Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 147–154 | Cite as

Genotypic variation in drought stress response and subsequent recovery of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Valya Vassileva
  • Constant Signarbieux
  • Iwona Anders
  • Urs Feller
Regular Paper

Abstract

Three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes, Sadovo, Katya and Prelom, with different tolerance to drought were comparatively evaluated in terms of leaf respiratory responses to progressing dehydration and consecutive rewatering. Under drought stress, the respiration of all varieties gradually decreased, as the drought-tolerant Katya showed the most pronounced decline at earlier stages of dehydration. When water stress intensified, this genotype gave relatively stable respiration rates compared with the drought-sensitive varieties. Additionally, dehydrated Katya leaves displayed lower stomatal conductance and higher photosynthesis values, which resulted in greater water use efficiency during the dehydration period. Combination of drought stress and short-term changes in leaf temperature also induced genotype-specific response that differed from the response to drought only. Over the whole temperature range, the leaves of Katya exposed to dehydration for 14 days, showed higher respiration rates compared to the drought-sensitive varieties. The sensitive varieties maintained higher respiration rates under control conditions and mild dehydration, and very low rates under severe drought. In Katya, respiration and photosynthesis were fully restored from the stress within the first day of rewatering. The drought-sensitive genotypes displayed a considerably slower recovering capacity. The results are discussed in terms of possible physiological mechanisms underlying plant tolerance to drought.

Keywords

Drought tolerance Leaf respiration Stomatal conductance Wheat variety 

Abbreviations

Q10

Change in respiration during a 10°C increase in temperature

WUE

Water use efficiency

References

  1. Atkin OK, Macherel D (2009) The crucial role of plant mitochondria in orchestrating drought tolerance. Ann Bot 103:581–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin OK, Holly C, Ball MC (2000) Acclimation of snow gum (Eucalyptus pauciflora) leaf respiration to seasonal and diurnal variations in temperature: the importance of changes in the capacity and temperature sensitivity of respiration. Plant Cell Environ 23:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruhn D, Schortemeyer M, Edwards EJ, Egerton JJG, Hocart CH, Evans JR, Ball MC (2008) The apparent temperature response of leaf respiration depends on the timescale of measurements: a study of two cold climate species. Plant Biol 10:185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunce JA (2007) Direct and acclimatory responses of dark respiration and translocation to temperature. Ann Bot 100:67–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2002) Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci 42:122–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (2000) Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Plant Biol 3:117–124Google Scholar
  7. Demirevska K, Simova-Stoilova L, Vassileva V, Feller U (2008) Rubisco and some chaperone protein responses to water stress and rewatering at early seedling growth of drought sensitive and tolerant wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regul 56:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erdei L, Tari I, Csiszár J, Pécsváradi A, Horváth F, Szabó M, Ördög M, Cseuz L, Zhiponova M, Szilák L, Györgyey J (2002) Osmotic stress responses of wheat species and cultivars differing in drought tolerance: some interesting genes (advices for gene hunting). Acta Biol Szeged 46:63–65Google Scholar
  9. Flexas J, Medrano H (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plant: stomatal and non-stomatal limitation revisited. Ann Bot 89:183–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004) Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol 6:269–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Flexas J, Galmes J, Ribas-Carbo M, Medrano H (2005) The effects of water stress on plant respiration. In: Lambers H, Ribas-Carbo M (eds) Plant respiration: from cell to ecosystem. Advances in photosynthesis and respiration series, vol 18/6. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 85–94Google Scholar
  12. Flexas J, Bota J, Galmes J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M (2006) Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiol Plant 127:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flexas J, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmes J, Kaldenhoff R, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M (2007) Rapid variations of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30:1284–1298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Galmes J, Ribas-Carbo M, Medrano H, Flexas J (2007) Response of leaf respiration to water stress in Mediterranean species with different growth forms. J Arid Environ 68:206–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hubick KT, Farquhar GD, Shorter R (1986) Correlation between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in diverse peanut (Arachis) germplasm. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:803–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones HG (1974) Assessment of stomata control of plant water status. New Phytol 73:851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirschbaum MUF (1988) Recovery of photosynthesis from water stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora—a process in two stages. Plant Cell Environ 11:685–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawlor DW, Cornic G (2002) Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:275–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mattana M, Biazzi E, Consonni R, Locatelli F, Vannini C, Provera S, Coraggio I (2005) Overexpression of Osmyb4 enhances compatible solute accumulation and increases stress tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 125:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pou A, Flexas J, Alsina Mdel M, Bota J, Carambula C, de Herralde F, Galmés J, Lovisolo C, Jiménez M, Ribas-Carbó M, Rusjan D, Secchi F, Tomàs M, Zsófi Z, Medrano H (2008) Adjustments of water use efficiency by stomatal regulation during drought and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris). Physiol Plant 134:313–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Reinhold T, Alawady A, Grimm B, Beran KC, Jahns P, Conrath U, Bauer J, Reiser J, Melzer M, Jeblick W, Neuhaus HE (2007) Nocturnal ATP import into chloroplasts as a novel control element in chlorophyll biosynthesis is critical to prevent photooxidative damage in Arabidopsis. Plant J 50:795–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribas-Carbo M, Taylor NL, Giles L, Busquets S, Finnegan PM, Day DA, Lambers H, Medrano H, Berry JA, Flexas J (2005) Effects of water stress on respiration in soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 139:466–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Mittler R (2002) The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol 130:1143–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Simova-Stoilova L, Vassileva V, Petrova T, Tsenov N, Demirevska K, Feller U (2006) Proteolytic activity in wheat leaves during drought stress and recovery. Gen Appl Plant Physiol Spec Issue 91–100Google Scholar
  25. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. Teare ID, Kanemasu ET, Powers WL, Jacobs HS (1973) Water-use efficiency and its relation to crop canopy area, stomatal regulation, and root distribution. Agron J 65:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van den Boogaard R, de Boer M, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H (1996) Relative growth rate, biomass allocation pattern and water use efficiency of three wheat cultivars during early ontogeny as dependent on water availability. Physiol Plant 98:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vassileva V, Simova-Stoilova L, Demirevska K, Feller U (2009) Variety-specific response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaf mitochondria to drought stress. J Plant Res 122:445–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitehead D, Griffin KL, Turnbull MH, Tissue DT, Engel VC, Schuster WSF, Brown KJ, Walcroft AS (2004) Response of total night-time respiration to differences in total daily photosynthesis for leaves in a Quercus rubra L. canopy: implications for modeling canopy CO2 exchange. Glob Chang Biol 10:925–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams JHH, Farrar JF (1990) Control of barley root respiration. Physiol Plant 79:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valya Vassileva
    • 1
  • Constant Signarbieux
    • 2
  • Iwona Anders
    • 2
  • Urs Feller
    • 2
  1. 1.Acad. M. Popov Institute of Plant PhysiologyBulgarian Academy of Sciences, Academik Georgi BonchevSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Institute of Plant Sciences and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (OCCR)University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations