Skip to main content
Log in

Application portfolio management: a decision-oriented view of enterprise architecture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today large companies operate 100s of computer-based information systems (IS), also called applications, to support their businesses. Enterprise Architecture (EA) is regarded as a promising concept to cope with the complexity caused by large application portfolios (AP). This article focuses on senior IT managers’ decision-making with regard to their AP, and EA’s role therein. Through multiple case studies in large companies, we found that these managers consider and balance a set of aspects, each of which is supported by partial EA models maintained by specific groups within their IT departments. These models are, however, not sufficiently integrated. Based on the empirical findings, we propose indicators for each of the partial EA models to aggregate the AP-relevant characteristics per application, which are then integrated into an AP dashboard to support senior IT managers’ holistic AP management. Consequently, a decision-oriented view is created of the overall EA, which the managers of the case studies companies deemed to be very helpful for steering their AP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dern G (2003) Management von IT-Architekturen: Informationssysteme im Fokus von Architekturplanung und–entwicklung. Vieweg, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U (2002) Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO)—conceptual framework and modeling languages, In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, pp 1258–1267

  • Grembergen Wv (2000) The Balanced Scorecard and IT Governance. Inf Syst Control J 2:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ (2006) Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Oldenbourg, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March AT et al (2004): Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (2000) Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (IEEE Std 1471-2000), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York

  • Johansson E, Ekstedt M et al (2006) Assessment of enterprise information security—the importance of information search cost, In: Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Track 9, p 219.1

  • Jonkers H, Lankhorst M et al (2004) Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures. Int J Coop Inf Syst 13(3):257–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RE, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Krallmann H, Schönherr M et al (2005) Einführung in den Track Enterprise application architecture. In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 1.441–1.442

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankes J, Matthes F et al (2005) Softwarekartographie: systematische Darstellung von Anwendungslandschaften. In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, sSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 1.443–1.462

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudon KC, Laudon JP (2002) Management information systems—managing the digital firm. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Longepe C (2003) The enterprise architecture IT project: the urbanisation paradigm. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes F, Wittenburg A (2004) Softwarekarten zur Visualisierung von Anwendungslandschaften und ihren Aspekten, Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Informatik 19 (sebis), Technischer Bericht 02/04, http://www.matthes.in.tum.de/file/Publikationen/2004/MaWi04a/040326–MaWi-Statusbericht-Softwarekartographie.pdf (last accessed on 2 Aug 2006)

  • Namba Y, Iijima J (2004) City planning approach for enterprise information systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS 2004), Shanghai, pp 169–180

  • Office of Government Commerce (2005) Service support, 12th impression. TSO, London

  • Office of Government Commerce (2006) Application management, 4th impression. TSO, London

  • Österle H, Brenner W et al (1993) Total information systems management: a European approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Perks C, Beveridge T (2003) Guide to enterprise IT architecture. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer A-W (1998) ARIS—business process frameworks, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönherr M (2004) Enterprise architecture frameworks. In: Aier S, Schönherr M (eds) Enterprise application integration. GITO, Berlin, pp 3–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinn A, Winter R (2005) Entwicklung von Zielen und Messgrößen zur Steuerung der Applikationsintegration, In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 587–606

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sowa JF, Zachman JA (1992) Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 31(3):590–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Open Group (2003) TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework), Version 8.1 “Enterprise Edition”, The Open Group, San Francisco

  • Weill P, Ross JW (2004) IT governance: how top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter R (2003) An architecture model for supporting application integration decisions, In: Ciborra CU et al (eds) Proceedings of 11th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Naples

  • Yin RK (2006) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman JA (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):276–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnekow R, Hochstein A et al (2005) Service-orientiertes IT-management: ITIL-best-practices und Fallstudien. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerold Riempp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riempp, G., Gieffers-Ankel, S. Application portfolio management: a decision-oriented view of enterprise architecture. ISeB 5, 359–378 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-007-0052-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-007-0052-2

Keywords

Navigation