Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 5, pp 879–885 | Cite as

Development and characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the sea sandwort, Honckenya peploides

  • Meg C. Gravley
  • George K. Sage
  • Sandra L. Talbot
  • Matthew L. Carlson
Technical Note
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Codominant marker systems are better suited to analyze population structure and assess the source of an individual in admixture analyses. Currently, there is no codominant marker system using microsatellites developed for the sea sandwort, Honckenya peploides (L.) Ehrh., an early colonizer in island systems. We developed and characterized novel microsatellite loci from H. peploides, using reads collected from whole genome shotgun sequencing on a 454 platform. The combined output from two shotgun runs yielded a total of 62,669 reads, from which 58 loci were screened. We identified 12 polymorphic loci that amplified reliably and exhibited disomic inheritance. Microsatellite data were collected and characterized for the 12 polymorphic loci in two Alaskan populations of H. peploides: Fossil Beach, Kodiak Island (n = 32) and Egg Bay, Atka Island (n = 29). The Atka population exhibited a slightly higher average number of alleles (3.9) and observed heterozygosity (0.483) than the Kodiak population (3.3 and 0.347, respectively). The overall probability of identity values for both populations was PID = 2.892e−6 and PIDsib = 3.361e−3. We also screened the 12 polymorphic loci in Wilhelmsia physodes (Fisch. ex Ser.) McNeill, the most closely related species to H. peploides, and only one locus was polymorphic. These microsatellite markers will allow future investigations into population genetic and colonization patterns of the beach dune ruderal H. peploides on new and recently disturbed islands.

Keywords

Honckenya peploides Sea sandwort Microsatellites Disomic inheritance Next-generation sequencing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Stephen Talbot and Hunter Gravley (USFWS) assisted in sample collection of Honckenya peploides. Special thanks to Janet Jorgensen and her team (USFWS) for collecting cross-species screen specimens (Wilhelmsia physodes) and William Leacock (USFWS) for field support on Kodiak Island. Funding was provided by the USGS Regional Director’s Office and a North Pacific Research Board Grant to USGS. Travel to Kodiak was made possible through a LGL Alaska Graduate Ecology Research Award to MCG provided through the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA). This manuscript was improved by comments from Brandon Briggs (UAA), John Pearce (USGS) and two anonymous reviewers. Special thanks to Barbara Pierson (USGS) for data curation. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Danzmann RG (1997) Secondary tetrasomic segregation of MDH-B and preferential pairing of homeologues in rainbow trout. Genetics 145:1083–1092PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardren WR, Borer S, Thrower F et al (1999) Inheritance of 12 microsatellite loci in Oncorhynchus mykiss. J Hered 90:529–536.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.5.529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Árnason SH, Thórsson ǼT, Magnússon B et al (2014) Spatial genetic structure of the sea sandwort (Honckenya peploides) on Surtsey: an immigrant’s journey. Biogeosciences 11:6495–6507.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6495-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnaud-Haond S, Belkhir K (2007) GENCLONE: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol Ecol Notes 7:15–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01522.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashley MV, Wilk JA, Styan SM et al (2003) High variability and disomic segregation of microsatellites in the octoploid Fragaria virginiana Mill. (Rosaceae). Theor Appl Genet 107:1201–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1370-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonin A, Bellemain E, Eidesen PB et al (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02346.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Alsos IG et al (2004) Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82:521–536.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00332.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2003) AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites. Mol Ecol 12:1979–1991.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01856.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpää MJ (2004) BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 20:2363–2369.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth250 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK, Putnam KA (2008) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the Hawaiian endemic shrub Schiedea adamantis (Caryophyllaceae) and amplification in related species and genera. Mol Ecol Resour 8:1081–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02161.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Davey JL, Blaxter MW (2010) RADseq: next-generation population genetics. Brief Funct Genom 9:416–423.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elq031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeGange AR, Byrd GV, Walker LR, Waythomas C (2010) Introduction- the impacts of the 2008 eruption of Kasatochi volcano on terrestrial and marine ecosystems in the Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Arctic. Antarct Alp Res 42:245–249.  https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorken ME, Eckert CG (2001) Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). J Ecol 89:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Faircloth BC (2008) MSATCOMMANDER: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01884.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gautier M, Gharbi K, Cezard T et al (2013) The effect of RAD allele dropout on the estimation of genetic variation within and between populations. Mol Ecol 22:3165–3178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12089 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gravley MC, Pierson BJ, Sage GK, Talbot SL (2018) Microsatellite genetic data for sea sandwort (Honckenya peploides) and merckia (Wilhelmsia physodes), Alaska 2009–2016: U.S. Geological Survey data release.  https://doi.org/10.5066/F7BC3XRP
  18. Halkett F, Simon J-C, Balloux F (2005) Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 20:194–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Handel CM, Pajot LM, Talbot SL, Sage GK (2006) Use of buccal swabs for sampling DNA from nestling and adult birds. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1094:UOBSFS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harbaugh DT, Nepokroeff M, Rabeler RK et al (2010) A new lineage based tribal classification of the family Caryophyllaceae. Int J Plant Sci 171:185–198.  https://doi.org/10.1086/648993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hogan FE, Cooke R, Norman JA (2009) Reverse ascertainment bias in microsatellite allelic diversity in owls (Aves, Strigiformes). Conserv Genet 10:635–638.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9595-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IUCN (2016) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 21 Dec 2016
  23. Johnson KP, Adler FR, Cherry JL (2000) Genetic and phylogenetic consequences of island biogeography. Evolution 54:387–396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00041.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Comber SC, Ainouche ML, Kovarik A, Leitch AR (2010) Making a functional diploid: from polysomic to disomic inheritance. New Phytol 186:113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03117.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Malling H (1957) The chromosome number of Honckenya peploides (L.) Ehrh., with a note on its mode of sex determination. Hereditas 43:517–524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1957.tb03454.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nybom H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol 13:1143–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Oetting WS, Lee HK, Flanders DJ et al (1995) Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared fluorescence and M13 tailed primers. Genomics 30:450–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsen JB, Wilson SL, Kretschmer EJ et al (2000) Characterization of 14 tetranucleotide microsatellite loci derived from sockeye salmon. Mol Ecol 9:2185–2187.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01053-2.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ouborg NJ, Piquot Y, Van Groenendael JM (1999) Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J Ecol 87:551–568.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00389.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paetkau D (2003) An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories. Mol Ecol 12:1375–1387.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01820.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Park S (2000) Microsatellite Toolkit for MS Excel 97 or 2000 (PC)Google Scholar
  32. Philipp M, Adsersen H (2014) Colonization of an empty island: how does a plant with a plastic gender system respond? Biogeosciences 11:6657–6665.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6657-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2): population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2409177 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakai AK, Weller SG, Wagner WL et al (2006) Adaptive radiation and evolution of breeding systems in Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae), an endemic Hawaiian genus. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 93:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sánchez-Vilas J, Retuerto R (2009) Sex-specific physiological, allocation and growth responses to water availability in the subdioecious plant Honckenya peploides. Plant Biol 11:243–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00105.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sánchez-Vilas J, Philipp M, Retuerto R (2010) Unexpectedly high genetic variation in large unisexual clumps of the subdioecious plant Honckenya peploides (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Biol 12:518–525.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00231.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sobel E, Papp JC, Lange K (2002) Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics. Am J Hum Genet 70:496–508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonsthagen SA, Sage GK, Fowler MC et al (2013) Development and characterization of 21 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the barren-ground shrew, Sorex ugyunak (Mammalia: Sorcidae), through next-generation sequencing, and cross-species amplification in the masked shrew S. cinereus. Conserv Genet Resour 5:315–318.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-012-9792-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stewart CN Jr, Via LE (1993) A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications. Biotechniques 14:748–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Stift M, Berenos C, Kuperus P, van Tienderen PH (2008) Segregation models for disomic, tetrasomic and intermediate inheritance in tetraploids: a general procedure applied to Rorippa (yellow cress) microsatellite data. Genetics 179:2113–2123.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.085027 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Talbot SS, Talbot SL, Walker LR (2010) Post-eruption legacy effects and their implications for long-term recovery of the vegetation on Kasatochi Island, Alaska. Arctic. Antarct Alp Res 42:285–296.  https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.3.285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Talbot SL, Sage GK, Rearick JR et al (2016) The structure of genetic diversity in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) along the north pacific and bering sea coasts of Alaska. PLoS One 11:1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8278 Google Scholar
  46. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wan QH, Wu H, Fujihara T, Fang S-G (2004) Which genetic marker for which conservation genetics issue? Electrophoresis 25:2165–2176.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305922 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilberg MJ, Dreher BP (2004) GENECAP: a program for analysis of multilocus genotype data for non-invasive sampling and capture-recapture population estimation. Mol Ecol Notes 4:783–785.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00797.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang S, Bishop JG, Webster MS (2008) Colonization genetics of an animal-dispersed plant (Vaccinium membranaceum) at Mount St Helens, Washington. Mol Ecol 17:731–740.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03625.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meg C. Gravley
    • 1
    • 2
  • George K. Sage
    • 1
  • Sandra L. Talbot
    • 1
  • Matthew L. Carlson
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science CenterAnchorageUSA
  2. 2.Biological Sciences DepartmentUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA
  3. 3.University of Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Center for Conservation ScienceAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations