Floral meristem size and organ number correlation in Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae)

Abstract

We present a comparative flower ontogenetic study in five species of the genus Eucryphia with the aim of testing whether differences in the organ number observed can be explained by changes in the meristematic size of floral meristem and floral organs. Species native to Oceania, viz. E. milliganii, E. lucida and E. moorei, have the smallest gynoecia with ca. 6 carpels, while the Chilean E. glutinosa and E. cordifolia present more than ten carpels. E. milliganii has the smallest flower with the lowest stamen number (ca. 50), while the other species produce around 200 stamens and more. Standardized measurements of meristematic sectors were taken in 49 developing flowers that were classified into three well-defined ontogenetic stages. Sizes of meristems varied significantly among species within each developmental stage as revealed by ANOVA analyses. Significant regressions between organ number and corresponding meristem size were consistent with the premise that a larger meristem size prior to organ initiation could be determining for a higher organ number. Flower organogenesis in Eucryphia also involves relevant meristem expansion while the organs are initiated, which results in a particular androecium patterning with a chaotic stamen arrangement. Meristem expansion also appears to be slower but more extensive in species with larger initial meristematic size, suggesting that flower phenotype can be determined in ontogeny by this heterochronic interplay of space and time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abbott RJ, Schmitt J (1985) Effect of environment on percentage female ray florets per capitulum and outcrossing potential in a self-compatible composite (Senecio vulgaris L. var hibernicus Syme). New Phytol 101:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo MTK, Pacheco DA, Aguilera P (2013) Floral allocation at different altitudes in highly autogamous alpine Chaetanthera euphrasioides (Asteraceae) in the central Chilean Andes. Alp Botany 123:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barabé D, Lacroix C (2008) Developmental morphology of the flower of Anaphyllopsis americana and its relevance to our understanding of basal Araceae. Botany 86:1467–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battjes J, Bachmann K (1994) Phenotypic plasticity of capitulum morphogenesis in Microseris pygmaea (Asteracea: Lactuceae). Ann Bot 73:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baush J (1938) A revision of the Eucryphiaceae. Bull Misc Inform (Royal Gardens, Kew) 1938:318–349

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bull-Hereñu K, Arroyo MTK (2009) Phenological and morphological differentiation in annual Chaetanthera moenchioides (Asteraceae) over an aridity gradient. Plant Syst Evol 278:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bull-Hereñu K, Ronse de Craene L, Pérez F (2016) Flower meristematic size correlates with heterostylous morphs in two Chilean Oxalis (Oxalidaceae) species. Flora 221:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlton WA (1991) Studies in the Alismataceae. IX. Development of the flower in Ranalisma humile. Can J Bot 69:2790–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlton WA, Posluszny U (1991) Meristic variation in Potamogeton flowers. Bot J Linn Soc 106:265–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark SE, Running MP, Meyerowitz EM (1993) CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Devel 119:397–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dickison WC (1978) Comparative anatomy of Eucryphiaceae. Am J Bot 65:722–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donoso C (1987) Variación natural en especies Nothofagus en Chile. Bosque 8:85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Doust AN, Kellogg EA (2002) Inflorescence diversification in the panicoid bristle grass clade (Paniceae: Poaceae): evidence from molecular phylogenies and developmental morphology. Am J Bot 89:1203–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dress WJ (1956) A review of the genus Eucryphia. Baileya 4:116–127

    Google Scholar 

  15. Endress PK (1987) Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. Bot Jahrb Syst 108:417–438

    Google Scholar 

  16. Endress PK (2014) Multicarpellate gynoecia in angiosperms: occurrence, development, organization and architectural constraints. Bot J Linn Soc 174:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Forster PI, Hyland BPM (1997) Two new species of Eucryphia Cav. (Cunoniaceae) from Queensland. Austrobaileya 4:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harris EM, Tucker SC, Urbatsch L (1991) Floral Initiation and Early Development in Erigeron philadelphicus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 78:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jerominek M, Bull-Hereñu K, Arndt M, Classen-Bockhoff R (2014) Live imaging of developmental processes in a living meristem of Davidia involucrata (Nyssaceae). Front Plant Sci 5:613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo Y, Bian F, Luo Y (2012) Different patterns of floral ontogeny in dimorphic flowers of Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Caryophyllaceae). Int J Plant Sci 173:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maad J, Armbuster WS, Fenster CB (2013) Floral size variation in Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae) along altitudinal gradients: patterns and possible selective mechanisms. Nordic J Bot 31:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayers AM, Lord EM (1984) Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. III. A, histological study. Bot Gaz 145:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neuffer B, Paetsch M (2013) Flower morphology and pollen germination in the genus Capsella (Brassicaceae). Flora 208:626–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oraei M, Gohari G, Esmaillou Z, Naghiloo S (2013) Comparative ontogeny of perfect and pistillate florets in Senecio vernalis (Asteraceae). Flora 208:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ronse De Craene L (2018) Understanding the role of floral development in the evolution of angiosperm flowers: a clarification from different perspectives. J Plant Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1021-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ronse De Craene L (2016) Meristic changes in flowering plants: How flowers play with numbers. Flora 221:22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ronse De Craene L (2017) Floral development of the endangered genus Medusagyne (Medusagynaceae-Malpighiales): spatial constraints of stamen and carpel increase. Int J Plant Sci 178:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Suárez LH, Pérez F, Armesto JJ (2011) Strong phenotypic variation in floral design and display traits of an annual tarweed in relation to small-scale topographic heterogeneity in semiarid Chile. Int J Plant Sci 172:1012–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Q, Zhao C, Dong X, Ma X, Hou Z, Li Y (2015) Relationship between flower size and leaf size, number of Stellera chamaejasme population of degraded alpine grassland along an altitude gradient. Chin J Ecol 34:40–46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge AI for providing the collection and photography of E. moorei. The present work was presented at the JPR International Symposium organized by The Japanese Society of Plant Morphology and Fundación Flores at the 80th Annual Meeting of Botanical Society of Japan in September 2016 in Okinawa. We acknowledge JPR for covering the expenses for attending to this conference. This work has been funded by Fondecyt-Conicyt grant projects 11150847 and 3130417. We acknowledge Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE) for providing suitable material of Eucryphia and Frieda Christie for technical assistance with the SEM. RBGE is supported by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services Division.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kester Bull-Hereñu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 188 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bull-Hereñu, K., Ronse de Craene, L. & Pérez, F. Floral meristem size and organ number correlation in Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae). J Plant Res 131, 429–441 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1030-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Flower development
  • Androecium
  • Polyandry
  • Polycarpellate gynoecium
  • Meristem size
  • Meristem expansion
  • Cunoniaceae