Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 5, pp 817–825 | Cite as

Suppression of growth and death of meristematic tissues in Abies sachalinensis under strong shading: comparisons between the terminal bud, the terminally lateral bud and the stem cambium

  • Yuko Yasuda
  • Yasuhiro Utsumi
  • Xianfang Tan
  • Naoaki Tashiro
  • Kenji Fukuda
  • Shinya Koga
Regular Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The suppression of apical growth and radial trunk growth in trees under shade is a key factor in the competition mechanism among individuals in natural and artificial forests. However, the timing of apical and radial growth suppression after shading and the physiological processes involved have not been evaluated precisely. Twenty-one Abies sachalinensis seedlings of 5-years-old were shaded artificially under a relative light intensity of 5% for 70 days from August 1, and the histological changes of the terminal bud and terminally lateral bud of terminal leader and the cambial zone of the trunk base were analyzed periodically. In shade-grown trees, cell death of the leaf primordia in a terminal bud of terminal leader was observed in one of the three samples after 56 and 70 days of shading, whereas the leaf primordia in a terminal bud of terminal leader in all open-grown trees survived until the end of the experiment. In addition, the leaf primordia of the terminally lateral buds of terminal leader retained their cell nuclei until the end of the experiment. No histological changes were observed in the cambial cells after shading, but the shade-grown trees had less cambial activity than the open-grown trees through the experiment. Strong shading appeared to inhibit the formation and survival of cells in the terminal bud of terminal leader rather than the terminally lateral buds of terminal leader and the cambium. The suppression of the terminal bud growth and elongation of the surviving lateral buds would result in an umbrella-shaped crown under shade.

Keywords

Abies sachalinensis Cambium Leaf primordia Shade Terminal bud Terminally lateral bud 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Yan Xiang and the staff of Ashoro Research Forest, Kyushu University for supporting nursery experiment. The authors thank the members of the Laboratory of Forest Production Control, Kyushu University, for valuable comments on our manuscript. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant numbers 26450233 and 15H0245.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Yusra AFI, Bhat AH, Jawaid M (2010) Cell wall ultrastructure, anatomy, lignin distribution, and chemical composition of Malaysian cultivated kenaf fiber. Ind Crops Prod 31:113–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albaugh JM, Albaugh TJ, Heiderman RR et al (2014) Evaluating changes in switchgrass physiology, biomass, and light-use efficiency under artificial shade to estimate yields if intercropped with Pinus taeda L. Agrofor Syst 88:489–503.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9708-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonova G, Stasova V (1993) Effects of environmental factors on wood formation in Scots pine stems. Trees 7:214–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00202076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa ACF, Pace MR, Witovisk L, Angyalossy V (2010) A new method to obtain good anatomical slides of heterogeneous plant parts. IAWA J 31:373–383Google Scholar
  5. Beaudet M, Messier C (1998) Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Can J For Res 28:1007–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bormann FH (1965) Changes in the growth pattern of white pine trees undergoing suppression. Ecology 46:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canham CD (1988) Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69:786–795.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH (1994) Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forets: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can J For Res 24:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chazdon RL (1988) Sunflecks and their importance to forest understorey plants. Adv Ecol Res 18:1–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60179-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denne MP (1974) Effects of light intensity on tracheid dimensions in Picea sitchensis. Ann Bot 38:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong T, Li J, Zhang Y et al (2015) Partial shading of lateral branches affects growth, and foliage nitrogen-and water-use efficiencies in the conifer Cunninghamia lanceolata growing in a warm monsoon climate. Tree Physiol 35:632–643.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Duchesneau R, Lesage I, Messier C, Morin H (2001) Effects of light and intraspecific competition on growth and crown morphology of two size classes of understory balsam fir saplings. For Ecol Manage 140:215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00281-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin J (2002) Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using douglas-fir forests as an example. For Ecol Manage 155:399–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00575-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME (1987) Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 37:550–556.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1310665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92.  https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray AN, Spies TA (1996) Gap size, within-gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. J Ecol 84:635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greis I, Kellomaki S (1981) Crown structure and stem growth of norway spruce undergrowth under varying shading. Silva Fenn 15:306–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groninger JW, Seiler JR, Peterson JA, Richard E (1996) Growth and photosynthetic responses of four Virginia Piedmont tree species to shade. Tree Physiol 16:773–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Häsler H, Senn J, Edwards PJ (2008) Light-dependent growth responses of young Abies alba to simulated ungulate browsing. Funct Ecol 22:48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.0 Google Scholar
  20. Horn HS (1971) The adaptive geometry of trees. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Junghans U, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Polle A, Teichmann T (2004) Effect of auxin transport inhibitors and ethylene on the wood anatomy of poplar. Plant Biol 6:22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44712 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawanabe S, Shidei T (1968) Ecological studies on the influence of light intensity upon the growth and development of forest trees (III): Effects of shading on the growth of some coniferous seedlings. Bull Kyoto Univ For 40:111–121 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  23. Kidombo SD, Dean TJ (2018) Growth response of branches to variation in the intra- and interbranch supply of photosynthate. Trees (Online). https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1711-2. Accessed 5 June 2018
  24. Kienholz R (1934) Leader, needle, cambial, and root growth of certain conifers and their interrelations. Bot Gaz 96:73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King DA (1997) Branch growth and biomass allocation in Abies amabilis saplings in contrasting light environments. Tree Physiol 17:251–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klinka K, Wang Q, Kayahara GJ et al (1992) Light-growth response relationships in pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis) and sub-alpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa). Can J Bot 70:1919–1930.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b92-239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kohyama T (1980) Growth pattern of Abies mariesii saplings under conditions of open-growth and suppression. Bot Mag Tokyo 93:13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kozlowski TT, Peterson TA (1962) Seasonal growth of dominant, intermediate, and suppressed red pine trees. Bot Gaz 124:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuo J (ed) (2014) Electron microscopy methods and protocols, 3rd edn. Humana, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  30. Nakaba S, Funada R, Sano Y (2013) Disappearance of microtubules, nuclei and starch during cell death of ray parenchyma in Abies sachalinensis. IAWA J 34:135–146.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-00000012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakaba S, Takata N, Yoshida M, Funada R (2015) Continuous expression of genes for xylem cysteine peptidases in long-lived ray parenchyma cells in Populus. Plant Biotechnol 32:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.1208a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niinemets Ü (2010) A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol Res 25:693–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Connell BM, Kelty MJ (1994) Crown architecture of understory and open-grown white pine (Pinus strobus L.) saplings. Tree Physiol 14:89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/14.1.89 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Parke RV (1959) Growth periodicity and the shoot tip of Abies concolor. Am J Bot 46(2):110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parent S, Morin H, Messier C (2002) Missing growth rings at the trunk base in suppressed balsam fir saplings. Can J For Res 32:1776–1783.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pedersen BS (1998) The role of stress in the mortality of midwestern oaks as indicated by growth prior to death. Ecology 79:79–93. 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0079:TROSIT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peet RK, Christensen NL (1987) Competition and tree death. Bioscience 37:586–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petritan AM, von Lüpke B, Petritan IC (2009) Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. Eur J For Res 128:61–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0239-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rathgeber CBK, Rossi S, Bontemps JD (2011) Cambial activity related to tree size in a mature silver-fir plantation. Ann Bot 108:429–438.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr168 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T (2006) Assessment of cambial activity and xylogenesis by microsampling tree species: an example at the alpine timberline. IAWA J 27:383–394.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schoonmaker AL, Hacke UG, LandhäUsser SM et al (2010) Hydraulic acclimation to shading in boreal conifers of varying shade tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 33:382–393.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02088.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schulte PJ (2012) Vertical and radial profiles in tracheid characteristics along the trunk of douglas-fir trees with implications for water transport. Trees 26:421–433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0603-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schweingruber FH (2007) Wood structure and environment. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Shirley HL (1943) Is torelance the capacity to endure shade? J For 41:339–345Google Scholar
  45. Thibeault-Martel M, Krause C, Morin H, Rossi S (2008) Cambial activity and intra-annual xylem formation in roots and stems of Abies balsamea and Picea mariana. Ann Bot 102:667–674.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn146 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Tucker GF, Hinckley TM, Leverenz J, Jiang S (1987) Adjustments of foliar morphology in the acclimation of understory pacific silver fir following clearcutting. For Ecol Manage 21:249–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90047-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker LR, Vitousek PM (2011) An invader alters germination and growth of native dominant tree in Hawai’i. Ecology 72:1449–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watanabe Y, Ichikawa S, Kubota M et al (2015) Morphological defects in native Japanese fir trees around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Sci Rep 5:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13232 Google Scholar
  49. Wright EF, Canham CD, Coates KD (2000) Effects of suppression and release on sapling growth for 11 tree species of northern, interior British Columbia. Can J For Res 30:1571–1580.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yasuda Y, Utsumi Y, Tashiro N, Koga S, Fukuda K (2018) Cessation of annual apical growth and partial death of cambium in stem of Abies sachalinensis under intensive shading. J Plant Res 131:261–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-017-0984-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoshida Y, Nakamura K, Hiura A (1983) Contraction of chromosomes and depression RNA synthesis by Isopropyl N- (3-Chlorophenyl) Carbamate (CIPC) in Vicia faba root tip cells. Cytologia (Tokyo) 48:707–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao Q, Pang X, Bao W, He Q (2015) Effects of gap-model thinning intensity on the radial growth of gap-edge trees with distinct crown classes in a spruce plantation. Trees Struct Funct 29:1861–1870.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1267-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuko Yasuda
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Utsumi
    • 2
  • Xianfang Tan
    • 1
  • Naoaki Tashiro
    • 2
  • Kenji Fukuda
    • 3
  • Shinya Koga
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations