Skip to main content
Log in

Osmotic water permeability of plasma and vacuolar membranes in protoplasts II. Theoretical basis

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water permeability of the plasma membrane (PM) and the vacuolar membrane (VM) is important for intracellular and transcellular water movement in plants, because mature plant cells have large central vacuoles. We have developed a new method for measuring the osmotic water permeability of the PM and VM (P f1 and P f2, respectively) in individual plant cells. Here, the theoretical basis and procedure of the method are discussed. Protoplasts isolated from higher plant tissues are used to measure P f1 and P f2. Because of the semi-permeability (selective permeability) of cellular membranes, protoplasts swell or shrink under hypotonic or hypertonic conditions. A theoretical three-compartment model is presented for simulating time-dependent volume changes in the vacuolar and cytoplasmic spaces in a protoplast during osmotic excursions. The model describes the theoretical relationships between P f1, P f2 and the bulk osmotic water permeability of protoplasts (P f(bulk)). The procedure for measuring the osmotic water permeability is: (1) P f(bulk) is calculated from the time when half of the total change in protoplast volume is completed, by assuming that the protoplast has a single barrier to water movement across it (two-compartment model); (2) P f2 of vacuoles isolated from protoplasts is obtained in the same manner; and (3) P f1 is determined from P f(bulk) and P f2 according to the three-compartment model. The theoretical relationship between P fl (m s−1) and L Pl (hydraulic conductivity, l=1, 2) (m s−1 Pa−1) is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry PH, Diamond JM (1984) Effects of unstirred layers on membrane phenomena. Physiol Rev 64:763–872

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dainty J (1963) Water relations of plant cells. Adv in Bot Res 1: 279–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbeau P, Guclu J, Ripoche P, Maurel C (1999) Aquaporin Nt-TIPa can account for the high permeability of tobacco cell vacuolar membrane to small neutral solutes. Plant J 18:577–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Heeswijk MPE, van Os CH (1986) Osmotic water permeabilities of brush border and basolateral membrane vesicles from rat renal cortex and small intestine. J Membr Biol 92:183–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henzler T, Steudle E (2000) Transport and metabolic degradation of hydrogen peroxide in Chara corallina: model calculations and measurements with the pressure probe suggest transport of H2O2 across water channels. J Exp Bot 51: 2053–2066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plant and soils. Academic, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurel C (1997) Aquaporins and water permeability of plant membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:399–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurel C, Tacnet F, Guclu J, Guern J, Ripoche P (1997) Purified vesicles of tobacco cell vacuolar and plasma membranes exhibit dramatically different water permeability and water channel activity. Proc of Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7103–7108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurel C, Javot H, Lauvergeat V, Gerbeau P, Tournaire C, Santoni V, Heyes J (2002) Molecular Physiology of aquaporins in plants. Int Rev Cytol 215:105–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morillon R, Lassalles JP (1999) Osmotic water permeability of isolated vacuoles. Planta 210:80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morillon R, Lassalles JP (2002) Water deficit during root development: Effects on the growth of roots and osmotic water permeability of isolated root protoplasts. Planta 214:392–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moshelion M, Moran N, Chaumont F (2004) Dynamic changes in the osmotic water permeability of protoplast plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 135:2301–2317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murai-Hatano M, Kuwagata T (2007) Osmotic water permeability of plasma and vacuolar membranes in protoplasts I. High osmotic water permeability in radish (Raphanus sativus) root cells as measured by a new method. J Plant Res. DOI 10.1007/s10265-006-0035-2

  • Niemietz CM, Tyerman SD (1997) Characterization of water channels in wheat root membrane vesicles. Plant Physiol 115:561–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramahaleo T, Morillon R, Alexandre J, Lassalles JP (1999) Osmotic water permeability of isolated protoplasts: modifications during development. Plant Physiol 119:885–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon AK (1989) Water channels across the red blood cell and other biological membranes. In: Fleicsher S, Fleicsher B (eds) Methods Enzymol, vol 173. Academic, San Diego, pp 192–222

  • Suga S, Murai M, Kuwagata T, Maeshima M (2003) Difference in aquaporin levels among cell types of radish and measurement of osmotic water permeability of individual protoplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 44:277–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler S, Zimmermann U (1985a) Compartment analysis of plant cells by means of turgor pressure relation: I. Theoretical considerations. J Membr Biol 85:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler S, Zimmermann U (1985b) Compartment analysis of plant cells by means of turgor pressure relation: II. Experimental results on Chara corallina. J Membr Biol 85:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WH, Tyerman SD (1999) Inhibition of water channels by HgCl2 in intact wheat root cells. Plant Physiol 120: 849–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr Joe Wolfe of the University of New South Wales, Sydney, for valuable discussions and useful advice, and to anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology of Japan (nos. 16780181 and 18380151).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuneo Kuwagata.

Additional information

Tsuneo Kuwagata and Mari Murai-Hatano contributed equally to the paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix

Appendix

List of main symbols

C 00 :

concentration of the external solution (mol m−3) (first stage)

C 0+ :

concentration of the external solution (mol m−3) (second and third stages)

C 1 :

solute concentration in the cytoplasmic space (mol m−3)

C 2 :

solute concentration in the vacuolar space (mol m−3)

C l0 :

C l for the first stage (l=1, 2)

C l+ :

C l for the third stage (l=1, 2)

f :

=P f2/P f1

f 0 :

=P f20/P f10

J w1 :

water inflow flux through the plasma membrane (PM)

J w2 :

water inflow flux through the vacuolar membrane (VM)

L P1 :

hydraulic conductivity of the PM

L P2 :

hydraulic conductivity of the VM

L P(bulk) :

bulk hydraulic conductivity of the protoplast

P f1 :

osmotic water permeability of the PM

P f2 :

osmotic water permeability of the VM

P fl0 :

P fl when S l =S l0 (l=1, 2, for constant S×P f )

P f(sum) :

total osmotic water permeability of the PM and the VM (=R P(sum) −1)

P f(sum0) :

=R P(sum0) −1 (same as P f(sum) at t=0, for constant S×P f )

P f(sum0.5) :

P f(sum) at t=t 0.5 for the two-compartment model for constant S×P f

P f(sum0.25) :

P f(sum) at t=t 0.25 for the two-compartment model for constant S×P f

P f(bulk) :

bulk osmotic water permeability of protoplast

P f(bulk0) :

P f(bulk) at t=0 (for constant S×P f )

R :

gas constant (8.31451 J K−1 mol−1)

R P1 :

osmotic resistance of the PM (=P −1 f1 )

R P2 :

osmotic resistance of the VM (=P −1 f2 )

R Pl0 :

R Pl when S l =S l0 (l=1, 2, for constant S×P f )

R P(sum) :

sum of the osmotic resistance of the PM and the VM (=R P1+R P2)

R P(sum0) :

=R P10+R P20 (for constant S×P f )

R P(bulk) :

bulk osmotic resistance of the protoplast (=P f(bulk) −1)

R P(bulk0) :

=P f(bulk0) −1

r 1 :

radius of the protoplast

r 2 :

radius of the vacuole

r l0 :

r l for the first stage (l=1, 2)

r l* :

=r l /r l0 (l=1, 2)

r 1*0.5 :

r 1* at t=t 0.5

S 1 :

surface area of the PM

S 2 :

surface area of the VM

S l0 :

S l for the first stage (l=1, 2)

T :

temperature (K)

t :

time

t 0.5 :

half-time (defined as the time when half of the total change in protoplast volume was completed)

t 0.25 :

one-quarter time (defined as the time when one-quarter of the total change in protoplast volume was completed)

\(t_{0.5}^{({\rm obs})}\) :

t 0.5 measured from the swelling/shrinking of the protoplast

\(t_{0.5}^{({\rm 2CM})}\) :

t 0.5 predicted by use of the two-compartment model

t * :

dimensionless time (=t/τ, τr 10/(V w C 1+ P f1)) (used mainly for the three-compartment model for constant P f )

\(t_{{\rm s*}}\) :

dimensionless time (=t/τ s, τ sr 10/(V w C 1+ P f10)) (used mainly for the three-compartment model for constant S×P f )

\(t_{{*}}^\prime\) :

dimensionless time (=t/τ′, τ′≡r 10/(V w C 1+ P f(sum))) (used for the two-compartment model for constant P f )

\(t_{{\rm s*}}^\prime\) :

dimensionless time \((=t/\tau_{\rm s}^{\prime}, \; \tau_{\rm s}^{\prime}\equiv r_{10}/(V_{\rm W}C_{1+}P_{f(\rm sum0)}))\) (used for the two-compartment model for constant S×P f )

\(t_{*0.5}^\prime\) :

dimensionless half-time for \(t_{{*}}^\prime\)

\(t_{{\rm s*0.5}}^\prime\) :

dimensionless half-time for \(t_{{\rm s*}}^\prime\)

\(t_{*0.5}^{(3{\rm CM})}\) :

dimensionless half-times calculated by use of the three-compartment model

\(t_{*0.5}^{(2{\rm CM})}\) :

dimensionless half-times calculated by use of the two-compartment model

V 1 :

volume of the protoplast

V 2 :

volume of the vacuole

V l0 :

V l for the first stage (l=1, 2)

V l+ :

V l for the third stage (l=1, 2)

V l* :

=V l /V l0 (l=1, 2)

V 1*0.5 :

V 1* at t=t 0.5

V 1*0.25 :

V 1* at t=t 0.25

V ′′ P :

second virial coefficient for the solution in the cytoplasmic space

V ′′ T :

second virial coefficient for the solution in the vacuolar space

V s :

partial molar volume of the solute

V 1s :

V s in cytoplasmic and vacuolar spaces, assuming an ideal dilute intracellular solution

V w :

the partial molar volume of water (18.05×10−6 m3 mol−1 at 20°C)

α 0 :

=r 10/r 20

β 10 :

ratio of initial and final equilibrium volumes of the protoplast (=V 1+/V 10)

Π 00 :

osmotic pressure of the external solution (first stage)

Π 0+ :

osmotic pressure of the external solution (second and third stages)

Π 1 :

osmotic pressure in the cytoplasmic space

Π 2 :

osmotic pressure in the vacuolar space

Π l0 :

Π l for the first stage (l=1, 2)

Π l+ :

Π l for the third stage (l=1, 2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuwagata, T., Murai-Hatano, M. Osmotic water permeability of plasma and vacuolar membranes in protoplasts II. Theoretical basis. J Plant Res 120, 193–208 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-006-0037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-006-0037-0

Keywords

Navigation