Comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of the Ruppia maritima complex focusing on taxa from the Mediterranean
- 476 Downloads
Recent molecular phylogenetic studies reported high diversity of Ruppia species in the Mediterranean. Multiple taxa, including apparent endemics, are known from that region, however, they have thus far not been exposed to phylogenetic analyses aimed at studying their relationships to taxa from other parts of the world. Here we present a comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of the R. maritima complex using data sets composed of DNA sequences of the plastid genome, the multi-copy nuclear ITS region, and the low-copy nuclear phyB gene with a primary focus on the Mediterranean representatives of the complex. As a result, a new lineage, “Drepanensis”, was identified as the seventh entity of the complex. This lineage is endemic to the Mediterranean. The accessions included in the former “Tetraploid” entity were reclassified into two entities: an Asia–Australia–Europe disjunct “Tetraploid_α” with a paternal “Diploid” origin, and a European “Tetraploid_γ” originating from a maternal “Drepanensis” lineage. Another entity, “Tetraploid_β”, is likely to have been originated as a result of chloroplast capture through backcrossing hybridization between paternal “Tetraploid_α” and maternal “Tetraploid_γ”. Additional discovery of multiple tetraploidizations as well as hybridization and chloroplast capture at the tetraploid level indicated that hybridization has been a significant factor in the diversification of Ruppia.
KeywordsChloroplast capture Hybridization ITS PhyB Plastid DNA Ruppia
The authors thank Dr. P. Garcia-Murillo (Seville, Spain), Dr. S. Sciandrello (Sicily, Italy), Mr. S. Mifsud (Malta), Dr. H. Freitag (Kassel, Germany), Dr. S. R. Yadav (Kolhapur, India), Dr. J. J. Orth (Virginia, USA), Dr. H. J. Cho (Mississippi, USA), and Dr. S. W. L. Jacobs (Sydney, Australia) for their help with field research and Drs. D. Potter (California, USA) and P. B. Pelser (Christchurch, NZ) for revising the draft version of this manuscript.
- Castroviejo S (1983) Números cromosomáticos de plantas occidentales, 211–222. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 39:525–531 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- Cirujano S (1982) Aportaciones a la flora de los saladares castellanos. Anales Jard Bot Madrid 39:167–173 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- Cirujano S (1986) El género Ruppia L. (Potamogetonaceae) en la mancha (España). Bol Soc Brot sér. 2, 59: 293–303 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
- Jacobs SWL, Brock MA (2011) Ruppiaceae. In: Wilson A (ed) Flora of Australia, volume 39, Alismatales to Arales. ABRS/CISRO, Melbourne, pp 95–98Google Scholar
- Marchioni-Ortu A (1982) Numeri cromosomici per la Flora Italiana: 873–876. Inf Bot Ital 14:234–237 (in Italy)Google Scholar
- Nylander JAA (2002) MrModeltest v.1.0. Program distributed by the author. Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University, Uppsala. http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html
- Setchell WA (1946) The genus Ruppia L. Proc Calif Acad Sci 25:469–478Google Scholar
- Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
- Triest L, Symoens JJ (1991) Isozymes in populations of the submerged halophyte Ruppia (Ruppiaceae). Op Bot Belg 4:117–134Google Scholar
- Zhao LC, Wu ZY (2008) A review of the taxonomy and evolution of Ruppia. J Syst Evol 46:467–478Google Scholar