The study examines the importance of intertemporal substitution in import demand considering the role of habit formation. A two-goods version of the permanent income model is used in which time-non-separability in consumers’s preferences is assumed. The model is estimated using annual data for Pakistan at disaggregated level covering the period from 1977 to 2017.
The objective of the study is to estimate elasticities of substitution along with parameters of habit formation for consumption goods at a disaggregated level.
The study employs co-integration for the estimation of parameters of elasticities of substitution and generalized method of moments (GMM) for the estimation of the parameters of habit formation from Euler equations.
The estimates of intertempral elasticity of substitution suggest that the nature of commodity group (necessity/luxury) plays an important role when consumers are making intertemporal choices. Moreover, the study finds that intratemporal elasticity of substitution is larger than intertempral elasticity of substitution in almost all cases in Pakistan, suggesting that imported and domestic goods are best described as substitutes in Edgeworth-Pareto sense. In addition, the inclusion of habit formation delivers results with plausible signs and the habit formation process seems significant for certain commodity groups including tea, beverages, tobacco products and drugs.
The study concludes that there is a possibility of crowding out effect on domestic consumption and the depreciation of local currency may improve Pakistan’s balance of trade.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The time-separable utility functions assume that current utility is a function of current consumption while time non-separable utility functions assume that current utility is function of current as well as past consumption.
The study collects 2735 estimates of IES from 169 published articles in their analysis of intertemporal substitution for 104 countries.
In 2016, out of 192 countries in the IMF, Pakistan was one of the only 9 countries, whose monetary policy framework did not fit into any type of exchange rate arrangements, studied by the IMF.
The studies estimating IES usually consider non-durable consumption goods as a proxy for aggregate consumption and exclude durables goods because of the volatility of spending on durables goods (Havranek 2015). Moreover, durable goods are more easily substituted across periods, therefore, inclusion of durables goods may lead to high estimates of IES (Thimme 2017).
Conversely, an approach that allows for non-separability between domestic and imported consumption goods (composite good) may not be an appropriate specification to adopt when modeling the behavior of domestic and imported consumption goods at the same time. If consumption of imported good is more volatile than the consumption of domestic goods, then, the estimates of IES of the whole consumption bundle (composite good) may be biased downward (Thimme 2017).
The standard classification for groups and sub-groups also includes raw materials and durable goods. However, the study has constructed new groups (i.e. drugs, paints and lighting fixtures etc.) which include only those imported items which are considered as non-durable consumer goods. The study has constructed these commodity groups (sub-groups) from more disaggregated data following Head and Ries (2001). Details of commodity groups are given in Table 5 in the appendix.
All these data sources, ASP, PSYB, CMIP, FTSP, MSB and MBS are publications of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan.
In the construction of unit value indices, the study has used average quantity of each imported commodity for the sample period as the base year quantity.
Bhutto government devalued rupee against US dollar in May, 1972 from Rs 4.76 to Rs 9.90. It was in 1973, when Pakistan enjoyed trade surplus for the last time.
The figures reported in this sub-section are based on the data taken from Pakistan Economic Surveys.
Although, Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KPSS) unit root test is available, however, it is argued that researchers should be cautious about the properties of the KPSS test while focusing consumption data because there is higher probability that KPSS test will reject null-hypothesis for consumption data, despite the fact that it can be defined as a mean reverting time-series process (Jönsson 2011).
The estimates of β2 and β3 are theoretically restricted to non-negative values, negative estimates are theoretically inadmissible as they violate standard preference properties. Therefore, negative estimates are usually not included in the discussion (Havranek et al. 2015).
It is a well-established empirical regularity and explained by Thimme (2017) that consumption in developing countries is related to subsistence considerations. Similarly, Ogaki et al. (1996) discussed that first subsistence level of consumption will be achieved in developing countries, and then the portion of the left-over budget will be used for other items. This argument allow us to consider that if consumers are purchasing commodities like floor covering or lighting fixtures, then it is based on the portion of their budget left after subsistence has been satisfied. Therefore, it can be argued that these commodities are consumed by relatively high income consumers.
However, the study has included only those estimates of IES in the second step of analysis; which are theoretically acceptable following Nishiyama (2005).
Hall (1988) estimating IES for consumption goods argues that estimates of IES are unlikely to be much above 0.1 for the UK.
Ahmad E, Khan FN (2002) Short run dynamics in purchasing power parity: a case of selected Asian countries. Middle East Bus Econ Rev 14(2):28–40
Amano R, Wirjanto T (1996) Intertemporal substitution, imports and permanent income model. J Int Econ 40:439–457
Amano R, Wirjanto T (1997) Intratemporal Substitution and Government Spending. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):605–609
Amano R, Ho W and Wirjanto T (1998). Intraperiod and Intertemporal Substitution in Import Demand. CREFE Working paper No. 84
Aristei D, Pieroni L (2010) Habits, Complementarities and Heterogeneity in Alcohol and Tobacco Demand: A Multivariate Dynamic Model. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 72(4):428–457
Atkeson A, Ogaki M (1996) Wealth-varying Intertemporal Elasticities of substitution: evidence from panel and aggregate data. J Monet Econ 38(3):507–534
Attanasio O, Weber G (2010) Consumption and saving: models of Intertemporal allocation and their implications for public policy. J Econ Lit 48:693–751
Auteri M, Costantini M (2010) A panel Cointegration approach to estimating substitution Elasticities in consumption. Econ Model 27:782–787
Carrasco R, Labeaga J, López-Salido J (2005) Consumption and habits: evidence from panel data. Econ J 115(500):144–165
Ceglowski J (1991) Intertemporal substitution in import demand. J Int Money Financ 10:118–130
Chen C, Chen G, Yao S (2012) Do imports crowd out domestic consumption? A comparative study of China, Japan and Korea. China Econ Rev 23:1036–1050
Clarida R (1994) Co-integration, aggregate consumption and the demand for imports: a structural econometric investigation. Am Econ Rev 84:298–308
Cooley T, Ogaki M (1991). A time series analysis of real wages, consumption, and asset returns under optimal labor contracting: a Cointegration-Euler equation approach. Rochester Center for Economic Research, working paper no. 285, Rochester, N Y
Croix D, Urbain J (1998) Intertemporal substitution in import demand and habit formation. J Appl Econ 13:589–612
Crossley T, Low H (2011) Is the elasticity of Intertemporal substitution constant? J Eur Econ Assoc 9(1):87–105
Dawood TC, Francois JN (2018) Substitution between Private and Government Consumption in African Economies. Econ Model 73(C):129–139
Duesenberry JS (1949) Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Dynan K (2000) Habit formation in consumer preferences: evidence from panel data. Am Econ Rev 90(3):391–406
Fuhrer J (2000) Habit formation in consumption and its implications for monetary-policy models. Am Econ Rev 90:367–390
Garratt A, Lee K, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2012). Global And National Macroeconometric Modelling: A long-run Structural Approach. Oxford University Press
Hall R (1978) Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence. J Polit Econ 86(6):971–987
Hall R (1988) Intertemporal substitution in consumption. J Polit Econ 96:339–357
Hamid N, Mir AS (2017) Exchange rate management and economic growth: a brewing crisis in Pakistan. Lahore J Econ 22:73–110
Handbook of Statistics on Pakistan Economy (2015) State Bank of Pakistan
Hansen B, West K (2002) Generalized method of moments and macroeconomics. J Bus Econ Stud 20(4):460–469
Hansen L (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimator. Econometrica 50:1029–1054
Haque, S., Y. Lin and K. Kotani (2016). The Intra-Temporal Substitution between Government Expenditure and Private Consumption: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2943702 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2943702
Havranek T (2015) Measuring Intertemporal substitution: the importance of method choices and selective reporting. J Eur Econ Assoc 13(6):1180–1204
Havranek T, Horvath R, Irsova Z, Rusnak M (2015) Cross-Country Heterogeneity in Intertemporal Substitution. J Int Econ 96(1):100–118
Havranek T, Rusnak M, Sokolova A (2017) Habit formation in Consumption: A Meta-analysis. Eur Econ Rev 95:142–167
Head K, Ries J (2001) Increasing returns versus National Product Differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of U.S.-Canada trade. Am Econ Rev 91(4):858–876
Houthakker H (1960) Additive preferences. Econometrica 28:244–256
International Monetary Fund (2016) IMF annual report on exchange arrangements and exchange restrictions (AREAER). Washington, D.C.
International Monetary Fund (2019) IMF country reports. Middle East and Central Asia, Dept, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of Cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on Cointegration with applications to demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(5):169–210
Jönsson K (2011) Testing Stationarity in small and medium-sized samples when disturbances are serially correlated. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 73:669–690
Jozef B, Havranek T, Irsova Z, Schwarz J (2019) The elasticity of substitution between domestic and foreign goods: a quantitative survey, ZBW Leibniz information Centre for Economics. Kiel, Hamburg http://hdl.handle.net/10419/200207
MacKinnon JG, Alfred A, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for Cointegration. J Appl Econ 14:563–577
Muellbauer J (1988) Habits, rationality and myopia in the life cycle consumption function. Annales d’ Economie et de Statistique 9:47–70
Nieh C, Ho T (2006) Does The Expansionary Government Spending Crowd Out The Private Consumption?: Cointegration Analysis In Panel Data. Q Rev Econ Finance 46(1):133–148
Nishiyama S (2005) The cross-Euler equation approach to Intertemporal substitution in import demand. J Appl Econ 20(7):841–872
Okubo M (2008) On the Intertemporal elasticity of substitution under nonhomothetic utility. J Money Credit Banking 40(5):1065–1072
Ogaki M, Reinhart C (1998) Measuring Intertemporal substitution: the role of durable goods. J Polit Econ 106:1078–1098
Ogaki M, Ostry J, Reinhart CM (1996) Saving behavior in Low- and middle-income developing countries: a comparison. IMF Staff Pap 43(1):38–71
Olekalns N, Bardsley P (1996) Rational addiction to caffeine: an analysis of coffee consumption. J Polit Econ 104(5):1100–1104
Pakistan Economic Survey (2019). Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan
Pakos M (2011) Estimating Intertemporal and Intratemporal substitutions when both income and substitution effects are present: the role of durable goods. J Bus Econ Stat 29(3):439–454
Ravn M, Schmitt-Grohe S, Uribe MM (2006) Deep habits. Rev Econ Stud 73:195–218
Thimme J (2017) Intertemporal substitution in consumption: a literature review. J Econ Surv 31(1):226–257
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, F.N., Ahmad, E. Intertemporal substitution in import demand and the role of habit formation: an application of Euler equation approach for Pakistan. Port Econ J (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-020-00186-0
- Import demand
- Elasticity of substitution
- Time non-separable preferences
- Euler equation
- Habit formation