Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management

Abstract

A considerable number of organizations continually face difficulties bringing strategy to execution, and suffer from a lack of structure and transparency in corporate strategic management. Yet, enterprise architecture as a fundamental exercise to achieve a structured description of the enterprise and its relationships appears far from being adopted in the strategic management arena. To move the adoption process along, this paper develops a comprehensive business architecture framework that assimilates and extends prior research and applies the framework to selected scenarios in corporate strategic management. This paper also presents the approach in practice, based on a qualitative appraisal of interviews with strategic directors across different industries. With its integrated conceptual guideline for using enterprise architecture to facilitate corporate strategic management and the insights gained from the interviews, this paper not only delves more deeply into the research but also offers advice for both researchers and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Adams LA, Courtney JF (2004) Achieving relevance in is research via the DAGS framework. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii international conference on system sciences

  2. Aier S, Maletta F, Riege C, Stucki K, Frank A (2008a) Aufbau und Einsatz der Geschäftsarchitektur bei der AXA Winterthur—Ein minimal invasiver Ansatz. In: Proceedings der DW2008: Synergien durch Integration und Informationslogistik

  3. Aier S, Riege C, Winter R (2008b) Unternehmensarchitektur—Literaturüberblick und Stand der Praxis. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(4):292–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aitken C (2009) Enterprise architecture, strategic management, and information management. In: Doucet G, Gotze J, Saha P, Bernard S (eds) Coherency management—architecting the enterprise for alignment, agility and assurance. AuthorHouse, Bloomington, pp 121–155

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albers S (2010) Configurations of alliance governance systems. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 62:204–233

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Debei MM, Avison D (2010) Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur J Inf Syst 19:359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrews KR (1987) The concept of corporate strategy. Richard D Irwin, Homewood Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barney JB (1996) The resource-based theory of the firm. Org Sci 7(5):469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barney JB, Wright M, Ketchen DJ (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. J Manag 17:625–641

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barroero T, Motta G, Pignatelli G (2010) Business capabilities centric enterprise architecture. In: Bernus P, Doumeingts G, Fox M (eds) Enterprise architecture, integration and interoperability, pp 32–43

  13. Bartenschlager J, Goeken M (2010) IT strategy implementation framework—bridging enterprise architecture and IT governance. In: Proceedings of 16th Americas conference on information systems

  14. Baskerville R (2008) What design science is not. Eur J Inf Syst 17:441–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beck R, Weber S, Gregory RW (2012) Theory-generating design science research. Inf Syst Front. doi: 10.1007/s10796-012-9342-4

  16. Beimborn D, Marting SF, Homann U (2005) Capability-oriented modeling of the firm. In: Proceedings of the IPSI 2005 conference

  17. Bekkers W, Spruit M, van de Weerd I, van Vliet R, Mahieu A (2010) A situational assessment method for software product management. In: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems (ECIS)

  18. Bernard S (2005) An introduction to enterprise architecture. AuthorHouse, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bernard S (2009) The importance of formal documentation in enterprise architectures. J Enterp Archit 5(3):29–58

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bernus P (2003) Organisational design. In: Bernus P, Nemes L, Schmidt GJ (eds) Handbook on enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 575–594

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernus P, Nemes L, Schmidt GJ (2003) Handbook on enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bradford L, Rosemann M, Seidel S, ter Hofstede A (2006) Developing a business process reference model for the screen business—a design science research case study. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australasian conference on information systems

  23. Brits J, Botha GHK, Herselman ME (2007) Conceptual framework for modeling business capabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2007 informing science and IT education joint conference

  24. Buckl S, Ernst AM, Lankes J, Schneider K, Schweda CM (2007) A pattern based approach for constructing enterprise architecture management information models. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik 2007, pp 145–162

  25. Buckl S, Ernst AM, Lankes J, Matthes F (2008) Enterprise architecture management pattern catalogue. TU Munich, Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Germany

  26. Buckl S, Ernst AM, Lankes J, Matthes F, Schweda CM (2009) State of the art in enterprise architecture management 2009. TU Munich, Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Germany

  27. Buckl S, Schweda CM, Matthes F (2010a) A design theory nexus for situational enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international enterprise distributed object computing conference workshops, pp 3–8

  28. Buckl S, Matthes F, Schewda CM (2010b) Conceptual models for cross-cutting aspects in enterprise architecture modeling. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international enterprise distributed object computing conference workshops, pp 245–252

  29. Burkhart T, Krumeich J, Werth D, Loos P (2011) Analyzing the business model concept—a comprehensive classification of literature. In: 32nd international conference on information systems

  30. Capon N, Farley JU, Hulbert JM (1988) Corporate strategic planning. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cater T, Pucko D (2010) Factors of effective strategy implementation: empirical evidence from Slovenian business practice. J East Eur Manag Stud 15(3):207–236

    Google Scholar 

  32. David FR (2011) Strategic management—concepts & cases, 13th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  33. Day GS (1994) The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J Mark 58(4):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dubé L, Paré G (2003) Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Q 27(4):597–636

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dussauge P, Garette B (1999) Cooperative strategy: competing successfully through strategic alliances. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. EFQM (2011) The EFQM excellence model. http://www.efqm.org/

  37. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21:1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Engels G, Hess A, Humm B, Juwig O, Lohmann M, Richter JP, Voss M, Willkomm J (2008) Quasar enterprise. dpunkt, Heidelberg

  40. Felden C, Buder JJ (2012) Integrated information supply for decision support in grid companies. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fernandez WD (2004) The grounded theory method and case study data in IS research: issues and design. In: Proceedings of 2004 information systems foundations workshop: constructing and criticising

  42. Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K (1994) Defining competitiveness: a holistic approach. Manag Decis 32(2):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K (1995a) Strategy formulation: a learning methodology. Benchmark Qual Manag Technol 2(1):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K (1995b) Performance measurement in strategic change. Benchmark Qual Manag Technol 2(2):64–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K (1997) Strategy development: past, present and future. Train Qual 5(2):58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Flick U (2008) Designing qualitative research. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Flick U (2009) An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fritscher B, Pigneur Y (2010) Supporting business model modelling: a compromise between creativity and constraints. In: Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on task models and diagrams, pp 28–43

  49. Furrer O, Thomas H, Goussevskaia A (2008) The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: a content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. Int J Manag Rev 10(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ganesan E, Paturi R (2009) Key performance indicators framework—a method to track business objectives, link business strategy to processes and detail importance of key performance indicators in enterprise business architecture. In: Proceedings of 15th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS)

  51. Gläser J, Laudel G (2004) Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  52. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  53. Glissman S, Sanz J (2009) A comparative view of business architecture. IBM Research Report

  54. Goeken M, Johannsen W, Pfeiffer JC (2008) Motivation einer IT-Governance-Geschäftsarchitektur zur Unterstützung des Business/IT-alignments. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2008

  55. Goldkuhl G (2004) Design theories in information systems—a need for multi-grounding. J Inf Technol Theory Appl 6(2):59–72

    Google Scholar 

  56. Goodwin P, Wright G (2001) Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: a role for decision analysis. J Manag Stud 38(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Graves T (2010) Mapping the enterprise: modelling the enterprise as services with the enterprise canvas. Tetradian Books, England

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gregory RW (2010) Design science research and the grounded theory method: characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. In: Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems

  60. Gregory RW, Muntermann J (2011) Theorizing in design science research: inductive versus deductive approaches. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on information systems (ICIS)

  61. Hafeez K, Zhang Y, Malak N (2002) Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 76(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hastings S (1996) A strategy evaluation model for management. Manag Dec 34(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hax AC, Majluf NC (1984) The corporate strategic planning process. Interfaces 14(1):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hedman J, Kalling T (2002) The business model: a means to comprehend the management and business context of information and communication technology. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on information systems

  65. Hedman J, Kalling T (2003) The business model concept: theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. Eur J Inf Syst 12:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Helfat CE, Pereraf MA (2002) The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg Manag J 24:997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Henderson J, Venkatraman N (1992) Strategic alignment: a model for organizational transformation through information technology. In: Kochan T, Unseem M (eds) Transforming organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hevner AR (2007) A three cycle view of design science research. Scand J Inf Syst 19(2):87–92

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hirvonen A, Pulkkinen M, Valtonen K (2007) Selection criteria for enterprise architecture methods. In: Proceedings of the 2007 European conference on information management and evaluation

  71. Holmström J, Ketokivi M, Hameri AP (2009) Bridging practice and theory: a design science approach. Decis Sci 40(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hoogervorst JAP (2004) Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change. Int J Cooper Inf Syst 13(3):213–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hopf C (2005) Qualitative interviews—Ein Überblick. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds) Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch. Rowohlt, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jansen S, Brinkkemper S, Souer J, Luinenburg L (2012) Shades of gray: opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. J Syst Soft 85(7):1495–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kalpic B, Pandza K, Bernus P (2003) Strategy as a creation of corporate future. In: Bernus P, Nemes L, Schmidt GJ (eds) Handbook on enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–254

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kantabutra S, Avery GC (2010) The power of vision: statements that reasonate. J Bus Strategy 31(1):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The strategy-focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard School Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard School Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  79. Kappelman L, McGinnis T, Pettite A, Salmans B, Sidorova A (2008) Enterprise architecture: charting the territory for academic research. In: Proceedings of 14th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS)

  80. Keller W (2009) Using capabilities in enterprise architecture management. object architects, whitepaper

  81. Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q 23(1):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Klinkmüller C, Ludwig A, Franczyk B, Kluge R (2010) Visualising business capabilities in the context of business analysis. In: Proceedings of business information systems 2010, Berlin

  83. Kohlborn T, Korthaus A, Chan T, Rosemann M (2009) Identification and analysis of business and software services—a consolidated approach. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2(1):50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2007) Viewpoint-based meta model engineering. In: Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on enterprise modelling and information systems architectures, pp 143–161

  85. Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2009) Concern-oriented business architecture engineering. In: Proceedings of SAC 2009

  86. Kvale S (1989) To validate is to question. In: Kvale S (ed) Issues of validity in qualitative research. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kvale S (2007) Doing interviews. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  88. Leganza G (2010) Topic overview: information architecture. Forrester Research Report 55951

  89. Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q 29(2):335–363

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lucke C, Krell S, Lechner U (2010) Critical issues in enterprise architecting—a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 16th Americas conference on information systems

  91. Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C (2000) Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Br J Psychol 91(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Malik N (2009) Toward an enterprise business motivation model. Architect J 19:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  93. Matthes F, Buckl S, Leitel J, Schweda CM (2008) Enterprise architecture management tool survey 2008. TU Munich, Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Germany

  94. Micklich DL (2005) Strategic implications of causal mapping in strategy analysis and formulation. In: Narayanan VK, Armstrong DJ (eds) Causual mapping for research in information technology. IGI Global, pp 284–311

  95. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998) Strategy safari—a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  96. Mocker M (2009) What is complex about 273 applications? Untangling application architecture complexity in a case of European investment banking. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences

  97. Molina A (2003) Developing the enterprise concept—the business plan. In: Bernus P, Nemes L, Schmidt GJ (eds) Handbook on enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 333–372

    Google Scholar 

  98. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J (2002) Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Int J Qual Methods 1(2):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  99. Müller B, Olbrich S (2011) The artifact’s theory—a grounded theory perspective on design science research. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2011), pp 1176–1186

  100. Niemann KD (2006) From enterprise architecture to IT governance—elements of effective IT management. Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  101. Niemann KD (2008) Enterprise architecture management and its role in IT governance and IT investment planning. In: Saha P (ed) Advances in government enterprise architecture. Information Science Reference, New York, pp 208–228

    Google Scholar 

  102. Object Management Group (2010) The business motivation model, version 1.1. OMG document number: formal/2010-05-01

  103. Offermann P, Levina O, Schönherr M, Bub U (2009) Outline of a design science research process. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on design science research in information systems and technology

  104. Op’t Land M, Proper E, Waage M, Cloo J, Steghuis C (2009) Enterprise architecture—creating value by informed governance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  105. Österle H, Winter R, Höning F, Kurpjuweit S, Osl P (2007) Business Engineering: Core-Business-Metamodell. WISU—Das Wirtschaftsstudium 2/07:191–194

  106. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2002) Business models and their elements. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on business models 2002

  107. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2003) An ontology for e-business models. In: Currie W (ed) Value creation from e-business models. Butterworth-Heinemann

  108. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation—a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  109. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 16(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  110. Pagh JD, Cooper MC (1998) Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy. J Bus Logist 19(2):13–33

    Google Scholar 

  111. Parker T (2009) The strategic dimension of enterprise architecture. In: Doucet G, Gotze J, Saha P, Bernard S (eds) Coherency management—architecting the enterprise for alignment, agility and assurance. AuthorHouse, Bloomington, pp 157–178

    Google Scholar 

  112. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Gengler CE, Rossi M, Hui W, Virtanen V, Bragge J (2006) The design science research process: a model for producing an presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 1st International conference on design science research in information systems and technology, pp 83–106

  113. Peng GCA, Nunes MB (2007) Using PEST analysis as a tool for refining and focusing contexts for information systems research. In: Proceedings of the 6th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 229–236

  114. Pereira CM, Sousa P (2005) Enterprise architecture: business and it alignment. In: Proceedings of SAC 2005

  115. Pfohl HC (2004) Logistikmanagement: Konzeption und Funktionen. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  116. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analysing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  117. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev 68(3):79–91

    Google Scholar 

  118. Radeke F (2011) Toward understanding enterprise architecture management’s role in strategic change: antecedents, processes, outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (2011), pp 497–507

  119. Raps A (2008) Erfolgsfaktoren der Strategieimplementierung: Konzeption und Instrumente. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  120. Reichwald R, Piller F (2009) Interaktive Wertschöpfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Gabler-Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  121. Reihlen M, Smets M, Veit A (2010) Management consultancies as institutional agents: strategies for creating and sustaining institutional capital. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 62:317–339

    Google Scholar 

  122. Repschlaeger J, Wind S, Zarnekow R, Turowski K (2012) Selection criteria for software as a service: an explorative analysis of provider requirements. In: Proceedings of 18th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS)

  123. Riege C, Aier S (2009) A contingency approach to enterprise architecture method engineering. J Enterp Architect 5(1):36–48

    Google Scholar 

  124. Ross JW, Weill P, Robertson DC (2006) Enterprise architecture as strategy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  125. Rossi M, Sein MK (2003) Design research workshop: a proactive research approach. In: 26th Information systems research seminar in Scandinavia, IRIS Association, Finland

  126. Saat J (2010) Zeitbezogene Abhängigkeitsanalysen der Unternehmensarchitektur. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2010, pp 119–130

  127. Samavi R, Yu E, Topaloglou T (2009) Strategic reasoning about business models: a conceptual modeling approach. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag 7:171–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Sandberg J (2000) Understanding human competence at work: an interpretive approach. Acad Manag J 43(1):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Schäffer U, Willauer B (2003) Strategic planning as a learning process. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 55:86–107

    Google Scholar 

  130. Schekkerman J (2004) Trends in enterprise architecture: how are organizations progressing? Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments

  131. Schlagwein D, Fischbach K, Schoder D, Bartsch S (2010) Open value creation: a framework for open and collaborative value creation concepts. In: Proceedings of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2010

  132. Schmidt C (2005) Analyse von Leitfadeninterviews. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds) Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch. rororo, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  133. Schultze U, Avital M (2011) Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inf Org 21:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Shafer SM, Smith HJ, Linder JC (2005) The power of business models. Bus Horizons 48:199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Simon D, Fischbach K, Schoder D (2010) Application portfolio management—an integrated framework and a software tool evaluation approach. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 26(1):35–56

    Google Scholar 

  137. Simon D, Fischbach K, Schoder D (2013) An exploration of enterprise architecture research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 32(1):1–72

    Google Scholar 

  138. Smith KL (2011) An introduction to PEAF–pragmatic enterprise architecture framework. Pragmatic EA, England

    Google Scholar 

  139. Spewak SH, Hill SC (1993) Enterprise architecture planning: developing a blueprint for data, Applications and Technology. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  140. Steiss A (1985) Strategic management and organizational decision making. D.C. Heath, Lexington

  141. The Open Group (2009) TOGAF version 9 enterprise edition. Van Haren Publishing, The Netherlands

  142. The Open Group (2012) ArchiMate 2.0 specification. Van Haren Publishing, The Netherlands

  143. Uppington G, Bernus P (2003) Analysing the present situation and refining strategy. In: Bernus P, Nemes L, Schmidt GJ (eds) Handbook on enterprise architecture. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–332

    Google Scholar 

  144. Urbach N, Würz T (2012) How to steer the IT outsourcing provider: development and validation of a reference framework of IT outsourcing steering processes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(5):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. van Gils B (2009) Strategy and architecture—reconciling worldviews. In: Advances in enterprise engineering II, first NAF academy working conference on practice-driven research on enterprise transformation (PRET 2009), pp 181–196

  146. van Steenbergen M, Bos R, Brinkkemper S, van de Weerd I, Bekkers W (2010) The design of focus area maturity models. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST), pp 317–332

  147. Versteeg G, Bouwman H (2006) Business architecture: a new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Inf Syst Front 8:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. vom Brocke J, Buddendick C (2006) Reusable conceptual models—requirements based on the design science research paradigm. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST)

  149. Wang JC, College HW (2006) Corporate strategic management and business re-engineering effort analyzed by the balanced scorecard model. J Am Acad Bus 10(1):102–109

    Google Scholar 

  150. Weedman J (2008) Client as designer in collaborative design science research projects: what does social science design theory tell us? Eur J Inf Syst 17(5):476–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Whittle R, Myrick CB (2004) Enterprise business architecture: the formal link between strategy and results. Auerbach Publications, USA

    Google Scholar 

  152. Winter R (2002) Business strategy modelling in the information age. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international web conference, Perth

  153. Winter R (2003) Modelle, Techniken und Werkzeuge im Business Engineering. In: Österle H, Winter R (eds) Business engineering—Auf dem Weg zum Unternehmen des Informationszeitalters. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–118

    Google Scholar 

  154. Winter R, Fischer R (2007) Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. J Enterp Architect 3(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  155. Winter R, Bucher T, Fischer R, Kurpjuweit S (2007) Analysis and application scenarios of enterprise architecture: an exploratory study. J Enterp Architecture 3

    Google Scholar 

  156. Winter K, Buckl S, Matthes F, Schweda CM (2010) Investigating the state-of-the-art in enterprise architecture management methods in literature and practice. In: Proceedings of the 5th mediterranean conference on information systems (MCIS) 2010, Tel Aviv

  157. Wirtz B (2011) Business model management: design—instruments—success factors. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  158. Zachman J (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Zellner G (2008) Gestaltung hybrider Wertschöpfung mittels Architekturen—Analyse am Beispiel des Business Engineering. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(3):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Zott C, Amit R (2009) Designing your future business model: an activity system perspective. IESE Business School—University of Navarra, Working Paper 781

  161. zu Knyphausen-Aufseß D, Meinhardt Y (2002) Revisiting strategy: Ein Ansatz zur Systematisierung von Geschäftsmodellen. In: Bieger T, Bickhoff N, Caspers D, zu Knyphausen-Aufseß D, Reding K (eds) Zukünftige Geschäftsmodelle: Konzept und Anwendung in der Netzökonomie. Springer, Berlin

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the valuable comments and help provided by Scott M. Cooper, Michael J. Shaw, and the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Fischbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, D., Fischbach, K. & Schoder, D. Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 12, 5–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0213-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Enterprise architecture
  • Enterprise architecture management
  • Business architecture
  • Corporate strategic management
  • Strategic planning
  • Business model