunapuu-Pikas E, Kupper P (2014) Rapid and long-term effects of water deficit on gas exchange and hydraulic conductance of silver birch trees grown under varying atmospheric humidity. BMC Plant Biol 14:72.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sellin A, Rosenvald K, Õunapuu-Pikas E, Tullus A, Ostonen I, Lõhmus K (2015) Elevated air humidity affects hydraulic traits and tree size but not biomass allocation in young silver birches (Betula pendula). Front Plant Sci 6:860.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sellin A, Alber M, Keinänen M et al (2017) Growth of northern deciduous trees under increasing atmospheric humidity: possible mechanisms behind the growth retardation. Reg Environ Change 17:2135–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shatil-Cohen A, Attia Z, Moshelion M (2011) Bundle-sheath cell regulation of xylem-mesophyll water transport via aquaporins under drought stress: a target of xylem-borne ABA? Plant J 67:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sperry JS, Nichols KL, Sullivan JEM, Eastlack SE (1994) Xylem embolism in ring-porous, diffuse-porous, and coniferous trees of northern Utah and interior Alaska. Ecology 75:1736–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taneda H, Tateno M (2011) Leaf-lamina conductance contributes to an equal distribution of water delivery in current-year shoots of kudzu-vine shoot, Pueraria lobata. Tree Physiol 31:782–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taneda H, Terashima I (2012) Co-ordinated development of the leaf midrib xylem with the lamina in Nicotiana tabacum. Ann Bot 110:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Taneda H, Kandel DR, Ishida A, Ikeda H (2016) Altitudinal changes in leaf hydraulic conductance across five Rhododendron species in eastern Nepal. Tree Physiol 36:1272–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor G, Tricker PJ, Zhang FZ, Alston VJ, Miglietta F, Kuzminsky E (2003) Spatial and temporal effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE) on leaf growth, cell expansion, and cell production in a closed canopy of poplar. Plant Physiol 131:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trifiló P, Raimondo F, Savi T, Lo Gullo MA, Nardini A (2016) The contribution of vascular and extra-vascular water pathways to drought-induced decline of leaf hydraulic conductance. J Exp Bot 67:5029–5039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trnka M, Olesen JE, Kersebaum KC et al (2011) Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change. Global Change Biol 17:2298–2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xu Z, Zhou G (2008) Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot 59:3317–3325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zwieniecki MA, Melcher PJ, Boyce CK, Sack L, Holbrook NM (2002) Hydraulic architecture of leaf venation in Laurus nobilis L. Plant Cell Environ 25:1445–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations