A computational algorithm to simulate disorganization of collagen network in injured articular cartilage
- 96 Downloads
Cartilage defects are a known risk factor for osteoarthritis. Estimation of structural changes in these defects could help us to identify high risk defects and thus to identify patients that are susceptible for the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. Here, we present an algorithm combined with computational modeling to simulate the disorganization of collagen fibril network in injured cartilage. Several potential triggers for collagen disorganization were tested in the algorithm following the assumption that disorganization is dependent on the mechanical stimulus of the tissue. We found that tensile tissue stimulus alone was unable to preserve collagen architecture in intact cartilage as collagen network reoriented throughout the cartilage thickness. However, when collagen reorientation was based on both tensile tissue stimulus and tensile collagen fibril strains or stresses, the collagen network architecture was preserved in intact cartilage. Using the same approach, substantial collagen reorientation was predicted locally near the cartilage defect and particularly at the cartilage–bone interface. The developed algorithm was able to predict similar structural findings reported in the literature that are associated with experimentally observed remodeling in articular cartilage. The proposed algorithm, if further validated, could help to predict structural changes in articular cartilage following post-traumatic injury potentially advancing to impaired cartilage function.
KeywordsArticular cartilage Finite element analysis Collagen Disorganization Injury Cartilage mechanics
CSC—IT Center for Science Ltd., Finland, is acknowledged for providing modeling software and Mikko S. Venäläinen, Ph.D., for technical support.
PT contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and critical revision of the article for intellectual content. PJ took part in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and critical revision of the article for intellectual content. RKK participated in the conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and critical revision of the article for intellectual content.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brand RA (2005) Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes? Iowa Orthop J 25:82–94Google Scholar
- Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ (1998) Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instr Course Lect 47(487–504):9571450Google Scholar
- Ferizi U, Rossi I, Lee Y et al (2016) Diffusion tensor imaging of articular cartilage at 3T correlates with histology and biomechanics in a mechanical injury model. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26336
- Hart DJ, Spector TD, Law M, Doyle DV (1991) The relationship between osteoarthritis (Oa) and osteoporosis in the general population: the chingford study. Rheumatology (United Kingdom) 30:55. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/XXX.suppl_2.52 Google Scholar
- Klodowski A, Mononen ME, Kulmala JP et al (2016) Merge of motion analysis, multibody dynamics and finite element method for the subject-specific analysis of cartilage loading patterns during gait: differences between rotation and moment-driven models of human knee joint. Multibody Syst Dyn 37:271–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-015-9470-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Frank EH, Wang Y et al (2013) Moderate dynamic compression inhibits pro-catabolic response of cartilage to mechanical injury, tumor necrosis factor-\(\alpha \) and interleukin-6, but accentuates degradation above a strain threshold. Osteoarthr Cartil 21:1933–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mow VC, Guo XE (2002) Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4:175–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.110701.120309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Myller KAH, Turunen MJ, Honkanen JTJ et al (2016) In vivo contrast-enhanced cone beam CT provides quantitative information on articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Ann Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1730-3
- Stoop R, van der Kraan PM, Buma P et al (1999) Denaturation of type II collagen in articular cartilage in experimental murine arthritis. Evidence for collagen degradation in both reversible and irreversible cartilage damage. J Pathol 188:329–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199907)188:3%3c329::AID-PATH371%3e3.0.CO;2-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van der Voet A (1997) A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 211:209–11Google Scholar
- Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, van Rietbergen B et al (2005) Erratum to "Stresses in the local collagen network of articular cartilage: a poroviscoelastic fibril-reinforced finite element study" [Journal of Biomechanics 37 (2004) 357–366] and “A fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling model for articular cartil. J Biomech 38:2138–2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.024