Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 128, Issue 4, pp 595–611 | Cite as

Interspecific variation in functional traits of oak seedlings (Quercus ilex, Quercus trojana, Quercus virgiliana) grown under artificial drought and fire conditions

  • D. Chiatante
  • R. Tognetti
  • G. S. Scippa
  • T. Congiu
  • B. Baesso
  • M. Terzaghi
  • A. MontagnoliEmail author
Regular Paper

Abstract

To face summer drought and wildfire in Mediterranean-type ecosystems, plants adopt different strategies that involve considerable rearrangements of biomass allocation and physiological activity. This paper analyses morphological and physiological traits in seedlings of three oak species (Quercus ilex, Quercus trojana and Quercus virgiliana) co-occurring under natural conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate species-specific characteristics and the response of these oak seedlings to drought stress and fire treatment. Seedlings were kept in a growth chamber that mimicked natural environmental conditions. All three species showed a good degree of tolerance to drought and fire treatments. Differences in specific biomass allocation patterns and physiological traits resulted in phenotypic differences between species. In Q. ilex, drought tolerance depended upon adjustment of the allocation pattern. Q. trojana seedlings undergoing mild to severe drought presented a higher photosystem II (PSII) efficiency than control seedlings. Moreover, Q. trojana showed a very large root system, which corresponded to higher soil area exploitation, and bigger leaf midrib vascular bundles than the other two species. Morphological and physiological performances indicated Q. trojana as the most tolerant to drought and fire. These characteristics contribute to a high recruitment potential of Q. trojana seedlings, which might be the reason for the dominance of this species under natural conditions. Drought increase as a result of climate change is expected to favour Q. trojana, leading to an increase in its spatial distribution.

Keywords

Quercus Biomass allocation pattern Phenotype 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants from the MIUR (PRIN 2008 n. 223), the University of Insubria (FAR) and the EC FP7 Project ZEPHYR-308313. We are grateful to Dr. Andrea Buzzi for helping with morphological and physiological measurements and to Dr. Dario Sacco (Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin) for soil analysis. Authors acknowledge Marianne Louise van Buuren for revisiting the text. The authors are also in debt to the Municipality of Martina Franca (TA, Italy).

References

  1. Acherar M, Rambal S (1992) Comparative water relations of four Mediterranean oak species. Vegetatio 99–100:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams WW, Winter K, Schreiber U, Scramel P (1990) Photosynthesis and chlorophyll characteristics in relation to changes in pigment and element composition of leaves of Platanus occidentalis L. during autumnal leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 93:1184–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adejare FB, Umebese CE (2008) Water stress induces cultivar dependent changes in stomatal complex, yield and osmotic adjustments in Glycine max L. Intern J Agric Res 3:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagnouls F, Gaussen H (1953) Saison sèche et indice xérothermique. Bull Soc His Nat Toulouse 88:193–239Google Scholar
  5. Baldocchi D, Ma S, Rambal S, Misson L, Ourcival JM, Limousin JM, Pereira JS, Papale D (2010) On the differential advantages of evergreenness and deciduousness in Mediterranean oak woodlands: a flux perspective. Ecol Appl 20:1583–1597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begni G, Darras S, Hoepffner M, Pesin E, Tourre Y (2001) The present status of knowledge on global climatic change; its regional aspects and impacts in the Mediterranean region. A scientific and strategic report to Blue Plan. Medias France Groupement pour le développement de la recherche sur l’environnement global notamment dans le bassin Méditerranéen et l’Afrique subtropicale. Toulouse, France, 7 December 2001Google Scholar
  7. Besson CK, Lobo-do-Vale R, Rodrigues ML, Almeida P, Herd A, Grant OM, David TS, Schmidt M, Otieno D, Keenan TF, Gouveia C, Mériaux C, Chaves MM, Pereira JS (2014) Cork oak physiological responses to manipulated water availability in a Mediterranean woodland. Agric For Meteorol 184:230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bianco P, Brullo S, Minissale P, Signorello P, Spampinato G (1998) Considerazioni fitosociologiche sui boschi a Quercus trojanae Webb della Puglia (Italia Meridionale). Studia Geobotanica 16:33–38Google Scholar
  9. Centritto M, Brilli F, Fodale R, Loreto F (2011) Different sensitivity of isoprene emission, respiration, and photosynthesis to high temperature coupled with drought stress in black poplar (Populus nigra) saplings. Tree Physiol 31:275–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapin FS, Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1990) The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charles-Edwards DA (1984) On the ordered development of plants. I. An hypothesis. Ann Bot 53:699–707Google Scholar
  12. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89:907–916PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiatante D, Di Iorio A, Scippa GS (2005) Root responses of Quercus ilex L. seedlings to drought and fire. Plant Biosyst 139:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman JS, McConnaughay KDM, Ackerly DD (1994) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trend Ecol Evol 9:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Comas LH, Becker SR, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig D (2013) Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front Plant Sci 4:442PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Congiu T, Schembri L, Tozzi M, Guasti L, Maio RC, Cosentino M, Marino F (2010) Scanning electron microscopy examination of endothelium morphology in human carotid plaques. Micron 41:532–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cormic G (1994) Drought stress and high light effects on leaf photosynthesis. In: Baker NR, Boyer JR (eds) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: from molecular mechanisms to the field. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 297–313Google Scholar
  19. De Luis M, Gonzalez-Hidalgo JC, Raventos J (2003) Effects of fire and torrential rainfall on erosion in a Mediterranean gorse community. Land Degrad Develop 14:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Iorio A, Montagnoli A, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2011) Fine root growth of Quercus pubescens seedlings after drought stress and fire disturbance. Environ Exp Bot 74:272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreesen FE, De Boecka HJ, Janssensa IA, Nijs I (2012) Summer heat and drought extremes trigger unexpected changes in productivity of a temperate annual/biannual plant community. Environ Exp Bot 79:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Epron D, Dreyer E, Breda N (1992) Photosynthesis of oak trees (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl.) during drought stress under field conditions: diurnal course of net CO2 assimilation and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II. Plant Cell Environ 15:809–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faria T, Silvério D, Breia E, Cabral R, Abadia A, Abadia J, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (1998) Differences in the response of carbon assimilation to summer stress (water deficits, high light and temperature) in four Mediterranean tree species. Physiol Plant 102:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flexas J, Medrano H (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89:183–189PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fortini P, Viscosi V, Laiuro L, Fineschi S, Vendramin GG (2009) Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of the subgenus Quercus Oerst (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst 143:543–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franks PJ, Drake PL, Froend RH (2007) Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Plant Cell Environ 30:19–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gedroc JJ, Mcconnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1996) Plasticity in root⁄shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Funct Ecol 10:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Glob Planet Change 63:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gratani L (2014) Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Adv Bot 2014:1–7, Art ID 208747. doi: 10.1155/2014/208747. Accessed Jan 2015
  30. Hayes AF, Matthes J (2009) Computational procedure for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behav Res Meth 41:924–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilbert DW, Canadell J (1996) Biomass partitioning and resource allocation of plants from Mediterranean-type ecosystems: possible responses to elevated atmospheric CO2. In: Moreno JM, Oechel WC (eds) Global change and Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Ecological studies 117, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, pp 76–101Google Scholar
  32. Hungate BA, Day FP, Dijkstra P, Duval BD, Hinkle CR, Langley JA, Megonigal JP, Stiling PM, Johnon DW, Drake BG (2003) Fire, hurricane and carbon dioxide: effects on net primary production of a subtropical woodland. New Phytol 200:767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Iwasa Y, Roughgarden J (1984) Shoot⁄root balance of plants: optimal growth of a system with many vegetative organs. Theor Pop Biol 25:78–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson RB, Manwaring JH, Caldwell MM (1990) Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment. Nature 344:58–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson PO, Neyman J (1936) Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Stat Res Memoirs 1:57–93Google Scholar
  36. Kuster TM, Dobbertin M, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Schaub M, Arend M (2014) A phenological timetable of oak growth under experimental drought and air warming. PLoS One 9:e89724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089724 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladjal M, Epron D, Ducrey M (2000) Effect of water deficit preconditioning on thermotolerance of photosystem II and susceptibility of photosynthesis to heat stress in cedar seedlings. Tree Physiol 20:1235–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Limousin JM, Rambal S, Ourcival JM, Rocheteau A, Joffre R, Rodriguez-Cortina R (2009) Long-term transpiration change with rainfall decline in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest. Global Change Biol 15:2163–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu F, Stutzel H (2002) Leaf expansion, stomatal conductance, and transpiration of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in response to soil drying. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 127:878–883Google Scholar
  40. Lloret F, Peñuelas J, Ogaya R (2004) Establishment of co-existing Mediterranean tree species under a varying soil moisture regime. J Veg Sci 15:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Margolis HA, Brand DG (1990) An ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment. Can J For Res 20:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martínez-Vilalta J, Piñol J (2002) Drought-induced mortality and hydraulic architecture in pine populations of the NE Iberian Peninsula. For Ecol Manage 161:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matías L, Quero JL, Zamora R, Castro J (2012) Evidence for plant traits driving specific drought resistance. A community field experiment. Environ Exp Bot 81:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89:895–905PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Di Iorio A, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2012) Fine-root morphological and growth traits in a Turkey-oak stand in relation to seasonal changes in soil moisture in the southern Apennines, Italy. Ecol Res 27:725–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montagnoli A, Di Iorio A, Terzaghi M, Trupiano D, Scippa GS, Chiatante D (2014) Influence of soil temperature and water content on fine-root seasonal growth of European beech natural forest in Southern Alps. Eur J For Res, Italy. doi: 10.1007/s10342-014-0814-6 Google Scholar
  47. Moya D, Espelta JM, Lopez-Serrano FR, Eugenio M, De Las Heras J (2008) Natural post-fire dynamics and serotiny in 10-year-old Pinus halepensis Mill. stands along a geographic gradient. Int J Wildland Fire 17:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nardini A, Tyree MT (1999) Root and shoot hydraulic conductance of seven Quercus species. Ann For Sci 56:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neilson RP, Wullstein LH (1985) Comparative drought physiology and biogeography of Quercus-Gambelii and Quercus-Turbinella in relation to seedling drought response and atmospheric flow structure. Am Midl Nat 114:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ozturk M, Dogan Y, Sakcali S, Doulis A, Karam F (2010) Ecophysiological responses of some maquis (Ceratonia siliqua L., Olea oleaster Hoffm. and Link, Pistacia lentiscus and Quercus coccifera L.) plant species to drought in the east Mediterranean ecosystem. J Environ Biol 31:233–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Comas P (2002) Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region. Global Change Biol 8:531–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pereira JS, David JS, David TS, Caldeira MC, Chaves MM (2004) Carbon and water fluxes in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: constraints and adaptations. Prog Bot 65:467–498Google Scholar
  53. Pereira JS, Mateus JA, Aires LM (2007) Net ecosystem carbon exchange in three contrasting Mediterranean ecosystems. The effect of drought. Biogeosciences 4:791–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Piñol J, Terradas J, Lloret F (1998) Climate warming, wildfire hazard, and wildfire occurrence in coastal eastern Spain. Clim Change 38:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poorter H, Sack L (2012) Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants. Front Plant Sci 3:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Qaderi MM, Kurepin LV, Reid DM (2012) Effects of temperature and watering regime on growth, gas exchange and abscisic acid content of canola (Brassica napus) seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 75:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reynolds JF, Thornley JH (1982) A shoot-root partitioning model. Ann Bot 49:585–597Google Scholar
  59. Sabaté S, Gracia CA, Sánchez A (2002) Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica forests in the Mediterranean region. For Ecol Manage 162:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanchez-Humanes B, Espelta JM (2011) Increased drought reduces acorn production in Quercus ilex coppices: thinning mitigates this effect but only in the short term. Forestry 84:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Oswald H, Piussi P, Kalliopi R (2000) Forests of the Mediterranean region: gaps in knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manage 132:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas FM, Gausling T (2000) Morphological and physiological responses of oak seedlings (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) to moderate drought. Ann For Sci 57:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tognetti R, Longobucco A, Raschi A (1998) Vulnerability of xylem to embolism in relation to plant hydraulic resistance in co-occurring Quercus pubescens and Quercus ilex of a Mediterranean coppice stand in central Italy. New Phytol 139:437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tognetti R, Longobucco A, Raschi A (1999) Seasonal embolism and xylem vulnerability in deciduous and evergreen Mediterranean trees influenced by proximity to a carbon dioxide spring. Tree Physiol 19:271–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tognetti R, Raschi A, Jones MB (2000) Seasonal patterns of tissue water relations in three Mediterranean shrubs co-occurring at a natural CO2 spring. Plant Cell Environ 23:1341–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Valladares F, Pearcy RW (1997) Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutifolia. Plant Cell Environ 20:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vaz M, Pereira JS, Gazarini LC, David TS, David JS, Rodrigues A, Maroco J, Chaves MM (2010) Drought-induced photosynthetic inhibition and autumn recovery in two Mediterranean oak species (Quercus ilex and Quercus suber). Tree Physiol 30:946–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vilagrosa A, Bellot J, Vallejo VR, Gil-Pelegrin E (2003) Cavitation, stomatal conductance, and leaf dieback in seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean shrubs during an intense drought. J Exp Bot 54:2015–2024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vilagrosa A, Chirino E, Peguero JJ, Barigah TS, Cochard H, Gil-Pelegrin E (2012) Xylem cavitation and embolism in plants living in water-limited ecosystems. In: Aroca R (ed) Plant responses to drought stress. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 63–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xoplaki E, Gonzalez-Rouco ÆJF, Luterbacher ÆJ, Wanner H (2004) Wet season Mediterranean precipitation variability: influence of large-scale dynamics and trends. Clim Dyn 23:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmerman MH, Brown CL (1977) Trees structure and function. Springer-Verlag, New York 336 p Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Chiatante
    • 1
  • R. Tognetti
    • 2
    • 4
  • G. S. Scippa
    • 2
  • T. Congiu
    • 3
  • B. Baesso
    • 1
  • M. Terzaghi
    • 1
  • A. Montagnoli
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology and Life ScienceUniversity of InsubriaVareseItaly
  2. 2.Department of Biosciences and TerritoryUniversity of MolisePescheItaly
  3. 3.Department of Surgical and Morphological SciencesUniversity of InsubriaVareseItaly
  4. 4.The EFI Project Centre on Mountain Forests (MOUNTFOR)San Michele all’AdigeItaly

Personalised recommendations