Advertisement

Portfolio selection in euro area with CAPM and Lower Partial Moments models

  • José Soares da FonsecaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This article selects portfolios using estimates given by CAPM and three Lower Partial Moments models (LPM). The CAPM assumption about investors’ behaviour towards risk is that they are equally concerned with upside and downside risk. The LPM models, however, are based on the assumption that investors’ utility functions weight downside risk more heavily than upside risk. The major difference between LPM models is their definition of upside and downside risk. The asset pricing models estimations and the corresponding portfolio selection were conducted on several euro area domestic stock indexes and the European Monetary Union stock market index (EMU). A pairwise comparison of portfolio performance is conducted through Sharpe ratios calculated separately for upside and downside market conditions. The results of this comparative analysis of different pricing models provide evidence that CAPM and one LPM model offer better protection against adverse market conditions than the other two LPM models studied.

Keywords

Downside risk Efficient portfolios CAPM Lower partial moments Sharpe ratios upside risk 

JEL Classification

F36 G11 G15 

Notes

Supplementary material

10258_2019_153_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 35.2 kb)
10258_2019_153_MOESM2_ESM.docx (201 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 200 kb)

References

  1. Bawa VS, Lindenberg EB (1977) Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mean Lower Partial Moment Framework. J Financ Econ 5(2):189–200Google Scholar
  2. Breusch TS (1978) Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Aust Econ Pap 17(31):334–355Google Scholar
  3. Chow KV, Lai C (2015) Conditional sharpe ratios. Financ Res Lett 12:117–133Google Scholar
  4. Cumova D, Nawrocki D (2014) Portfolio optimization in an upside potential and downside risk framework. J Econ Bus 71:68–89Google Scholar
  5. Elton E, Gruber M, Padberg M (1976) Simple criteria for optimal portfolio selection. J Financ 31(5):1341–1357Google Scholar
  6. Elton E, Gruber M, Padberg M (1978) Simple criteria for optimal portfolio selection: tracing out the efficient frontier. J Financ 33(1):296–302Google Scholar
  7. Estrada J (2002) Systematic risk in emerging markets. The D-CAPM. Emerg Mark Rev 3(4):365–379Google Scholar
  8. French K e, Poterba J (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Am Econ Rev 81(2):222–226Google Scholar
  9. Galagedera D (2007) An alternative perspective on the relationship between downside beta and CAPM beta. Emerg Mark Rev 8(1):4–19Google Scholar
  10. Godfrey LG (1978) Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46(8):1293–1302Google Scholar
  11. Harlow W, Rao R (1989) Asset Pricing in a Generalized Mean-Lower Partial Moments Framework. J Financ Quant Anal 4(3):285–311Google Scholar
  12. Hogan W, Warren JM (1974) Towards the Development of an Equilibrium Capital Market Model Based on Semi-variance. J Financ Quant Anal 9(1):1–11Google Scholar
  13. Israelsen C (2004) A refinement to the Sharpe ratio and information ratio. J Asset Manag 5(6):423–427Google Scholar
  14. Jensen MC (1968) The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964. J Financ 23(2):389–419Google Scholar
  15. Kang JK, Stulz R (1997) Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign equity ownership in Japan. J Financ Econ 46(1):3–28Google Scholar
  16. Kolm P, Tütüncü R, Fabozzi FJ (2014) 60 Years of portfolio optimization: Pratical challenges and current trends. Eur J Oper Res 234(2):356–371Google Scholar
  17. Ledoit O, Wolf M (2008) Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio. J Empir Financ 15(5):850–859Google Scholar
  18. Lintner J (1965) The Valuation of Risky Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47(1):13–37Google Scholar
  19. Lo A (2002) The Statistics of Sharpe ratios. Financ Anal J 58(4):36-52Google Scholar
  20. Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio Selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  21. Merton R (1987) A Simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Financ 42(3):483–510Google Scholar
  22. Messis P, Zapranis A (2014) Asset pricing with time-varying betas for stocks traded on S&P 500. Appl Econ 46(36):4508–4518Google Scholar
  23. Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica 34(4):768–783Google Scholar
  24. Sharpe W (1964) Capital Asset Prices – A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. J Financ 29(3):425–442Google Scholar
  25. Sharpe W (1966) Mutual fund performance. J Bus 39(1, Part 2):119–138Google Scholar
  26. Sharpe W (1994) The Sharpe Ratio. J Portf Manag 21(1):49–58Google Scholar
  27. Tsai H-J, Chen M-C, Yang C-Y (2014) A time-varying perspective on the CAPM and downside betas. Int Rev Econ Financ 29:440–454Google Scholar
  28. Zhou C (1998) Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with differential information. J Econ Dyn Control 22(7):1027–1051Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ISEG – Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Business and Economics Research (CeBER) and Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations