Abstract
Today large companies operate 100s of computer-based information systems (IS), also called applications, to support their businesses. Enterprise Architecture (EA) is regarded as a promising concept to cope with the complexity caused by large application portfolios (AP). This article focuses on senior IT managers’ decision-making with regard to their AP, and EA’s role therein. Through multiple case studies in large companies, we found that these managers consider and balance a set of aspects, each of which is supported by partial EA models maintained by specific groups within their IT departments. These models are, however, not sufficiently integrated. Based on the empirical findings, we propose indicators for each of the partial EA models to aggregate the AP-relevant characteristics per application, which are then integrated into an AP dashboard to support senior IT managers’ holistic AP management. Consequently, a decision-oriented view is created of the overall EA, which the managers of the case studies companies deemed to be very helpful for steering their AP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dern G (2003) Management von IT-Architekturen: Informationssysteme im Fokus von Architekturplanung und–entwicklung. Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Frank U (2002) Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO)—conceptual framework and modeling languages, In: Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, pp 1258–1267
Grembergen Wv (2000) The Balanced Scorecard and IT Governance. Inf Syst Control J 2:40–43
Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ (2006) Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Oldenbourg, München
Hevner AR, March AT et al (2004): Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105
IEEE (2000) Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (IEEE Std 1471-2000), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York
Johansson E, Ekstedt M et al (2006) Assessment of enterprise information security—the importance of information search cost, In: Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Track 9, p 219.1
Jonkers H, Lankhorst M et al (2004) Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures. Int J Coop Inf Syst 13(3):257–287
Kaplan RE, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
Krallmann H, Schönherr M et al (2005) Einführung in den Track Enterprise application architecture. In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 1.441–1.442
Lankes J, Matthes F et al (2005) Softwarekartographie: systematische Darstellung von Anwendungslandschaften. In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, sSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 1.443–1.462
Lankhorst M (2005) Enterprise architecture at work. Springer, Berlin
Laudon KC, Laudon JP (2002) Management information systems—managing the digital firm. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Longepe C (2003) The enterprise architecture IT project: the urbanisation paradigm. Kogan Page, London
Matthes F, Wittenburg A (2004) Softwarekarten zur Visualisierung von Anwendungslandschaften und ihren Aspekten, Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Informatik 19 (sebis), Technischer Bericht 02/04, http://www.matthes.in.tum.de/file/Publikationen/2004/MaWi04a/040326–MaWi-Statusbericht-Softwarekartographie.pdf (last accessed on 2 Aug 2006)
Namba Y, Iijima J (2004) City planning approach for enterprise information systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS 2004), Shanghai, pp 169–180
Office of Government Commerce (2005) Service support, 12th impression. TSO, London
Office of Government Commerce (2006) Application management, 4th impression. TSO, London
Österle H, Brenner W et al (1993) Total information systems management: a European approach. Wiley, Chichester
Perks C, Beveridge T (2003) Guide to enterprise IT architecture. Springer, New York
Scheer A-W (1998) ARIS—business process frameworks, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Schönherr M (2004) Enterprise architecture frameworks. In: Aier S, Schönherr M (eds) Enterprise application integration. GITO, Berlin, pp 3–48
Schwinn A, Winter R (2005) Entwicklung von Zielen und Messgrößen zur Steuerung der Applikationsintegration, In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 587–606
Sowa JF, Zachman JA (1992) Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 31(3):590–616
The Open Group (2003) TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework), Version 8.1 “Enterprise Edition”, The Open Group, San Francisco
Weill P, Ross JW (2004) IT governance: how top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Winter R (2003) An architecture model for supporting application integration decisions, In: Ciborra CU et al (eds) Proceedings of 11th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Naples
Yin RK (2006) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks
Zachman JA (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):276–292
Zarnekow R, Hochstein A et al (2005) Service-orientiertes IT-management: ITIL-best-practices und Fallstudien. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riempp, G., Gieffers-Ankel, S. Application portfolio management: a decision-oriented view of enterprise architecture. ISeB 5, 359–378 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-007-0052-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-007-0052-2