Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 129, Issue 4, pp 771–779 | Cite as

Hydrogen photoproduction in green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sustainable over 2 weeks with the original cell culture without supply of fresh cells nor exchange of the whole culture medium

  • Takafumi Yagi
  • Kyohei Yamashita
  • Norihide Okada
  • Takumi Isono
  • Daisuke Momose
  • Shigeru Mineki
  • Eiji Tokunaga
Regular Paper

Abstract

Unicellular green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are known to make hydrogen photoproduction under the anaerobic condition with water molecules as the hydrogen source. Since the hydrogen photoproduction occurs for a cell to circumvent crisis of its survival, it is only temporary. It is a challenge to realize persistent hydrogen production because the cells must withstand stressful conditions to survive with alternation of generations in the cell culture. In this paper, we have found a simple and cost-effective method to sustain the hydrogen production over 14 days in the original culture, without supply of fresh cells nor exchange of the culture medium. This is achieved for the cells under hydrogen production in a sulfur-deprived culture solution on the {anaerobic, intense light} condition in a desiccator, by periodically providing a short period of the recovery time (2 h) with a small amount of TAP(+S) supplied outside of the desiccator. As this operation is repeated, the response time of transition into hydrogen production (preparation time) is shortened and the rate of hydrogen production (build up time) is increased. The optimum states of these properties favorable to the hydrogen production are attained in a few days and stably sustained for more than 10 days. Since generations are alternated during this consecutive hydrogen production experiment, it is suggested that the improved hydrogen production properties are inherited to next generations without genetic mutation. The properties are reset only when the cells are placed on the {sulfur-sufficient, aerobic, moderate light} conditions for a long time (more than 1 day at least).

Keywords

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Green algae Hydrogen photoproduction Anaerobic condition Sulfur deprivation Non-genetic inheritance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Toshitaka Niwase for his helping T.Y. to measure the correction curve from the sensor voltage to the hydrogen concentration.

References

  1. Allakhverdiev SI (2012) Photosynthetic and biomimetic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:8744–8752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allakhverdiev SI, Kreslavski VD, Thavasi V, Zharmukhamedov SK, Klimov VV, Nagata T, Nishihara H, Ramakrishna S (2009) Hydrogen photoproduction by use of photosynthetic organisms and biomimetic systems. Photochem Photobiol S 8:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allakhverdiev SI, Thavasi V, Kreslavski VD, Zharmukhamedov SK, Klimov VV, Ramakrishna S, Los DA, Mimuro M, Nishihara H, Carpentier R (2010) Photosynthetic hydrogen production. Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 11:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amos WA (2004) Updated cost analysis of photobiological hydrogen production from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii green algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, NREL/MP-560-35593. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/analysis_repository/project.cfm/PID=110. Accessed 06 Apr 2016
  5. Antal TK, Krendeleva TE, Laurinavichene TV, Makarova VV, Ghirardi ML, Rubin AB, Tsygankov AA, Seibert M (2003) The dependence of algal H2 production on photosystem II and O2 consumption activities in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1607:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Antal TK, Volgusheva AA, Kukarskih GP, Krendeleva TE, Rubin AB (2009) Relationships between H2 photoproduction and different electron transport pathways in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:9087–9094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antal TK, Krendeleva TE, Rubin AB (2011) Acclimation of green algae to sulfur deficiency: underlying mechanisms and application for hydrogen production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:3–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Antal TK, Matorin DN, Kukarskikh GP, Lambreva MD, Tyystjarvi E, Krendeleva TE, Tsygankov AA, Rubin AB (2014) Pathways of hydrogen photoproduction by immobilized Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells deprived of sulfur. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:18194–18203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atsumi S, Cann AF, Connor MR, Shen CR, Smith KM, Brynildsen MP, Chou KJY, Hanai T, Liao JC (2008) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for 1-butanol production. Metab Eng 10:305–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Babu VJ, Kumar MK, Nair AS, Kheng TL, Allakhverdiev SI (2012) Visible light photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production from N–TiO2 rice grain shaped electrospun nanostructures. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:8897–8904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chochois V, Dauvillee D, Beyly A, Tolleter D, Cuine S, Timpano H, Ball S, Cournac L, Peltier G (2009) Hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas: photosystem II-dependent and -independent pathways differ in their requirement for starch metabolism. Plant Physiol 151:631–640CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Clowez S, Godaux D, Cardol P, Wollman FA, Rappaport F (2015) The involvement of hydrogen-producing and ATP-dependent NADPH-consuming pathways in setting the redox poise in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in anoxia. Biol Chem 290:8666–8676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox GM, McCrimmon BMD, Nemati TA, Olson CM (2013) The production of hydrogen gas by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in sulfur-deprived conditions under red light and white light. Exped Arch 3:1–18Google Scholar
  14. Das D, Dutta T, Nath K, Kotay SM, Das AK, Veziroglu TN (2006) Role of Fe-hydrogenase in biological hydrogen production. Curr Sci 90:1627–1637Google Scholar
  15. Fouchard S, Hemschemeier A, Caruana A, Pruvost J, Legrand J, Happe T, Peltier G, Cournac L (2005) Autotrophic and mixotrophic hydrogen photoproduction in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 10:6199–6205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritsch J, Scheerer P, Frielingsdorf S, Kroschinsky S, Friedrich B, Lenz O, Spahn CMT (2011) The crystal structure of an oxygen-tolerant hydrogenase uncovers a novel iron-sulphur centre. Nature 479:249–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grewe S, Ballottari M, Alcocer M, D’Andrea C, Blifernez-Klassen O, Hankamer B, Mussgnug JH, Bassi R, Krusea O (2014) Light-harvesting complex protein LHCBM9 is critical for photosystem II activity and hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 26:1598–1611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hankamera B, Lehrb F, Rupprechta J, Mussgnugc JH, Postenb C, Krusec O (2007) Photosynthetic biomass and H2 production by green algae: from bioengineering to bioreactor scale-up. Physiol Plant 131:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isono T, Yamashita K, Momose D, Kobayashi H, Kitamura M, Nishiyama Y, Hosoya T, Kanda H, Kudo A, Okada N, Yagi T, Nakata K, Mineki S, Tokunaga E (2015) Scan-free absorbance spectral imaging A(x, y, λ) of single live algal cells for quantifying absorbance of cell suspensions. PLoS One 10:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1998) Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. Evol Biol 11:159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jablonka E, Lachmann M, Lamb MJ (1992) Evidence, mechanisms and models for the inheritance of acquired characters. Theor Biol 158:245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim JP, Kang CD, Sim SJ, Kim MS, Park TH, Lee DH, Kim DJ, Kim JH, Lee YK, Pak DW (2005) Cell age optimization for hydrogen production induced by sulfur deprivation using a green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii UTEX 90. Microbiol Biotechnol 15:131–135Google Scholar
  23. Kim JP, Kang CD, Park TH, Kim MS, Sim SJ (2006) Enhanced hydrogen production by controlling light intensity in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii culture. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:1585–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruse O, Rupprecht J, Bader KP, Thormas-Hall S, Schenk PM, Finazzi G, Hankamer B (2005) Improved photobiological H2 production in engineered green algal cells. Biol Chem 280:34170–34177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levin MD (2003) Noise in gene expression as the source of non-genetic individuality in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 550:135–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Huang S, Yu J, Wang Q, Wu S (2013) Improvement of hydrogen production of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by co-cultivation with isolated bacteria. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:10779–10787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mameli M (2004) Nongenetic selevtion and nongenetic inheritance. Br J Philos Sci 55:35–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markov SA, Eivazova ER, Greenwood J (2006) Photostimulation of H2 production in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii upon photoinhibition of its O2-evolving system. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:1314–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Masukawa H, Sakurai H, Hausinger RP, Inoue K (2014) Sustained photobiological hydrogen production in the presence of N2 by nitrogenase mutants of the heterocyst-forming cyanobacterium Anabaena. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:19444–19451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsumura K, Yagi T, Yasuda K (2003) Role of timer and sizer in regulation of Chlamydomonas cell cycle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 306:1042–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Melis A, Happe T (2001) Hydrogen production. Green algae as a source of energy. Plant Physiol 127:740–748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Morsy FM (2011) Acetate versus sulfur deprivation role in creating anaerobiosis in light for hydrogen production by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Spirulina platensis: two different organisms and two different mechanisms. Photochem Photobiol 87:137–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Najafpour MM, Allakhverdiev SI (2012) Manganese compounds as water oxidizing catalysts for hydrogen production via water splitting: from manganese complexes to nano-sized manganese oxides. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:8753–8764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nath K, Najafpour MM, Voloshin RA, Balaghi SE, Tyystjarvi E, Timilsina R, Eaton-Rye JJ, Tomo T, Nam HG, Nishihara H, Ramakrishna S, Shen JR, Allakhverdiev SI (2015) Photobiological hydrogen production and artificial photosynthesis for clean energy: from bio to nanotechnologies. Photosynth Res 126:237–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Omata T, Ogawa T (1985) Changes in the polypeptide composition of the cytoplasmic membrane in the cyanobacterium Anacystis nidulans during adaptation to low CO2 conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 26:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pal C, Miklos I (1999) Epigenetic inheritance, genetic assimilation and speciation. J Theor Biol 200:19–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Saenz ME, Bisova K, Touloupakis E, Faraloni C, Marzio WDD, Torzillo G (2015) Evidences of oxidative stress during hydrogen photoproduction in sulfur-deprived cultures of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:10410–10417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saito K, Rutherfordc AW, Ishikita H (2013) Mechanism of proton-coupled quinone reduction in photosystem II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:954–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakurai H, Masukawa H, Kitashima M, Inoue K (2013) Photobiological hydrogen production Bioenergetics and challenges for its practical application. Photochem Photobiol 17:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saleem M, Chakrabarti MH, Raman AAA, Hasan DB, Daud WMAW, Mustafa A (2012) Hydrogen production by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in a two-stage process with and without illumination at alkaline pH. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:4930–4934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon F (1981) Specification of cell morphology by endogenous determinants. Cell Biol 90:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spudich JL, Koshland DK Jr (1976) Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262:467–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stojkovic D, Torzillo G, Faraloni C, Valant M (2015) Hydrogen production by sulfur-deprived TiO2- encapsulated Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:3201–3206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. The Chlamydomonas sourcebook 2 (2008) Organellar and metabolic processes 2nd edition by David Stern (Ed.)Google Scholar
  45. Tsygankov AA, Kosourov SN, Tolstygina IV, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M (2006) Hydrogen production by sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under photoautotrophic conditions. Int J Hydrog Energy 31:1574–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Volgusheva A, Styring S, Mamedov F (2013) Increased photosystem II stability promotes H2 production in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110:7223–7228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Volgusheva A, Kukarskikh G, Krendeleva T, Rubina A, Mamedov F (2015) Hydrogen photoproduction in green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under magnesium deprivation. R Soc Chem 5:5633–5637Google Scholar
  48. Wakamoto Y, Yasuda K (2006) Epigenetic inheritance of elongated phenotypes between generations revealed by individual-cell-based direct observation. Meas Sci Technol 17:3171–3177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White S, Anandraj A, Trois C (2014) NADPH fluorescence as an indicator of hydrogen production in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:1640–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams CR, Bees MA (2014) Mechanistic modeling of sulfur-deprived photosynthesis and hydrogen production in suspensions of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:320–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Yildiz FH, Davies JP, Grossman AR (1994) Characterization of sulfate transport in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii during sulfur-limited and sulfur-sufficient growth. Plant Physiol 104:981–987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang D, Vassiliadis VS (2015) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii metabolic pathway analysis for biohydrogen production under non-steady-state operation. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:10593–10605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takafumi Yagi
    • 1
  • Kyohei Yamashita
    • 1
  • Norihide Okada
    • 1
  • Takumi Isono
    • 1
  • Daisuke Momose
    • 1
  • Shigeru Mineki
    • 2
  • Eiji Tokunaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceTokyo University of ScienceTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Applied Biological Science, Faculty of Science and TechnologyTokyo University of ScienceNoda-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations