Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element simulation of cochlear traveling wave under air and bone conduction hearing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides the normal hearing pathway known as air conduction (AC), sound can also transmit to the cochlea through the skull, known as bone conduction (BC). During BC stimulation, the cochlear walls demonstrate rigid body motion (RBM) and compressional motion (CPM), both inducing the basilar membrane traveling wave (TW). Despite numerous measuring and modeling efforts for the TW phenomenon, the mechanism remains unclear, especially in the case of BC. This paper proposes a 3D finite element cochlea model mimicking the TW under BC. The model uses a traditional “box model” form, but in a spiral shape, with two fluid chambers separated by the long and flexible BM. The cochlear fluid was enclosed by bony walls, the oval and round window membranes. Contingent boundary conditions and stimulations are introduced according to the physical basis of AC and BC. Particularly for BC, both RBM and CPM of the cochlea walls are simulated. Harmonic numerical solutions are obtained at multiple frequencies among the hearing range. The BM vibration amplitude (\(U_{{{\text{BM}}}}\)) and its relation with volume displacement difference between the oval and round windows \((\Delta {\text{Vol}})\), as well as the pressure difference at the base of the cochlea (\(P_{{{\text{SV}}}} \left( 0 \right) - P_{{{\text{ST}}}} \left( 0 \right)\)), are analyzed. The simulated BM response at 12 mm from the base is peaked at about 3 k Hz, which is consistent with published experimental data. The TW properties under AC and BC are the same and have a common mechanism. (1) \(U_{{{\text{BM}}}}\) is proportional to \({\Delta }Vol\) at low frequencies. (2) \(U_{{{\text{BM}}}}\) is also proportional to \(P_{{{\text{SV}}}} \left( 0 \right) - P_{{{\text{ST}}}} \left( 0 \right)\), within 5 dB error at high frequencies such as 16 k Hz. This study partly reveals the common quantitative relations between the TW and related factors under AC and BC hearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banakis-Hartl RM et al (2016) A preliminary investigation of the air-bone gap: Changes in intracochlear sound pressure with air-and bone-conducted stimuli after cochlear implantation. Otolo Neurotol 37(9):1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhnke F, Arnold W (2006) Bone conduction in a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. ORL 68(6):393–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan Wei Xuan, Yoon Yong-Jin, Kim Namkeun (2018) Mechanism of bone-conducted hearing: mathematical approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17(6):1731–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer E (1996) Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. In: Dallos P., Popper A.N., Fay R.R. (eds) The Cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 8. Springer, New York, NY, pp 258–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0757-3_5

  • Dobrev I et al (2017) Sround wave propagation on the human skull surface with bone conduction stimulation. Hear Res 355:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeg-Olofsson M et al (2013) Transmission of bone conducted sound–correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibration. Hear Res 306:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell NF et al (2017) Intracochlear measurements of interaural time and level differences conveyed by bilateral bone conduction systems. Otol Neurotol 38(10):1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan RZ, Reeves BP, Wang X (2007) Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea. Ann Biomed Eng 35(12):2180–2195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DD (1990) A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 87(6):2592–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber AM et al (2013) The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 301:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igarashi M, Ohashi K, Ishii M (1986) Morphometric comparison of endolymphatic and perilymphatic spaces in human temporal bones. Acta Otolaryngol 101(3–4):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keguang C et al (2019) Bone conduction hearing in the blockage of oval and/or round windows in cats. Acta Oto-laryngol 139(3):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim N, Homma K, Puria S (2011) Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(3):261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim N, Steele CR, Puria S (2014) The importance of the hook region of the cochlea for bone-conduction hearing. Biophys J 107(1):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J et al (2020) Experimental and numerical studies on vibration modes and transcranial attenuation characteristics in unilateral bone conduction hearing. Shock Vib 2020:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren L-J et al. (2018) Three-dimensional finite element hydrodynamical modeling of straight and spiral cochlea.In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 1965(1) AIP Publishing LLC

  • Liu-jie R et al (2013) Hydrodynamic modeling of cochlea and numerical simulation for cochlear traveling wave with consideration of fluid-structure interaction. J Hydrodyn Ser B 25(2):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liujie R et al (2017) Parameter analysis of 2d cochlear model and quantitative research on the traveling wave propagation. J Mech Med Biol 17(2):1750033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni Guangjian et al (2014) Modelling cochlear mechanics. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/150637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall AL, Dolan DF, Avinash GB (1991) Laser doppler velocimetry of basilar membrane vibration. Hear Res 51:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson ES, Duifhuis H, Steele CR (2012) Von Békésy and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 293(1–2):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson LC, Bogert BP (1950) A dynamical theory of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 22(3):369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popelka GR, Moore BCJ (2016) Future directions for hearing aid development. In: Popelka G., Moore B., Fay R., Popper A. (eds) Hearing Aids. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 56. Springer, Cham, pp 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33036-5_11

  • Puria S (2003) Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: Implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 113(5):2773–2789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recio-Spinoso A, Oghalai JS (2017) Mechanical tuning and amplification within the apex of the guinea pig cochlea. J Physiol 595(13):4549–4561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode WS (1971) Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 49(4B):1218–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles L, Ruggero MA (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81(3):1305–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele CR, Taber LA (1981) Three-dimensional model calculations for guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 69(4):1107–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefan S (2015) Cochlear boundary motion during bone conduction stimulation: implications for inertial and compressional excitation of the cochlea. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 1703(1) AIP Publishing LLC

  • Stefan S (2020) Investigation of mechanisms in bone conduction hyperacusis with third window pathologies based on model predictions. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefan S, Hato N, Goode RL (2004) Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 115(2):797–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S (2007) Simultaneous cancellation of air and bone conduction tones at two frequencies: extension of the famous experiment by von Békésy. Hear Res 225(1–2):105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S (2011) Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing. In: Kompis M, Caversaccio M-D (eds) Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Aids. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, vol 71. Basel, Karger, pp 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000323574

  • Stenfelt S (2015) Inner ear contribution to bone conduction hearing in the human. Hear Res 329:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S (2016) Model predictions for bone conduction perception in the human. Hear Res 340:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S, Goode RL (2005) Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 26(6):1245–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S, Håkansson Bo, Tjellström A (2000) Vibration characteristics of bone conducted sound in vitro. J Acoust Soc Am 107(1):422–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S et al (2003) Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli. Hear Res 181(1–2):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenfelt S, Hato N, Goode RL (2004) Round window membrane motion with air conduction and bone conduction stimulation. Hear Res 198(1–2):10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Systèmes D (2013) ABAQUS theory guide, v6. 13. Dassault Systèmes, Waltham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Takuji K et al (2012) Effects of a perilymphatic fistula on the passive vibration response of the basilar membrane. Hear Res 283(1–2):117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Terje G, Skarstein Ø, Sikkeland T (1978) A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the Mossbauer effect. Acta Oto-laryngol 86(1–6):225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonndorf, J (1976) Bone conduction. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD(eds) Auditory System. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol 5/3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 37–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66082-5_2

  • Von Békésy G, Wever EG (1960) Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki J (1999) Dimensions of the human vestibular and tympanic scalae. Hear Res 135(1–2):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Joon S et al (2018) Update on bone-conduction auditory brainstem responses: a review. J Audiol Otol 22(2):53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Gan RZ (2013) Dynamic properties of human round window membrane in auditory frequencies running head: dynamic properties of round window membrane. Med Eng Phys 35(3):310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81771014) and Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology of China (17ZR1402800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cheng Hua or Tian-Yu Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, LJ., Yu, Y., Fang, YQ. et al. Finite element simulation of cochlear traveling wave under air and bone conduction hearing. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20, 1251–1265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01443-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01443-7

Keywords

Navigation