Dependence of functional traits related to growth rates and their CO2 response on multiple habitat climate factors across Arabidopsis thaliana populations

Abstract

The values of many plant traits are often different even within a species as a result of local adaptation. Here, we studied how multiple climate variables influence trait values in Arabidopsis thaliana grown under common conditions. We examined 9 climate variables and 29 traits related to vegetative growth rate in 44 global A. thaliana accessions grown at ambient or elevated CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and applied a multiple regression analysis. We found that genetic variations in the traits related to growth rates were associated with various climate variables. At ambient [CO2], plant size was positively correlated with precipitation in the original habitat. This may be a result of larger biomass investment in roots at the initial stage in plants adapting to a lower precipitation. Stomatal conductance and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency were negatively correlated with vapor pressure deficit, probably as a result of the trade-off between photosynthetic water- and nitrogen-use efficiency. These results suggest that precipitation and air humidity influence belowground and aboveground traits, respectively. Elevated [CO2] altered climate dependences in some of the studied traits. The CO2 response of relative growth rate was negatively correlated with altitude, indicating that plants inhabiting a higher altitude have less plasticity to changing [CO2]. These results are useful not only for understanding evolutionary process but also to predict the plant species that are favored under future global change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control Ac19:716–723

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkin OK, Bloomfield KJ, Reich PB, Tjoelker MG et al (2015) Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits. New Phytol 206:614–636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brachi B, Villoutreix R, Faure N, Hautekèete N, Piquot Y, Pauwels M, Roby D et al (2013) Investigation of the geographical scale of adaptive phenological variation and its underlying genetics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Ecol 22:4222–4240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Breyne P, Rombaut D, Van Gysel A, Van Montagu M, Gerats T (1999) AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Mol Gen Genet 261:627–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron AC, Windmeijer FAG (1997) An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econometr 77:29–342

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD (2009) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr 79:109–126

    Google Scholar 

  8. Debieu M, Tang C, Stich B, Sikosek T, Effgen S, Josephs E, Schmitt J, Nordborg M, Koornneef M, de Meaux J (2013) Co-variation between seed dormancy, growth rate and flowering time changes with latitude in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 8:e61075

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickie JB, Ellis RH, Ktaak HL, Ryder K, Tompsett PB (1990) Temperature and seed storage longevity. Ann Bot 65:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eckert AJ, van Heerwaarden J, Wegrzyn JL, Nelson CD, Ross-Ibarra J, González-Martínez SC, Neale DB (2010) Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae). Genetics 185:969–982

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Field C, Mooney HA (1983) Leaf age and seasonal effects on light, water, and nitrogen use efficiency in a California shrub. Oecologia 56:348–355

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gamalei YV, van Bel AJE, Pakhomova MV, Sjutkina AV (1994) Effects of temperature on the conformation of the endoplasmic reticulum and on starch accumulation in leaves with the symplasmic minor-vein configuration. Planta 194:443–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garnier E (1991) Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants. Trend Ecol Evol 6:126–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffith C, Kim E, Donohue K (2004) Life-history variation and adaptation in the historically mobile plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) in North America. Am J Bot 91:837–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grime JP (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary. Am Nat 111:1169–1194

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hajek P, Kurjak D, von Wühlisch G, Delzon S, Schuldt B (2016) Intraspecific variation in wood anatomical, hydraulic, and foliar traits in ten european beech provenances differing in growth yield. Front Plant Sci 7:791

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hannah MA, Wiese D, Freund S, Fiehn O, Heyer AG, Hincha DK (2006) Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142:98–112

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Amer Nat 173:579–588

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heydel F, Cunze S, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Tackenberg O (2014) Long-distance seed dispersal by wind: disentangling the effects of species traits, vegetation types, vertical turbulence and wind speed. Ecol Res 29:641–651

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hikosaka K, Osone Y (2009) A paradox of leaf-trait convergence: why is leaf nitrogen concentration higher in species with higher photosynthetic capacity? J Plant Res 122:245–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoch G, Popp M, Körner C (2002) Altitudinal increase of mobile carbon pools in Pinus cembra suggests sink limitation of growth at the Swiss treeline. Oikos 98:361–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105:367–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopkins R, Schmitt J, Stinchcombe JR (2008) A latitudinal cline and response to vernalization in leaf angle and morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 179:155–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hunt R (1978) Plant growth analysis. The Institute of Biology’s Studies in Biology Number 96. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Iio A, Hikosaka K, Anten NPR, Nakagawa Y, Ito A (2014) Global dependence of field-observed leaf area index in woody species on climate: a systematic review. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:274–285

    Google Scholar 

  26. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Katabuchi M, Kurokawa H, Davies SJ, Tan S, Nakashizuka T (2012) Soil resource availability shapes community trait structure in a species-rich dipterocarp forest. J Ecol 100:643–651

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koornneef M, Meinke D (2010) The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Plant J 61:909–921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life: Functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  31. Körner C, Diemer M (1987) In situ photosynthetic responses to light, temperature and carbon dioxide in herbaceous plants from low and high altitude. Funct Ecol 1:179–194

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kraft NJ, Valencia R, Ackerly DD (2008) Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322:580–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth-rate between higher-plants—a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3:e4010

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li B, Suzuki JI, Hara T (1998) Latitudinal variation in plant size and relative growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 115:293–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Marquardt DW (1970) Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12:591–612

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moles AT, Perkins SE, Laffan SW, Flores-Moreno H, Awasthy M, Tindall ML, Sack L et al (2014) Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation? J Veg Sci 25:1167–1180

    Google Scholar 

  38. Montesinos-Navarro A, Wig J, Pico FX, Tonsor SJ (2011) Arabidopsis thaliana populations show clinal variation in a climatic gradient associated with altitude. New Phytol 189:282–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nagano S, Nakano T, Hikosaka K, Murata E (2013) Pinus pumila photosynthesis is suppressed by water stress in a wind-exposed mountain site. Arct Antarct Alp Res 45:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nakamura I, Onoda Y, Matsushima N, Yokoyama J, Kawata M, Hikosaka K (2011) Phenotypic and genetic differences in a perennial herb across a natural gradient of CO2 concentration. Oecologia 165:809–818

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. New M, Hulme M, Jones P (1999) Representing twentieth-century space–time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J Clim 12:829–856

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poot P et al (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trend Plant Sci 15:684–692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Oguchi R, Ozaki H, Hanada K, Hikosaka K (2016) Which plant trait explains the variations in relative growth rate and its response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration among Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes derived from a variety of habitats? Oecologia 180:865–876

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Onoda Y, Hirose T, Hikosaka K (2009) Does leaf photosynthesis adapt to CO2-enriched environments? An experiment on plants originating from three natural CO2 springs. New Phytol 182:698–709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pitcairn CER, Grace J (1982) The effect of wind and a reduced supply of phosphorus and nitrogen on the growth and water relations of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Ann Bot 49:649–660

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pitcairn CER, Grace J (1984) The effect of wind on provenances of Molinia caerulea L. Ann Bot 54:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  47. Poorter H, Navas ML (2003) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol 157:175–198

    Google Scholar 

  48. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol 182:565–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Walter A, Fiorani F, Schurr U (2010) A method to construct dose–response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. J Exp Bot 61:2043–2055

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Samis KE, Murren CJ, Bossdorf O, Donohue K, Fenster CB, Malmberg RL, Purugganan MD, Stinchcombe JR (2012) Longitudinal trends in climate drive flowering time clines in North American Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol Evol 2:1162–1180

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sierra-Almeida A, Cavieres LA, Bravo LA (2009) Freezing resistance varies within the growing season and with elevation in high-Andean species of central Chile. New Phytol 182:461–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Stinchcombe JR, Weinig C, Ungerer M, Olsen KM, Mays C, Halldorsdottir SS, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J (2004) A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4712–4717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Taschler D, Beikircher B, Neuner G (2003) Frost resistance and ice nucleation in leaves of five woody timberline species measured in situ during shoot expansion. Tree Physiol 24:331–337

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tonsor SJ, Scheiner SM (2007) Plastic trait integration across a CO2 gradient in Arabidopsis thaliana. Amer Nat 169:E119–E140

    Google Scholar 

  55. Valladares F, Sanchez D, Zavala MA (2006) Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. J Ecol 94:1103–1116

    Google Scholar 

  56. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM (2007) Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 176:749–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang QW, Nagano S, Ozaki H, Morinaga SI, Hidema J, Hikosaka K (2016) Functional differentiation in UV-B-induced DNA damage and growth inhibition between highland and lowland ecotypes of two Arabidopsis species. Environ Exp Bot 131:110–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ward JK, Strain BR (1997) Effects of low and elevated CO2 partial pressure on growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana from different elevations. Plant Cell Environ 20:254–260

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ward JK, Antonovics J, Thomas RB, Strain BR (2000) Is atmospheric CO2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals? Oecologia 123:330–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Warren CR, Adams MA (2005) What determines interspecific variation in relative growth rate of Eucalyptus seedlings? Oecologia 144:373–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Weinig C, Gravuer KA, Kane NC, Schmitt J (2004) Testing adaptive plasticity to UV: costs and benefits of stem elongation and light-induced phenolics. Evolution 58:2645–2655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wolff E, Kull C, Chappellaz J, Fischer H, Miller H, Stocker TF, Watson AJ et al (2005) Modeling past atmospheric CO2: results of a challenge. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 86:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Groom PK, Hikosaka K, Lee W et al (2005) Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:411–421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of the laboratory of plant ecology and functional ecology at Tohoku University for their support in statistical analyses. This work was supported by KAKENHI (nos. 20677001, 21114009, 25291095, 17H03727), Global COE program (J03) and JST CREST Grant number JPMJCR11B3, Japan.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Ozaki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 230 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozaki, H., Oguchi, R. & Hikosaka, K. Dependence of functional traits related to growth rates and their CO2 response on multiple habitat climate factors across Arabidopsis thaliana populations. J Plant Res 131, 987–999 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1058-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ecotype
  • Functional traits
  • Global change
  • Growth analysis
  • Habitat filtering
  • Local adaptation