Skip to main content
Log in

Breaking the state of the heart: meshless model for cardiac mechanics

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac modeling has recently emerged as a promising tool to study pathophysiology mechanisms and to predict treatment outcomes for personalized clinical decision support. Nevertheless, achieving convergence under large deformation and defining a robust meshing for realistic heart geometries remain challenging, especially when maintaining the computational cost reasonable. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) appears to be a promising alternative to the finite element method (FEM) since it removes the burden of mesh generation. A point cloud is used where each point (particle) contains all the physical properties that are updated throughout the simulation. SPH was evaluated for solid mechanics applications in the last decade but its capacity to address the challenge of simulating the mechanics of the heart has never been evaluated. In this paper, a total Lagrangian formulation of a corrected SPH was used to solve three solid mechanics problems designed to test important features that a cardiac mechanics solver should have. SPH results, in terms of ventricle displacements and strains, were compared to results obtained with 11 different FEM-based solvers, by using synthetic cardiac data from a benchmark study. In particular, passive dilation and active contraction were simulated in an ellipsoidal left ventricle with the exponential anisotropic constitutive law of Guccione following the direction of fibers. The proposed meshless method is able to reproduce the results of three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics. Hyperelastic material with fiber orientation and high Poisson ratio allows wall thickening/thinning when large deformation is present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When the difference in temperature is taken into account, a thermal energy equation should be added in Eq. (2)

References

  • Allan F (2010) Bower: applied mechanics of solids. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S (2007) Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH. Comput Struct 85:879–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babuška I, Banerjee U, Osborn JE, Zhang Q (2009) Effect of numerical integration on meshless methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(37–40):2886–2897

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Dolbow J, Gerlach C (1998) On the completeness of meshfree particle methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(5):785–819

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Biglino G, Capelli C, Bruse J, Bosi GM, Taylor AM, Schievano S (2017) Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation? Heart 103:98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet J, Kulasegaram S, Rodriguez-Paz MX, Profit M (2004) Variational formulation for the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation of fluid and solid problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(12–14):1245–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet J, Lok TS (1999) Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180(1–2):97–115

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chabiniok R, Wang VY, Hadjicharalambous M, Asner L, Lee J, Sermesant M, Kuhl E, Young AA, Moireau P (2016) Nash: multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data-model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics. Interface Focus 6(2):20150,083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JK, Beraun JE, Carney TC (1999) A corrective smoothed particle method for boundary value problems in heat conduction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(2):231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies MR, Wang K, Mirams GR, Caruso A, Noble D, Walz A, Lavé T, Schuler F, Singer T, Polonchuk L (2016) Recent developments in using mechanistic cardiac modelling for drug safety evaluation. Drug Discov Today 21(6):924–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douillet-Grellier T, Pramanik R, Pan K, Albaiz A, Jones BD, Williams JR (2016) Development of stress boundary conditions in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for the modeling of solids deformation. Comput Part Mech 1–21

  • Duchateau N, Sermesant M, Delingette H, Ayache N (2017) Model-based generation of large databases of cardiac images: synthesis of pathological cine MR sequences from real healthy cases. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyka CT, Ingel RP (1995) An approach for tension instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Struct 57(4):573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzenmueller GC (2015) An hourglass control algorithm for Lagrangian smooth particle hydrodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 286:87–106

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Wang H, Berry C, Luo X, Griffith BE (2014) Quasi-static image-based immersed boundary-finite element model of left ventricle under diastolic loading. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 30(11):1199–1222

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guccione JM, Costa KD, McCulloch aD (1995) Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart. J Biomech 28(10):1167–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han L, Hu X (2018) Sph modeling of fluid-structure interaction. J Hydrodyn 30:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Seaid M (2016) A Runge–Kutta–Chebyshev SPH algorithm for elastodynamics. Acta Mech 227(7):1813–1835

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horton A, Wittek A, Joldes GR, Miller K (2010) A meshless Total Lagrangian explicit dynamics algorithm for surgical simulation. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 26:977–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krog ØE, Elster AC (2012) Fast GPU-Based fluid simulations using SPH. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol 7134 LNCS, pp 98–109

  • Land S et al, Repository for the cardiac mechanics benchmark. http://www.bitbucket.org/sander314/ mechbench. Accessed 20 Jan 2018

  • Land S et al (2015) Verification of cardiac mechanics software: benchmark problems and solutions for testing active and passive material behaviour. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 471(2184):20150,641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovas Imaging 16:233–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroch S, Varga M, Eder SJ, Vernes A, Rodriguez Ripoll M, Ganzenmüller G (2016) Smooth particle hydrodynamics simulation of damage induced by a spherical indenter scratching a viscoplastic material. Int J Solids Struct 81(December):188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libersky LD, Petschek AG (1991) Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials. In: Advances in the free-Lagrange method including contributions on adaptive gridding and the smooth particle hydrodynamics method. Springer, Berlin , pp 248–257

  • Lin J, Naceur H, Coutellier D, Laksimi A (2014) Efficient meshless SPH method for the numerical modeling of thick shell structures undergoing large deformations. Int J Nonlinear Mech 65:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lluch È, Doste R, Giffard-Roisin S, This A, Sermesant M, Camara O, De Craene M, Morales HG (2017) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for electrophysiological modeling: an alternative to finite element methods. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol 10263 LNCS, pp 333–343

  • Mabssout M, Herreros MI (2013) Runge–Kutta vs Taylor-SPH: Two time integration schemes for SPH with application to soil dynamics. Appl Math Model 37(5):3541–3563

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mao W, Caballero A, McKay R, Primiano C, Sun W (2017) Fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of the aortic and mitral valves in a realistic 3D left ventricle model. PLoS ONE 12(9)

  • Mao W, Li K, Sun W (2016) Fluid-structure interaction study of transcatheter aortic valve dynamics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 7(4):374–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesseau S, Sermesant M, Billet F, Delingette H, Ayache N (2015) Personalization of electromechanical models of the cardiac ventricular function by heterogeneous clinical data assimilation. Multi-modality Card Imaging Process Anal

  • Monaghan JJ (2000) SPH without a tensile instability. J Comput Phys 159(2):290–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan JJ (2005) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports. Prog Phys 68(8):1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naceur H, Lin J, Coutellier D, Laksimi A (2015) Efficient smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for the analysis of planar structures undergoing geometric nonlinearities. J Mech Sci Technol 29(5):2147–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden R (2011) Nonlinear mechanics of soft solids including biological tissues. The 5th winter school on Appl. Math. Univ. Hong Kong

  • Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao SP (2004) Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(12–14):1035–1063

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch MK, Karniadakis GE, Humphrey JD (2017) Modeling soft tissue damage and failure using a combined particle/continuum approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(1):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura S, Washio T, Hatano A, Okada J, Watanabe H, Hisada T (2012) Multi-scale simulations of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanics using the University of Tokyo heart simulator. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 110:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swegle JW, Hicks DL, Attaway SW (1995) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis. J Comput Phys 116(1):123–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KC, Wang L, Zhang H, Liu H, Shi P (2010) Meshfree implementation of individualized active cardiac dynamics. Comput Med Imaging Graph 34(1):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LW, Ademiloye AS, Liew KM (2018) Meshfree and Particle Methods in Biomechanics: prospects and challenges. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 642676 (CardioFunXion).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Èric Lluch.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lluch, È., De Craene, M., Bijnens, B. et al. Breaking the state of the heart: meshless model for cardiac mechanics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18, 1549–1561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01175-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01175-9

Keywords

Navigation