Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 6, pp 915–924 | Cite as

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus imbalance on photosynthetic traits of poplar Oxford clone under ozone pollution

  • Lu Zhang
  • Yasutomo HoshikaEmail author
  • Elisa Carrari
  • Lorenzo Cotrozzi
  • Elisa Pellegrini
  • Elena Paoletti
JPR Symposium Physiological ecology of woody species in response to air pollution and climate changes


Ozone (O3) pollution and the availability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the soil both affect plant photosynthesis and chlorophyll (Chl) content, but the interaction of O3 and nutrition is unclear. We postulated that the nutritional condition changes plant photosynthetic responses to O3. An O3-sensitive poplar clone (Oxford) was subject to two N levels (N0, 0 kg N ha− 1; N80, 80 kg N ha− 1), two P levels (P0, 0 kg P ha− 1; P80, 80 kg P ha− 1) and three levels of O3 exposure (ambient concentration, AA; 1.5 × AA; 2.0 × AA) over a growing season in an O3 free air controlled exposure (FACE) facility. The daily change of leaf gas exchange and dark respiration (Rd) were investigated at mid-summer (August). Chl a fluorescence was measured three times in July, August and September. At the end of the growing season, Chl content was measured. It was found that Chl content, the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), Chl a fluorescence performance index (PI) and gas exchange were negatively affected by elevated O3. Phosphorus may mitigate the O3-induced reduction of the ratio of photosynthesis to stomatal conductance, while it exacerbated the O3-induced loss of Fv/Fm. Nitrogen alleviated negative effects of O3 on Fv/Fm and PI in July. Ozone-induced loss of net photosynthetic rate was mitigated by N in medium O3 exposure (1.5 × AA). However, such a mitigation effect was not observed in the higher O3 level (2.0 × AA). Nitrogen addition exacerbated O3-induced increase of Rd suggesting an increased respiratory carbon loss in the presence of O3 and N. This may result in a further reduction of the net carbon gain for poplars exposed to O3.


Chlorophyll a fluorescence Nitrogen Ozone Phosphorus Photosynthesis Stomatal conductance 



This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31711530648), University Nursing Program for Young Scholar With Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2017023), the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (2013/7956) and the LIFE15 ENV/IT/000183 project MOTTLES. We would like to thank Alessandro Materassi, Gianni Fasano, Moreno Lazzara, Lorenzo Bussotti, and Isaac Tasap for their support during the field work. We thank Matthew Haworth for the English proofreading.


  1. Appenroth K-J, Stöckel J, Srivastava A, Strasser RJ (2001) Multiple effects of chromate on the photosynthetic apparatus of Spirodela polyrhiza as probed by OJIP Chl fluorescence measurements. Environ Pollut 115:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arevalo CBM, Bhatti JS, Chang SX, Sidders D (2011) Land use change effects on ecosystem carbon balance: from agricultural to hybrid poplar plantation. Agric Ecosys Environ 141:342–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asada K (1999) The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Awad J, Stotz HU, Fekete A, Krischke M, Engert C, Havaux M, Berger S, Mueller MJ (2015) 2-cysteine peroxiredoxins and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase create a water–water cycle that is essential to protect the photosynthetic apparatus under high light stress conditions. Plant Physiol 167:1592–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen HJM (1979) Environmental chemistry of the elements. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun S, Achermann B, De Marco A, Pleijel H, Karlsson PE, Rihm B, Schindler C, Paoletti E (2017) Epidemiological analysis of ozone and nitrogen impacts on vegetation—critical evaluation and recommendations. Sci Tot Environ 603–604:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant JP, Chapin FS III, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bussotti F, Desotgiu R, Cascio C, Pollastrini M, Gravano E, Gerosa G, Marzuoli R, Nali C, Lorenzini G, Salvatori E, Manes F, Schaub M, Strasser RJ (2011) Ozone stress in woody plants assessed with chlorophyll a fluorescence. A critical reassessment of existing data. Environ Exp Bot 73:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christersson L (2010) Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden. Biomass Bioener 34:1289–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper OR, Parrish DD, Ziemke J, Balashov NV, Cupeiro M, Galbally IE, Gilge S, Horowitz L, Jensen NR, Lamarque J-F, Naik V, Oltmans SJ, Schwab J, Shindell DT, Thompson AM, Thouret V, Wang Y, Zbinden RM (2014) Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: anobservation-based review. Elem Sci Anth 2:000029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotrozzi L, Remorini D, Pellegrini E, Guidi L, Nali C, Lorenzini G, Massai R, Landi M (2017) Living in a Mediterranean city in 2050: broadleaf or evergreen “citizens”? Environ Sci Pollut Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crutzen PJ (1970) The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 96:320–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desai S, Nak D, Cumming JR (2014) The influence of phosphorus availability and Laccaria bicolor symbiosis on phosphate acquisition, antioxidant enzyme activity, and rhizospheric carbon flux in Populus tremuloides. Mycorrhiza 24:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farage PK, Long SP (1995) An in vivo analysis of photosynthesis during short-term O3 exposure in three contrasting species. Photosyn Res 43:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng Z, Niu J, Zhang W, Wang X, Yao F, Tian Y (2011) Effects of ozone exposure on sub-tropical evergreen Cinnamomum camphora seedlings grown in different nitrogen loads. Trees 25:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenn ME, Baron JS, Allen EB, Rueth HM, Nydick KR, Geiser L, Bowman WD, Sickman JO, Meixner T, Johnson DW, Neitlich P (2003) Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. Bioscience 53:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrar PJ, Osmond CB (1986) Nitrogen supply as a factor influencing photoinhibition and photosynthetic acclimation after transfer of shade-grown Solanum dulcamara to bright light. Planta 168:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fusaro L, Palma A, Salvatori E, Basile A, Maresca V, Karam EA, Manes F (2017) Functional indicators of response mechanisms to nitrogen deposition, ozone, and their interaction in two Mediterranean tree species. PloS one 12:e0185836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Häikiö E, Freiwald V, Silfver T, Beuker E, Holopainen T, Oksanen E (2007) Impacts of elevated ozone and nitrogen on growth and photosynthesis of European aspen (Populus tremula) and hybrid aspen (P. tremula × Populus tremuloides) clones. Can J For Res 37:2326–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han S-H, Kim D-H, Lee J-C, Kim P-G (2009) Effects of fertilization on physiological parameters in American scamore (Platanus occidentalis) during ozone stress and recovery phase. J Ecol Field Biol 32:149–158Google Scholar
  21. Harmens H, Hayes F, Sharps K, Mills G, Calatayud V (2017) Leaf traits and photosynthetic responses of Betula pendula saplings to a range of ground-level ozone concentrations at a range of nitrogen loads. J Plant Physiol 211:42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoosbeek MR, Lukac M, van Dam D, Godbold DL, Velthorst EJ, Biondi FA, Peressotti A, Cortufo MF, de Angelis P, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2004) More new carbon in the mineral soil of a poplar plantation under free air carbon enrichment (POPFACE): cause of increased priming effect? Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB1040. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoshika Y, Watanabe M, Inada N, Koike T (2013) Model-based analysis of avoidance of ozone stress by stomatal closure in Siebold’s beech (Fagus crenata). Ann Bot 112:1149–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoshika Y, Carrari E, Zhang L, Carriero G, Pignatelli S, Fasano G, Materassi A, Paoletti E (2018) Testing a ratio of photosynthesis to O3 uptake as an index for assessing O3-induced foliar visible injury in poplar trees. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:8113–8124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalaji HM, Schansker G, Ladle RJ, Goltsev V, Bosa K, Allakhverdiev SI, Brestic M, Bussotti F, Calatayud A, Dąbrowski P, Elsheery NI, Ferroni L, Guidi L, Hogewoning SW, Jajoo A, Misra AN, Nebauer SG, Pancaldi S, Penella C, Poli DB, Pollastrini M, Romanowska-Duda ZB, Rutkowska B, Serôdio J, Suresh K, Szulc W, Tambussi E, Yanniccari M, Zivcak M (2014) Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues. Photosyn Res 122:121–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kato MC, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2002) Photoinactivation and recovery of photosystem II in Chenopodium album leaves grown at different levels of irradiance and nitrogen-availability. Funct Plant Biol 29:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitao M, Löw M, Heerdt C, Grams TEE, Häberle K-H, Matyssek R (2009) Effects of chronic elevated ozone exposure on gas exchange responses of adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) as related to the within-canopy light gradient. Environ Pollut 157:537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitao M, Kamatsu M, Yazaki K, Kitaoka S, Tobita H (2015) Growth overcompensation against O3 exposure in two Japanese oak species, Quercus mongolica var. crispula and Quercus serrata, grown under elevated CO2. Environ Pollut 206:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996) The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J Appl Ecol 33:1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koricheva J (2002) The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis is dead; long live the carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis? Oikos 98:537–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larcher W (2003) Physiological plant ecology, 4. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis JD, Strain BR (1996) The role of mycorrhizas in the response of Pinus taeda seedlings to elevated CO2. New Phytol. 133:431–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marschner H (2011) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Marten H, Konrad KR, Dietrich P, Roelfsema RG, Hedrich R (2007) Ca2+ -dependent and -independent abscisic acid activation of plasma membrane anion channels in guard cells of Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Physiol 143:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matyssek R, Sandermann H (2003) Impact of ozone on trees: an ecophysiological perspective. In: Esser K, Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Hellwig F (eds) An ecophysiological perspective. Progress in Botany, vol 64. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 349–404Google Scholar
  36. Matyssek R, Clarke N, Cudlín P, Mikkelsen TN, Tuovinen JP, Wieser G, Paoletti E (2013) Climate change, airpollution and global challenges: understanding and perspectives from forest research. In: Krupa SV (ed) Developments in environmental science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 622Google Scholar
  37. Maurer S, Matyssek R (1997) Nutrition and the ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula). II. Carbon balance, water-use efficiency and nutritional status of the whole plant. Trees 12:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maurer S, Matyssek R, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Landolt W, Einig W (1997) Nutrition and the ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula). I. Responses at the leaf level. Trees 12:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills G, Pleijel H, Malley CS, Sinha B, Cooper O, Schultz M, Neufeld HS, Simpson D, Sharps K, Feng Z, Gerosa G, Harmens H, Kobayashi K, Saxena P, Paoletti E, Sinha V, Xu X (2018) Tropospheric ozone assessment report: present day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation. Elem Sci Anth 6:47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB, Freuder RJ (2002) Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, tropospheric ozone, elevated CO2 and land use history on the carbon dynamics of northern hardwood forests. Glob Chan Biol 8:545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ormrod DP, Adedipe NO, Hofstra G (1973) Ozone effects on growth of radish plants as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and by temperature. Plant Soil 39:437–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paoletti E (2005) Ozone slows stomatal response to light and leaf wounding in a Mediterranean evergreen broadleaf, Arbutus unedo. Environ Pollut 134:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paoletti E, De Marco A, Beddows DCS, Harrison RM, Manning WJ (2014) Ozone levels in European and USA cities are increasing more than at rural sites, while peak values are decreasing. Environ Pollut 192:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paoletti E, Materassi A, Fasano G, Hoshika Y, Carriero G, Silaghi D, Badea O (2017) A new-generation 3D ozone FACE (free air controlled exposure). Sci Total Environ 575:1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pell EJ, Sinn JP, Johansen CJ (1995) Nitrogen supply as a limiting factor determining the sensitivity of Populus tremuloides Michx. to ozone stress. New Phytol 130:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng Y, Chen G, Chen G, Li S, Peng T, Qiu X, Luo J, Yang S, Hu T, Hu H, Xu Z, Liu L, Tang Y, Tu L (2017) Soil biochemical responses to nitrogen addition in a secondary evergreen broad-leaved forest ecosystem. Sci Rep 7:2783. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Janssens IA (2012) The human-induced imbalance between C, N and P in Earth’s life system. Glob Chan Biol 18:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schulze ED (1989) Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest. Science 244:776–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sicard P, De Marco A, Troussier F, Renou C, Vas N, Paoletti E (2013) Decrease in surface ozone concentrations at Mediterranean remote sites and increase in the cities. Atmos Environ 79:705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of soil (carbon, nitrogen phosphorus sulfur, micronutrients). John Wiley and Sons Publishers, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  51. Strasser RJ, Srivastava A. Tsimilli-Michael M (2000) The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre U, Mohanty P (eds) Probing photosynthesis: mechanisms, regulation and adaptation. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 445–483Google Scholar
  52. Strasser RJ, Tsimilli-Michael M, Qiang S, Goltsev V (2010) Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797:1313–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suetsugu N, Takami T, Ebisu Y, Watanabe H, Iiboshi C, Doi M, Shimazaki K (2014) Guard cell chloroplasts are essential for blue light-dependent stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Plos one 9:e108374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sutinen S, Wallin G, Karlsson PE, Skärby L, Selldén G (1998) Cell ultrastructure of needles from saplings of Norway spruce, Picea abies (L) Karst., exposed to ozone and low phosphorus supply in open-top chambers. Chemosphere 36:691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sugai T, Kam D-G, Agathokleous E, Watanabe M, Kita K, Koike T (2018) Growth and photosynthetic response of two larches exposed to O3 mixing ratios ranging from preindustrial to near future. Photosynthetica 56:901–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas RB, Lewis JD, Strain BR (1994) Effects of leaf nutrient status on photosynthetic capacity in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings grown in elevated atmospheric CO2. Tree Physiol 14:947–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tissue DT, Lewis JD (2010) Photosynthetic responses of cottonwood seedlings grown in glacial through atmospheric [CO2] vary with phosphorus supply. Tree Physiol 30:1361–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tjoelker MG, Luxmoore RJ (1991) Soil nitrogen and chronic ozone stress influence physiology, growth and nutrient status of Pinus taeda L. and Liriodendron tulipifera L. seedlings. New Phytol 119:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Utriainen J, Holopainen T (2001) Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous availability and ozone stress on Norway spruce seedlings. Tree Physiol 21:447–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Utriainen J, Holopainen T (2002) Responses of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings to limited phosphorus fertilization and treatment with elevated ozone concentrations. Scand J For Res 17:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Heerden PDR, Tsimilli-Michael M, Krüger GHJ, Strasser RJ (2003) Dark chilling effects on soybean genotypes during vegetable development: parallel studies of CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics O–J–I–P and nitrogen fixation. Physiol Plant 117:476–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Heerden PDR, Strasser RJ, Krüger GHJ (2004) Reduction of dark chilling stress in N2-fixing soybean by nitrate as indicated by chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetics. Physiol Plant 121:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vingarzan R (2004) A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmos Environ 38:3431–3442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warren CR (2011) How does P affect photosynthesis and metabolite profiles of Eucalyptus globulus? Tree Physiol 31:727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watanabe M, Yamaguchi M, Iwasaki M, Matsuo N, Naba J, Tabe C, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, Izuta T (2006) Effects of ozone and/ or nitrogen load on the growth of Larix kaempferi, Pinus densiflora and Cryptomeria japonica seedlings. J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ 41:320–334Google Scholar
  66. Watanabe M, Hoshika Y, Inada N, Koike T (2014a) Canopy carbon budget of siebold’s beech (Fagus crenata) sapling under free air ozone exposure. Environ Pollut 184:682–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watanabe M, Hoshika Y, Koike T (2014b) Photosynthetic responses of monarch birch seedlings to differing timings of free air ozone fumigation. J Plant Res 127:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitfield CP, Davison AW, Ashenden TW (1998) The effects of nutrient limitation on the response of Plantago major to ozone. New Phytol 140:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilkinson S, Davies W (2010) Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant community. Plant Cell Environ 33:510–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wooliver RC, Marion ZH, Peterson CR, Potts BM, Senior JK, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA (2017) Phylogeny is a powerful tool for predicting plant biomass responses to nitrogen enrichment. Ecology 98:2120–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yamaguchi M, Watanabe M, Iwasaki M, Tabe C, Matsumura H, Kohno Y, Izuta T (2007) Growth and photosynthetic responses of Fagus crenata seedlings to O3 under different nitrogen loads. Trees 21:707–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang L, Xu H, Yang JC, Li WD, Jiang GM, Li YG (2010) Photosynthetic characteristics of diploid honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica Thunb.) and its autotetraploid cultivar subjected to elevated ozone exposure. Photosynthetica 46:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang L, Hoshika Y, Carrari E, Badea O, Paoletti E (2018) Ozone risk assessment is affected by nutrient availability: evidence from a simulation experiment under free air controlled exposure (FACE). Environ Pollut 238:812–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lu Zhang
    • 1
  • Yasutomo Hoshika
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elisa Carrari
    • 2
  • Lorenzo Cotrozzi
    • 3
  • Elisa Pellegrini
    • 3
  • Elena Paoletti
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Horticulture and Landscape ArchitectureNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.National Research Council of ItalyFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture, Food and EnvironmentUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations