Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of the biomechanical behavior of male human urethral tissues validated by histological observations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work aims at observing the mechanical behavior of the membranous and spongy portions of urethrae sampled on male cadavers in compliance with French regulations on postmortem testing, in accordance with the Scientific Council of body donation center of Grenoble. In this perspective, a thermostatic water tank was designed to conduct ex vivo planar tension tests in a physiological environment, i.e., in a saline solution at a temperature of \(37 \pm 1\) \({^{\circ }}\hbox {C}\). In order to observe the anisotropy of the tissues, the samples were tested in two directions. Tests consisting of a series of load–unload cycles of increasing amplitudes were performed to highlight their viscous behavior. The results were then discussed according to the microstructure of tissue, which was investigated using different staining methods and histological analysis. The observed behaviors were then fitted using an anisotropic hyperelastic or a visco-hyperelastic matrix–fiber model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abé H, Hayashi K (1996) In: Sato M (ed) Data book on mechanical properties of living cells, tissues, and organs. Springer, Tokyo

  • Bochereau G, Cathelineau X, Buzelin JM, Bouchot O (1996) Urètre masculin, anatomie chirurgicale, voies d’ abord, instrumentation. Traité Techn Chir Urol 41–305:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Breche Q, Chagnon G, Machado G, Girard E, Nottelet B, Garric X, Favier D (2016) Mechanical behaviours evolution of a PLA-b–PEG-b–PLA triblock copolymer during hydrolytic degradation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 60:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton DJ, Yang J, Teh KK (1994) A review of methods to characterize rubber elastic behavior for use in finite element analysis. Rubber Chem Technol 67:481–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung E, Ranaweera M, Cartmill R (2012) Newer and novel artificial urinary sphincters (AUS): the development of alternatives to the current AUS device. BJU Int 112(4):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dass N, McMurray G, Greenland JE, Brading AF (2001) Morphological aspects of the female pig bladder neck and urethra: quantitative analysis using computer assisted 3-dimensional reconstructions. J Urol 165(4):1294–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JS, Gosling JA (1983) Histology and fine structure of the muscularis mucosae of the human urinary bladder. J Anat 136(2):265

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret AE, Itskov M (2009) Modeling of anisotropic softening phenomena: application to soft biological tissues. Int J Plast 25:901–919

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis H (2005) Anatomy of the urinary bladder, prostate and male urethra. Surgery (Oxford) 23(3):97–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng C, Xu YM, Fu Q, Zhu WD, Cui L, Chen J (2010) Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 94A(1):317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface/R Soc 3(6):15–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Cucchi A, Mearini E, Bini V, Porena M (2003) Pelvic floor muscle behavior during Valsalva leak point pressure measurement in males and females affected by stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 170(2 Pt 1):485–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth DJ, Kitta T, Morelli B, Chew DW, Yoshimura N, de Groat WC, Vorp DA (2011) Strain-dependent urethral response. Neurourol Urodyn 30(8):1652–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA (2000) Biomechanics of soft tissue, the handbook of materials behavior models, vol 3. Academic, Boston, pp 1049–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast Phys Sci Solids 61:1–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Joller D, Mushkolaj S, Ratia-Garcia J, Marti F, Bachmann A, Müller B (2012) Minipig urethra: a suitable animal model in vitro. Technol Health Care 20(4):329–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalla M, Danielsen CC, Austevoll H, Olsen LH, Jørgensen TM (2007) Biomechanical and biochemical assessment of properties of the anterior urethra after hypospadias repair in a rabbit model. J Urol 177(6):2375–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecamwasam HS, Sullivan MP, Yalla SV, Cravalho EG (1999) The flow regimes and the pressure-flow relationship in the canine urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 18(5):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher E, Creane A, Lally C, Kelly DJ (2012) An anisotropic inelastic constitutive model to describe stress softening and permanent deformation in arterial tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 12:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti F, Leippold T, John H, Blunschi N, Müller B (2006) Anisotropic Mullins stress softening of a deformed silicone holey plate. Phys Med Biol 51(5):1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller B, Ratia Garcia J, Marti F, Leippold T (2008) Mechanical properties of urethral tissues. J Biomech 41(July):2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller B, Schulz G, Herzen J, Mushkolaj S, Bormann T, Beckmann F, Püschel K (2010) Morphology of urethral tissues. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 7804, p 78040D

  • Natali AN, Carniel EL, Frigo A, Pavan PG, Todros S, Pachera P, Fontanella CG, Rubini A, Cavicchioli L, Avital Y, De Benedictis GM (2016) Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures. Exp Physiol 101(5):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natali AN, Carniel EL, Fontanella CG, Frigo A, Todros S, Rubini A, De Benedictis GM, Cerruto MA, Artibani W (2017a) Mechanics of the urethral duct: tissue constitutive formulation and structural modeling for the investigation of lumen occlusion. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(02):439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natali AN, Carniel EL, Fontanella CG, Todros S, De Benedictis GM, Cerruto MA, Artibani W (2017b) Urethral lumen occlusion by artificial sphincteric devices: a computational biomechanics approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16(4):1–8

  • Nava A, Mazza E, Kleinermann F, Avis NJ, McClure J, Bajka M (2004) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of human liver and kidney through aspiration experiments. Technol Health Care 12(3):269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña E, Doblare M (2009) An anisotropic pseudo-elastic approach for modelling Mullins effect in fibrous biological materials. Mech Res Commun 36:784–790

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Petiteau JC, Verron E, Othman R, Le Sourne H, Sigrist JF, Barras G (2013) Large strain rate-dependent response of elastomers at different strain rates: convolution integral vs. internal variable formulations. Mech Time Depend Mater 17:349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebouah M, Chagnon G (2014a) Permanent set and stress-softening constitutive equation applied to rubber-like materials and soft tissues. Acta Mech 225:1685–1698

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rebouah M, Chagnon G (2014b) Extension of classical viscoelastic models in large deformation to anisotropy and stress softening. Int J Nonlinear Mech 61:54–64

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rebouah M, Machado G, Chagnon G, Favier D (2013) Anisotropic Mullins stress softening of a deformed silicone holey plate. Mech Res Commun 49:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouiller C (1969) The kidney: morphology, biochemistry, physiology, vol 1. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O (2007) A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response. Med Image Anal 11(4):361–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standring S (ed) (2015) Gray’s anatomy E-book: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences

  • Tonar Z, Zatura F, Grill R (2004) Surface morphology of kidney, ureters and urinary bladder models based on data from the visible human male. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 148(2):249–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toungara M, Chagnon G, Geindreau C (2012) Numerical analysis of the wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of the material model near-incompressibility. J Mech, Med Biol 12(01):1250005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velardo JT (1981) The ureter. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh OH (1993) Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 66(5):754–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Chagnon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masri, C., Chagnon, G., Favier, D. et al. Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of the biomechanical behavior of male human urethral tissues validated by histological observations. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17, 939–950 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1003-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1003-1

Keywords

Navigation