Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Local resistance patterns to antimicrobials in internal medicine: a focused report from the REGIMEN (REGistro Infezioni in MEdicina INterna) study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment for infections in hospitalized patients can be summarized in the timely start of empirical therapy, followed by adjustment on the basis of isolates and microbial susceptibilities. Initial therapy may be based on international guidelines. However, to know local frequencies of bacterial and fungal strains together with patterns of drug resistance should be a better approach to therapy. REGIMEN is a retrospective observational study of all consecutive recorded bacterial and fungal isolates, collected between October 2009 and August 2011 from patients admitted in a 53-bedded ward of internal medicine of a non-teaching Italian hospital. We investigated type of samples and of microorganisms, patterns of susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics, and in-hospital mortality. A total of 504 samples were examined (244 from urine, 189 from blood and 71 from skin and various exudates). Participants were old (mean age, 83 years), and so overall mortality was high (20 %). There were high frequencies of drug resistance; only 27.9 % of urinary gram-negatives and 52.6 % of blood gram-negatives were susceptible to levofloxacin. Susceptibility profiles compatible with the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases were present in 64.2 % of gram-negative strains, and 10.1 % were also resistant to carbapenems. ESKAPE organisms account for a third of all bacterial infections. Local patterns of drug resistance should influence empirical antibiotic therapy for patients admitted in internal medicine wards, where mortality is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leeka S, Terrel CL, Edson RS (2011) General principles of antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 86:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Delinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM et al (2008) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2008. Crit Care Med 36:296–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kollef MH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ (1999) Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Chest 115:462–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2000) The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 118:146–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson RL, Wright AJ (1998) General principles of antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 73:995–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (2008) In: Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction. JSI Research and Training Institute, Inc. Prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections in Massachusetts. Part 1: final recommendations of the Expert Panel. Boston (MA): Massachusetts Department of Public Health, pp 83–89

  7. Lo E, Nicolle L, Classen D et al (2008) Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1:S41–S50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Horan TC, Andrus MA, Dudeck MA (2008) CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 36:309–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. CLSI 2009. Performance standards for disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard, 10th Ed, M02-A10 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (2008) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 91: treatment of urinary tract infections in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 111(3):785–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) (2005) Urinary tract infection. Ann Arbor (MI), 2005. Accessed at http://www.med.umich.edu/1info/fhp/practiceguides/uti/uti.pdf on 2010/11/13

  12. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2006) Management of suspected bacterial urinary tract infection. Nurs Times 102(36):25–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC et al (2010) Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:625–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grabe M, Bishop MC, Bjerklund-Johansen TE et al (2009) Guidelines on urological infections. Arnhem. http://www.med.umich.edu/1info/fhp/practiceguides/uti/uti.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2010

  15. Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Kariv G, Robenshtok E, Leibovici L (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4851–4863

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Micek ST, Welch EC, Khan J, Pervez M, Doherty JA, Reichley RM et al (2011) Resistance to empiric antimicrobial treatment predicts outcome in severe sepsis associated with gram-negative bacteremia. J Hosp Med 6:405–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogelaers D, De Bels D, Foret F, Cran S, Gilbert E, Scoonheydt K et al (2010) Patterns of antimicrobial therapy in severe nosocomial infections: empiric choices, proportion of appropriate therapy, and adaptation rates–a multicentre, observational survey in critically ill patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35:375–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pop-Vicas A, Tacconelli E, Gravestein S, D’Agata EM (2009) Influx of multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacteria in the hospital setting and the role of elderly patients with bacterial bloodstream infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Cei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cei, M., Pardelli, R., Sani, S. et al. Local resistance patterns to antimicrobials in internal medicine: a focused report from the REGIMEN (REGistro Infezioni in MEdicina INterna) study. Clin Exp Med 14, 77–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-012-0219-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-012-0219-0

Keywords

Navigation