Factors influencing distribution and local coexistence of diploids and tetraploids of Vicia cracca: inferences from a common garden experiment
- 223 Downloads
Vicia cracca diploids and autotetraploids are highly parapatric in Europe; tetraploids reside in western and northern part, whereas diploids occupy much drier south-eastern part. They meet together in a Central European contact zone. This distribution pattern raised questions about a transformative effect of polyploidization on plant performance and environmental tolerances. We investigated plant survival, growth, and seed production in two water regimes in a common garden experiment using seeds collected from five localities in the Central European contact zone where diploids and tetraploids occur in sympatry. Obtained data imply that tetraploids of V. cracca are not generally superior in performance to diploids. Significantly larger seeds from tetraploid mother plants collected in the field were not correlated with greater stature of the seedlings. Nonetheless, tetraploids might have a potential to out-compete diploids in the long run due to the tetraploids’ ability of greater growth which manifested in the second year of cultivation. Considering the response of diploids and tetraploids to water supply, drought stressed tetraploids but not diploids produced a higher proportion of aborted seeds than watered ones, which implies that tetraploids are more drought susceptible than diploids. On the other hand, decreased plant height in drought stresses tetraploids, which simultaneously increased total seed production, may suggest that tetraploids have a greater ability to avoid local extinction under unfavourable conditions by enhancing biomass allocation into production of seeds at the cost of lower growth. The significant interaction between ploidy level and locality in several traits suggests possible polyfyletic origin of tetraploids and the necessity to clarify the history of the tetraploids in Europe.
KeywordsDrought stress Polyploid Seed production Seed weight Sympatric Vegetative growth
The study was supported by project GAČR P505-13-32048S. It was also partly supported by institutional research project RVO 67985939, and MSMT. We owe a particular debt of gratitude to the first author’s husband for help with seed collection in the field and her mother, who helped with the garden experiment. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their comments, criticisms, and detailed suggestions.
- Abrahamson WG (1980) Demography and vegetative reproduction. In: Solbrig OT (ed) Demography and evolution in plant populations. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 89–106Google Scholar
- Chrtková A (1995) Vicia L. In: Slavík B (ed) Květena České republiky 4. Academia, Prague, pp 386–414Google Scholar
- Hao G-Y, Lucero ME, Sanderson SC et al (2013) Polyploidy enhances the occupation of heterogeneous environments through hydraulic related trade-offs in Atriplex canescens (Chenopodiaceae). New Phytol 197:970–978. doi: 10.1111/nph.12051
- Hosseini H, Chehrazi M, Sorestani MM, Ahmadi D (2013) Polyploidy and comparison of diploid and autotetraploid seedling of Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus cv. alba).Google Scholar
- Levin DA (2002) The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ, Anderson JT et al (2015) Natural variation, differentiation, and genetic trade-offs of ecophysiological traits in response to water limitation in Brachypodium distachyon and its descendent allotetraploid B. hybridum (Poaceae). Evol Int J org Evol 69:2689–2704. doi: 10.1111/evo.12776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soltis DE, Buggs RJA, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS (2010) What we still don’t know about polyploidy. Taxon 59:1387–1403Google Scholar
- Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Trávníček P, Eliášová A, Suda J (2010) The distribution of cytotypes of Vicia cracca in Central Europe: the changes that have occurred over the last four decades. Preslia 82:149–163Google Scholar
- Weissmannová H et al (2004) Ostravsko. In: Mackovčin P, Sedláček M (eds) Chráněná území ČR, Vol. X. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny and EkoCentrum Brno, PragueGoogle Scholar