Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 6, pp 897–905 | Cite as

Effect of forest thinning and wood quality on the short-term wood decomposition rate in a Pinus tabuliformis plantation

  • Weiwei Wang
  • Deborah Page-Dumroese
  • Martin Jurgensen
  • Joanne Tirocke
  • Yong Liu
JPR Symposium Physiological ecology of woody species in response to air pollution and climate changes
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of forest thinning and wood quality on wood decomposition in the mineral soil were investigated in a Chinese pine (Pinus tabuliformis Carriére) plantation in northern China by measuring mass loss and changes in wood properties (carbohydrates, lignin and nitrogen (N) concentrations) in wood stakes of two tree species—loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). Stakes were inserted to a 20 cm soil depth in stands with three thinning levels (low, moderate, and heavy) and an unharvested control and removed after 1 year. There were significant differences in stake mass loss among the treatments. The species effect on the stake mass loss was marginally significant. Wood N content of both species increased during decomposition in all thinning treatments, and was only correlated with aspen mass loss. Wood properties of stakes placed in each stand before insertion (t = 0) were similar, except for pine lignin concentration and aspen lignin: N ratio, but neither had any effect on thinning treatment results. Lignin concentration increased and carbohydrate concentration decreased in both aspen and pine wood stakes during decomposition across all thinning treatments, which suggests that brown-rot fungi are dominant wood-decomposers on our study site. We conclude that thinning has a significant influence on the wood decomposition in the mineral soil of this Chinese pine plantation.

Keywords

Forest thinning Wood decomposition Pinus taeda L. Populus tremuloides Michx. Lignin concentration Nitrogen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Armando McDonald at University of Idaho for providing the methods and assistance for lignin and carbohydrate analysis and to Dr. Ann Abbott at the University of Idaho for the statistical review. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30972353).

References

  1. Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter lhemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3546886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ander P, Eriksson K (1977) Selective degradation of wood components by white-rot fungi. Physiol Plant 41:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balogun AO, McDonald AG (2016) Decomposition kinetic study, spectroscopic and pyrolytic analyses of Isoberlinia doka and Pinus ponderosa. Biomass Convers Biorefin 6:315–324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0185-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B, Steffen KT, McClaugherty C (2007) Litter decomposition rate is dependent on litter Mn concentrations. Biogeochemistry 82:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchette RA (1984) Screening wood decayed by white rot fungi for preferential lignin degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:647–653PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchette RA (1995) Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood. Can J Bot 73:999–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchette RA, Otjen L, Effland MJ, Eslyn WE (1985) Changes in structural and chemical-components of wood delignified by fungi. Wood Sci Technol 19:35–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco JA, Page-Dumroese DS et al (2018) Modelling the management of forest ecosystems: importance of wood decomposition. Nat Resour Model 5:1–23Google Scholar
  9. Campbell J, Alberti G, Martin J, Law BE (2009) Carbon dynamics of a ponderosa pine plantation following a thinning treatment in the northern Sierra Nevada. For Ecol Manage 257:453–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carling SF, Clausen CA, Winandy JE (2002) Relationships between mechanical properties, weight loss, and chemical composition of wood during incipient brow-rot decay. For Prod J 52:34–39Google Scholar
  11. Cassel DK, Wendroth O, Nielsen DR (2000) Assessing spatial variability in an agricultural experiment station field. Agron J 92:706.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924706x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen H, Hicks W (2003) High asymbiotic N2fixation rates in woody roots after six years of decomposition: Controls and implications. Basic Appl Ecol 4:479–486.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen G, Shi C, Cheng S et al (2017) The structure and soil characteristics of a Pinus tabuliformis planted forest after 60 years of natural development in north China. Silva Fenn 51:1.  https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connolly JH, Jellison J (1997) Two-way translocation of cations by the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum. Inter J Biodeterior Biodegrad 39:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Allison SD et al (2009) Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: rotted, burned, or consumed? Glob Chang Biol 15:2431–2449.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01916.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dai J, Mcdonald AG (2014) Production of fermentable sugars and polyhydroxybutyrate from hybrid poplar: response surface model optimization of a hot-water pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 71:275–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devi AS, Yadava PS (2007) Wood and leaf litter decomposition of Dipterocarpus tuverculatus Roxb. in a tropical dciduous forest of Manipur, Northeast India. Curr Sci 93:243–246Google Scholar
  18. Entry JA, Backman CB (1995) Influence of carbon and nitrogen on cellulose and lignin degradation in forests soils. Can J For Res 25:1231–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Entry JA, Donnelly PK, Jr. KC (1991) Influence of ectomycorrhizal mat soils on lignin and cellulose degradation. Biol Fertil Soils 275–278Google Scholar
  20. Finér L, Jurgensen M, Palviainen M et al (2016) Does clear-cut harvesting accelerate initial wood decomposition ? A five-year study with standard wood material. For Ecol Manage 372:10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A (2005) Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1083–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fogel R, Cromack K Jr (1977) Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western Oregon. Can J Bot 55:1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganjegunte GK, Condron LM, Clinton PW et al (2004) Decomposition and nutrient release from radiata pine (Pinus radiata) coarse woody debris. For Ecol Manage 187:197–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00332-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ge X, Zeng L, Xiao W et al (2013) Effect of litter substrate quality and soil nutrients on forest litter decomposition: a review. Acta Ecol Sin 33:102–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grigal DF, Vance ED (2000) Influence of soil organic matter on forest productivity. NZ J For Sci 30:169–205Google Scholar
  26. Handa IT, Aerts R, Berendse F et al (2014) Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature 509:218–221.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13247 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ et al (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 34:59–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(03)34002-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iiyama K, Wallis AFA (1988) An improved acetyl bromide procedure for determining lignin in woods and wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol 22:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janisch JE, Harmon ME, Chen H et al (2005) Decomposition of coarse woody debris originating by clearcutting of an old-growth conifer forest. Ecoscience 12:151–160.  https://doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-12-2-151.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ, Spano SD et al (1984) Nitrogen fixation associated with increased wood decay in douglas-fir residue. For Sci 30:1038–1044Google Scholar
  31. Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ, Wolosiewicz M, Harvey AE (1989) A comparison of dinitrogen fixation rates in wood litter decayed by white-rot and brown-rot fungi. Plant Soil 115:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jurgensen MF, Reed D, Page-Dumroese DS et al (2006) Wood strength loss as a measure of decomposition in northern forest mineral soil. Eur J Soil Biol 42:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2005.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S (2009) Does thinning affect litterfall, litter decomposition, and associated nutrient release in Acacia mangium stands of Kerala in peninsular India? Can J For Res 39:792–801.  https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laiho R, Prescott CE (2004) Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 34:763–777.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClaugherty CA, Pastor J et al (1985) Forest litter decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality. Ecology 66:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meentemeyer V (1978) Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465–472.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1936576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moroni MT, Carter PQ, Ryan DAJ (2009) Harvesting and slash piling affects soil respiration, soil temperature, and soil moisture regimes in Newfoundland Boreal Forests. Can J Soil Sci 89:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Osono T, Ono Y, Takeda H (2003) Fungal ingrowth on forest floor and decomposing needle litter of Chamaecyparis obtusa in relation to resource availability and moisture condition. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1423–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00236-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palviainen M, Laiho R, Mäkinen H, Finér L (2008) Do decomposing Scots pine, Norway spruce, and silver birch stems retain nitrogen? Can J For Res 38:3047–3055.  https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pandey KK, Pitman AJ (2004) Examination of the lignin content in a softwood and a hardwood decayed by a brown-rot fungus with the acetyl bromide method and fourier transform infrared. J Polym Sci 42:2340–2346.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.20071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahman MM, Tsukamoto J, Rahman MM et al (2013) Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems. Chem Ecol 29:540–553.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2013.790380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Remsburg AJ, Turner MG (2006) Amount, position, and age of coarse wood influence litter decomposition in postfire Pinus contorta stands. Can J For Res 36:2112–2123.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Risch AC, Jurgensen MF, Page-Dumroese DS, Schütz M (2013) Initial turnover rates of two standard wood substrates following land-use change in subalpine ecosystems in the Swiss Alps. Can J For Res 43:901–910.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, López-Senespleda E et al (2013) Do thinnings influence biomass and soil carbon stocks in Mediterranean maritime pinewoods? Eur J For Res 132:253–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0672-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchez FG, Scott DA, Ludovici KH (2006) Negligible effects of severe organic matter removal and soil compaction on loblolly pine growth over 10 years. For Ecol Manage 227:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shorohova E, Kapitsa E (2014) Influence of the substrate and ecosystem attributes on the decomposition rates of coarse woody debris in European boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 315:173–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW (2006) Restoration thinning and influence of tree size and leaf area to sapwood area ratio on water relations of Pinus ponderosa. Tree Physiol 26:493–503.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.4.493 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW (2007) The influence of thinning on components of stand water balance in a ponderosa pine forest stand during and after extreme drought. Agric For Meteorol 143:266–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spano SD, Jurgensen MF, Larsen MJ, Harvey AE (1982) Nitrogen-fixing bateria in Douglas-fir residue decayed by Fomitopsis pinicola. Plant Soil 68:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strukelj M, Brais S, Quideau SA et al (2013) Chemical transformations in downed logs and snags of mixed boreal species during decomposition. Can J For Res 43:785–798.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Talbot JM, Yelle DJ, Nowick J, Treseder KK (2012) Litter decay rates are determined by lignin chemistry. Biogeochemistry 108:279–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9599-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thibodeau L, Raymond P, Camiré C, Munson AD (2000) Impact of precommercial thinning in balsam fir stands on soil nitrogen dynamics, microbial biomass, decomposition, and foliar nutrition. Can J For Res 30:229–238.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tian D, Peng Y, Yan W et al (2010) Effects of thinning and litter fall removal on fine root production and soil organic carbon content in masson pine plantations. Pedosphere 20:486–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60038-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Titus BD, Prescott CE, Maynard DG et al (2006) Post-harvest nitrogen cycling in clearcut and alternative silvicultural systems in a montane forest in coastal British Columbia. For Chron 82:844–859.  https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc82844-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Geffen KG, Poorter L, Sass-Klaassen U et al (2010) The trait contribution to wood decomposition rates of 15 Neotropical tree species. Ecology 91:3686–3697.  https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2224.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Weedon JT, Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC et al (2009) Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: A role for trait variation among tree species? Ecol Lett 12:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01259.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodall CW, Westfall JA, Lutes DC, Oswalt SN (2008) End-point diameter and total length coarse woody debris models for the United States. For Ecol Manage 255:3700–3706.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang X, Chen J (2009) Plant litter quality influences the contribution of soil fauna to litter decomposition in humid tropical forests, southwestern China. Soil Biol Biochem 41:910–918.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang HH, Effland MJ, Kirk TK (1980) Factors influencing fungal degradation of lignin in a representative lignocellulosic, thermomechanical pulp. Biotechnol Bioeng 22:65–77.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260220106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yatskov M, Harmon ME, Krankina ON (2003) A chronosequence of wood decomposition in the boreal forests of Russia. Can J For Res 33:1211–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang P, Tian X, He X et al (2008) Effect of litter quality on its decomposition in broadleaf and coniferous forest. Eur J Soil Biol 44:392–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao Z, Wang L, Bai Z et al (2015) Development of population structure and spatial distribution patterns of a restored forest during 17-year succession (1993–2010) in Pingshuo opencast mine spoil, China. Environ Monit Assess 187:2–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4391-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou L, Dai L, Gu H, Zhong L (2007) Review on the decomposition and influence factors of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystem. J For Res 18:48–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-007-0009-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Silviculture and ConservationMinistry of Education, Beijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research StationMoscowUSA
  3. 3.School of Forest Resources and Environmental ScienceMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations