Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical likelihood for response differences in two linear regression models with missing data

  • Published:
Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider two linear models X i = U i β + ε i Y j = V j γ + η j with response variables missing at random. In this paper, we assume that X, Y are missing at random (MAR) and use the inverse probability weighted imputation to produce ‘complete’ data sets for X and Y. Based on these data sets, we construct an empirical likelihood (EL) statistic for the difference of X and Y (denoted as Δ), and show that the EL statistic has the limiting distribution of χ 21 , which is used to construct a confidence interval for Δ. Results of a simulation study on the finite sample performance of EL-based confidence intervals on Δ are reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, J., Rao, J.N.K. Asymptotic normality under two-phase sampling designs. Statistica Sinica, 17: 1047–1064 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall, P., La Scala, B. Methodology and algorithms of empirical likelihood. Int. Statist. Rev., 58: 109–127 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, P., Martin, M. On the bootstrap and two-sample problems. Austral J. Statist, 30A: 179–192 (1988)

  4. Jing, B.Y. Two-sample empirical likelihood method. Statist. Prob. Lett., 24: 315–319 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Owen, A.B. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika, 75: 237–249 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Owen, A.B. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann. Statist., 18: 90–120 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Qin, J., Lawless, J. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann. Statist., 22: 300–325 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Qin, Y., Zhang, S. Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for differences between two datasets with missing data. Pattern Recognition Letters, 29: 803–812 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qin. Y., Zhao, L. Empirical likelihood ratio intervals for the quantile differences of two populations. Chinese Ann. Math., 18A: 687–694 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Randles, R.H. On the asymptotic normality of statistics with estimated parameters. Ann. Statist., 10: 462–474 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Serfling, R.J. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1980)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, D. Strong convergence of kernel estimates of regression functions. Chinese Ann. Math., 6A: 480–486 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-song Qin.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11271088, 11361011, 11201088) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (No. 2013GXNSFAA(019004 and 019007), 2013GXNSFBA019001).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, Ys., Qiu, T. & Lei, Qz. Empirical likelihood for response differences in two linear regression models with missing data. Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 31, 963–976 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-015-0516-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10255-015-0516-y

Keywords

2000 MR Subject Classification

Navigation